White House Threatens Limbaugh Over Obama Criticism , page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 42 times


reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 07:39 PM by Rams59lb
reply to post by Doctor G



OMG, LMAO... That is cute, very cute. I have a hard enough time writing emails to our officials here in Nevada just to keep us from losing our freedoms which by the way have been surely gone before this guy came along.

Thanks for the vote of confidence and know that my entire work staff are simply laughing so hard at work now after reading that as they always nominate me for anything that has to be debated lol.


reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 07:52 PM by Rams59lb
reply to post by semperfortis



I too served our country for over 12 yrs, the more this Admin shows that they are thin skinned, then the more will be said about them in a negitive way! That is simply the way people are! It is going to get ugly


reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 08:05 PM by jd140
reply to post by lee anoma



Okay the White House says that Rush is on thin ice.

If you don't see that as a threat then what do you think Gibbs meant by it? Please enlighten us as to what he could have possibly meant.


reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 08:15 PM by Avenginggecko
Disclaimer: I don't believe the Democrats or the Republicans have handled the situation well. Both sides are throwing around a lot of WW2 rhetoric that's just stupid. I don't know if anyone's read up on WW2 and what Europe was like before the war broke out, but it was nothing like this. If raucous town hall meetings turn into bloody riots, people start getting killed, the government actually takes real steps to silence media outlets, and roving gangs of Democrats/Republicans start jumping their opposites, then we'll have something like WW2.

Us Americans have quite the flare for drama.

So far all that's happening is two diametrically opposed sides getting extremely emotional over a huge piece of legislation, which is understandable because what's going to go through won't be exactly what either side wants, and since neither side's fundamentalists are willing to budge on the issue, the war of words starts heating up.

As another poster brought up, this same stuff happened for years after Bush began the Iraq war. Burning effigies, burning flags, nazi symbolism, etc. I don't see this as any different basically, it's just getting supported by the other side now.


That being said, I watched the video and from the context of the conversation I didn't see Gibbs making a threat. It seemed like he was referring to thin ice rhetorically, as in anyone who uses nazi symbolism and references is on thin ice because once you pull the swastika card many outside observers won't take you as seriously because we all know (or should) that the situation then was catastrophically worse than now.

Honest question to those who feel hurt/disenfranchised/afraid due to this: When you saw protesters marking Bush's picture up with swastikas and marching angrily in our major cities, did you really take them very seriously? Did you think, "There might be civil war for this" or, "I completely agree with them, we need to pull out immediately!"

Or did you think, "Those Liberals are freaking ridiculous. Wasting their time with those stupid posters marching up and down the street like they make a difference. They're a laughing stock." Something along those lines, anyway. I live in Texas so I can speak from experience that quite a few of us here thought along those lines.

Regardless, I seriously doubt the White House meant this in any way to be a threat against Rush Limbaugh...Like they would actually threaten and remove the Republican poster boy when his base is riled up at its greatest.


reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 08:24 PM by jd140
reply to post by Avenginggecko



If you don't see what Gibbs said as a threat then I refer you to my question in the post above yours.


reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 08:38 PM by Avenginggecko
reply to post by jd140



I already answered your question in my post. I'll quote it and emphasize it below.

That being said, I watched the video and from the context of the conversation I didn't see Gibbs making a threat. It seemed like he was referring to thin ice rhetorically, as in anyone who uses nazi symbolism and references is on thin ice because once you pull the swastika card many outside observers won't take you as seriously because we all know (or should) that the situation then was catastrophically worse than now.


Care to address anything in my post? Like I said, I'm not assigning blame or credibility to either side. Just hoping we all remember that these same situations happened to Liberals/Democrats during the peak of the Bush Administration in nearly the exact form and fashion it's happening to Conservatives/Republicans now.

Sometimes I feel like we're all on two sides of a coin constantly being flipped in the air. Just wish sometimes we'd stop the us vs. them mentality and realize we need to be concentrating on who's doing the flipping.

Thanks!


reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 08:42 PM by jd140
reply to post by Avenginggecko



Yea I will address your post.

Its making excuses for the White House.


I find it very difficult to believe Gibbs said what he did out of concern that people won't take Rush seriously. Gibbs and the rest of the White House don't want people to take Rush seriously, that is why they poke fun at him and discredit him any chance they get.



reply posted on 7-8-2009 @ 08:42 PM by HimWhoHathAnEar
reply to post by Avenginggecko



I would say that our mistake would have been not taking people seriously enough when they questioned the (still ongoing) War against no one in Particular. Maybe if we had, We the People could have found some common ground. As it is, the people who really run the show (rothschilds, et al) are laughing their arses off, seeing how easily fooled we are. After all, it only took TWO choices to confuse us while they looted the place and are heading for the door.

We're going to deserve whatever we get. The price for Freedom was Eternal Vigilance. I always thought it odd that people said not to bring up religion or politics in conversation. I guess the things that really matter aren't to be discussed in a politically correct, uh, I mean 'civilized' discussion.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Senator Paul is being detained at the Nashville Airport by the TSA
  Posted 18 days ago with 89 member flags
Bruins goalie Tim Thomas takes stand against U.S Government
  Posted 18 days ago with 88 member flags
This is what happens when Ford announces they are hiring
  Posted 19 days ago with 77 member flags
Romney: "I\'m Not Concerned About the Very Poor"
  Posted 9 days ago with 73 member flags
The Girl Killed by Obama: She "never saw it coming"
  Posted 3 days ago with 62 member flags
Ron Paul In Nevada - The Caucus Is Rigged!! - w/VIDEO
  Posted 5 days ago with 60 member flags