It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Project Camelot Interview Dr Steven Greer

page: 12
34
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 17 2009 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Watched every single one of their interviews --minus this one.

Both sides are working to push their information.

None, or rather very little of either side is verifiable.

I can watch Jerry Springer for the same chemical response.

Hard issue - yes. Much interesting information - yes.

Ego necessary? Mmmm no.

Ego present? - yes.

My two cents after reading the gist of the reaction to this video. [Not to mention, you take one look at the screen capture of the video and can tell both parties are extremely upset.]

No thanks. I'll continue watching any video where the parties involved are in control of themselves. Otherwise, I might as well turn Springer on and start listening to 'mah stories.




posted on Aug, 19 2009 @ 10:49 AM
link   
Seems to me, it was a shred interview and I believe Kerry was on the mark and Greer off the page, especially his final remarks at the end.

The two bodies Greer and Prg Cam had some differences which were touched on after greer came out of hiding and sat down w/them.

It's my opinion Greer was the wrong person to lead any disclosure effort of the UFO problem. He continually trips on his own arrogance and know-it-all to conclusion, attitude. He frequently mentions his big meetings with the elite in the gov (US) who know as if he's privy to things no-one else is.

He should have stayed with his medical profession, and left the UFO problem to the many who have spent so much time and effort in trying to find the truth, eg Late Dr McDonald. Raymond Fowler, Late Dr John Mack.
Timothy Good, Keyhoe and the many others

Decoy



posted on Aug, 20 2009 @ 08:23 AM
link   
reply to post by davidifty
 


She's quite a mouth piece huh?

I like the Camelot project but in comparison to a professional, her 'secret witness' and what she has dug up is rather insignificant.

It seems very disrespectful of her to question his research and professional opinion with a less then professional opinion herself.

Did they invite him for an interview or an interrogation?? I don't agree with tag-teaming anyone.

[edit on 20-8-2009 by Jessicaviv] spelling errors

[edit on 20-8-2009 by Jessicaviv]



posted on Aug, 20 2009 @ 09:05 AM
link   
reply to post by davidifty
 


You know what I love, when people speak English..you know 'dumb it down"..

I would have gotten a whole lot more out of that conversation if they would stop their upstaging word play and just spit it out already..

Simplistic
microcosm
extrapolate

I had to write this crap down as I listened so I could look it up and understand what they were talking about.



posted on Aug, 20 2009 @ 09:33 AM
link   
I noticed how Dr. Greer changed his interest after a friend of mine handed him a video. Its my personal belief the reason for his new focus is based upon the energy that power's those flying saucers and why the government has kept it top secret. Free energy would change the way business is conducted globally.



posted on Aug, 20 2009 @ 01:05 PM
link   
Haven't watched anything Greer related for a long time but I see he's still up to his usual "we have proof of this right now" type claims.... you have people who can explain how UFOs are travelling across vast distances right now in great detail? You've seen zero point energy machines? Great, whack it up on your website Steve and lets all take a look.

No? I'll check back in five years then.


[edit on 20-8-2009 by Nova]



posted on Aug, 23 2009 @ 06:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Tamale_214
 


Tamale_214, congratulations on an excellent piece of writing. Your open letter addressed the exact concerns that I, myself, have had for quite a while with the interview style of 'Project Camelot'. You have offered an extremely well thought out reply to their travesty of an (I hesitate to use this term, because of the shoddy use of the technique by the so-called 'interviewers') interview. I have been away from the interwebs for a while due to a computer issue, and upon my return found this 'interview' and sought to make a thread of my own out of it. Finding that I had missed my opportunity (with use of the ATS search function, something that ALL users of ATS might benefit from), your post, Tamale_214, perfectly illustrates my exact feelings regarding this complete and utter travesty (I know I've used the word previously in my post, but cannot find a synonym more suitable) of an interview. Well done, sir or madam, and may your words be taken to heart by the Project Camelot team. I first came upon them while researching the erstwhile John Lear, whose views, whilst I haven't reached absolute conclusions about, should have been heard without the ceaseless and, quite frankly, interminable interruptions of Kerry Cassidy. The look upon Mr Lear's face when he was constantly interrupted by Ms Kassidy's irrelevant and uniformed opinions were very, very telling. Let's hope that Project Camelot, who, it must be said, provide a decent forum for those who may not find an outlet for the particular information that those whistleblowers who may not have such an outlet have to offer, take from this criticism what they will, and, hopefully, improve the unfettered testimony they recieve from the whistleblowers they encounter, those testimonies untainted by the interviewer's own opinions and prejudices.



posted on Aug, 25 2009 @ 11:38 PM
link   
reply to post by mellisamouse
 


---

I disagree with you. Greer was himself, arrogant. Stevens' last spiel during the JOINT interview was a total laugh. I wish him well in his future endeavors, just don't think well wishes will help him in his quest to know it all. Good luck egotistical non-practising Dr Greer.

Decoy

edit: remove "former", add "non-practising"

[edit on 25-8-2009 by Decoy]



posted on Aug, 29 2009 @ 01:44 PM
link   
Ya know, after watching project disclosure and then learning more about WW2, the germans, the nazi's, American / Nazi Euguenics... I had a hard time swallowing that there wasn't more to UFO's than just little gray beings from outerspace..... and this is from someone who has been into UFO's since she was about 10. I was so extremely please to hear him mention the word Nazi's and subject, I like alot of others am not debating on other life visiting this earth but... well anyways I thought it was a decent interview, bit too much bickering.. it seemed to me I got both of their points very early on.



posted on Aug, 29 2009 @ 06:57 PM
link   
What an annoying woman, damn...

She does not let him finish one word, she yells, she thinks her theories are truth..

This is not the first time i let PC go, and i will do it again. Damn what a moron

[edit on 29/8/09 by TheNetherlands]



posted on Aug, 29 2009 @ 08:28 PM
link   
I watched this video and though it was hard to get through just out of boredom really on everything being said I would just like to say that regardless of what anyone else is doing out there that you don't like or agree with regardless of how they handle themselves people should start taking a good look at themselves first.

It seems to runs in the blood on earth like an illness, people love looking at other people pointing the finger and finding error/mistakes in them, now I won't judge everyone either myself in saying this but will say that it's clear that a large number of people out there do this from what we see. I understand that if it was our job to judge people on a professional level then perhaps these people were off but so what it's the very attitude of pointing fingers at others and name calling that gets ourselves peronally in trouble.

It affects your character/soul and much more on many levels when you hold to such an attitude. People in my opinion should focus on themselves and stay away from pointing fingers, thinking negative things of others and even blaming others or the world for their problems/situation.

Take a good look in the mirror, your not perfect!







[edit on 29-8-2009 by ET_MAN]



posted on Sep, 3 2009 @ 03:47 AM
link   
A great chance of a fantastic interview ruined with bickering and interuptions.

They had a great chance to ask some very interesting questions, but in the end they argued about 1 or 2 points for over an hour.

To be honest I came away from this with much more respect for Greer and much less for Camelot.

He seems very sincere in what he knows and he has right approach in my opinion in not expecting Et to be hostile.

I think he is right. The governments want us to think they could be hostile because that gives them the REASON to not disclose all.




posted on Sep, 4 2009 @ 11:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Tamale_214
 


Exactly. I agree 100%. I've seen all of the PC video interviews and not one of them show Kerry or Bill in a offensive attacking posture as they had with Dr. Greer. Kerry has continuously stated that she likes to ask the hard questions and to get people out of their element. This is evident in all the video's and they do do that but this video was pure ego driven as you stated. From the very beginning of the video Kerry has a a very stern and irritated look on her face, almost a angry look about her.

I completely understood were Dr. Greer was coming from. And like u said Greer was the only one who was making any sense. This was Bill and Kerry at their worst. If I was a newcomer to PC and saw this video first, it would probably turn me off from them. Its amazing that I have never seen this "interviewing style" as Kerry claims is her norm, done with anybody else they have interviewed. However I was very impressed at how Dr. Greer handled the whole thing. Very cool, and with a leveled head. Never once demeaning or belittling Kerry or Bills arguments.

All Dr. Greer was saying was that ETE are not evil by design. As is the same with humans. Nobody come out of the freakn womb ready to start killing people. No, evil or devious deeds are a habitual learned experience is what he was trying to say. And to assume automatically that there are bad and good ETE is placing us right in the same situation of racism and hate we have on the planet right now. So what Dr. Greer is using is the law of Attraction. If you think there are bad ETE's and you continue to focus on that then you will eventually have that experience. And I believe as that Kerry and Bill were being targeted with these negative energies patterns that they always talk about on the radio shows and even mentioned negative attacks at the Barcelona Summit. So exactly, Kerry and Bills promotion of discernment in the growth process was severely lacking in this video.

Nice Post Tamale



posted on Sep, 4 2009 @ 01:07 PM
link   
reply to post by ROBO6
 


Well,

thanks to all for kind words regarding my open letter. I haven't been to this thread since my original posts because, well because I've already said my piece.

It is always encouraging to know that I'm not completely out in left field and that what I have to say is echoed by others, that what I have to offer may readily accepted.

I'm humbled.



posted on Sep, 8 2009 @ 02:02 PM
link   
The crux of the matter is revealed thus, at 0:44:32, with the following exchange:

PC: ''we don't know, but neither do you, and you shouldn't say that you know when you don't...''

SG: ''Well, actually...''

PC: ''He doesn't know...he's PRESUMING to know...''

There you have it. PC are miffed that SG is a know-it-all. He knows things that they don't, or says/implies he does, in his most authoritative manner, and it hurts their egos. Maybe it's all BS, on both sides, but it seems to me that this is the source of the 'disagreement'.



posted on Oct, 4 2009 @ 03:07 PM
link   
This interview is terrible! I think Dr.Greer was great and I applaud him for keeping his cool in such a hostile interview. It was like Kerry wanted to discredit Dr.Greer.
She should go.

I found myself getting angry at her approach to Dr.Greer That was not a "DEBATE" but more like, we are going to impose our views on you and make you look stupid.

Kerry....please do not do that again!

[edit on 4-10-2009 by metalvenom]



posted on Oct, 4 2009 @ 03:43 PM
link   
God...that lady needs to STFU and stop interrupting....that is SO annoying
... LEARN TO LISTEN BEFORE SPEAKING. Ok, you disagree with the guy, but at least wait until hes done with his answer.

[edit on 4-10-2009 by Unplugged]



posted on Oct, 5 2009 @ 10:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by davidifty(edit -It should have been a good interview but unfortunately Kerry's ego from PC seemed to try and take over)

totally. this woman is painful to say the least. she just dribbles unnecessary waffle, constantly, to the point where she is condescending and not enjoyable to watch.

i have felt this for a while and was not going to say anything because i didnt want to sound negative. but when i saw others voicing their feelings, i had to put forward my agreement.



posted on Oct, 25 2009 @ 09:30 PM
link   
...the same for me. I don't post much, but i had to log in and comment on Kerry.

I have been a fan of PC for a while, but I think that they (Kerry) are beginning to think that they are important in the whole ufo, disclosure etc thing. There not.

Kerry is trying to steal the limelight fuelled with jealously because PC isn't great. A lot of the poeple they interview or would like to interview are pretty big and well known in the field - where as she is an idiot with a camera. She in a no one pretending to be important.. Greer should of laughed in her face and walked off, but kudos to you Greer for keeping you cool with these idiots..

Hate PC now. She has ruined it for me,



posted on Feb, 26 2010 @ 12:08 AM
link   
Watched this video and was completely fascinated by it, and the many different responses here. To begin Kerry did an ok job, the guys here can complain all they want bout her, obviously expecting some demure yes girl, nope! She's terrific and I wish all the other reporters could do this as well. Furthermore, up until that interview I was of half a mind thinking they were a part of majestics plan, disinfo, now I think that only some of their interviewees are. She was authentic.

That being said, I agreed with Steven Greer for the most part on what he had said. And suspect that this debate was arranged after he brought up her blog and so they seemed to go into this with a decided intention to get this difference out in the open. It was really interesting, far more so than the average interview.




[edit on 26-2-2010 by Unity_99]




top topics



 
34
<< 9  10  11    13 >>

log in

join