It has become abundantly clear to me that this is no longer our form of government which we have in the States.
The fact that we have allowed these things called 'Presidential Directives' to exist is almost proof enough; but then take into account that one of
the more recent ones (PDD 51) allows the POTUS to "suspend the constitution" for a number of different vague reasons, and this would be
"legal".
We now have a new puppet president who I'm sure sees no problem with this, and wouldn't even think of getting rid of said PDD. In more likelihood
he will probably use this same PDD as his basis of legality, should he ever choose to "suspend the constitution".
Maybe we should inform wikipedia of this:
en.wikipedia.org...
Nevermind, looks like they already know:
en.wikipedia.org...
Presidential directives are a form of executive order issued by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the National
Security Council. As a form of executive order, a presidential directive has the "full force and effect of law."
If you go to wiki via that link, and look on the right hand side of the page you will see listings for the different 'Forms of Government'.
I've read through most or all of them and IMO our current form of government shows the most resemblance to an
unspoken/unwritten
'Corporatocracy':
en.wikipedia.org...
Which do you all think best describes the 'Form of Government' we have these days, over here in the USA?
[edit on 7-8-2009 by Paroxysm]