I doubt that the genocide continues, though it certainly did exist. Among other things, the US army gave smallpox-infected blankets to many Indians,
who had no natural immunity to that disease. Smallpox wiped out entire villages. That's in addition to the usual shooting and murdering, and
putting these people in desert reservations which had no arable land or hunting grounds. No question about the genocide happening.
The comment about hantavirus is incorrect. While it *may* exist "downwind" from US Army sites, it also exists elsewhere. Pretty much it shows up
where there are rodents. That would include Asia, Europe, South America, and North America. I don't see anything about Africa, Australia, or
Antarctica. But hantavirus is neither rare nor limited to any special locations.
One of the hot spots for
hantavirus in the US is the Four Corners Indian reservation. There's no
military base nearby. It's just where some rodents exist, and leave the virus.
The virus is spread through rodent feces and urine (
CDC). If someone
disturbs these locations, dust can be raised that carries the virus. If inhaled, it can cause illness, which can be fatal. In the desert, these
locations are going to be dry, meaning it is easy to stir up dust if you disturb the ground.
There is nothing to show that any genocide continues. The US has already eliminated the Indians as any sort of threat. There is no need to kill
them, especially when there are far more troublesome groups around that would make more plausible targets.
As for the scrapie issue - we have a *veterinarian* alerting US authorities about the possibility of scrapie-infected sheep entering the food chain.
But I have a couple of observations about that.
First, scrapie is an ancient disease that has affected sheep for hundreds of years. It is common in Scotland, where it gets its name. It isn't
known to infect humans.
Granted, "not known to infect humans" isn't the same as saying "it is known to be safe for humans". I wouldn't eat lamb if I knew it came from
an animal that had scrapie. However, it makes no sense to try to commit genocide with an agent that is not known to affect humans. Seems to me
you'd want something a bit deadlier than that.
Finally, I'm not at all certain that the US government has jurisdiction on the Navajo reservation. The Navajo Nation may not welcome
biligaana interference with their
affairs. Let's face it - the US government doesn't exactly have a sterling reputation among Indians. I know, hard to believe, but it's true.
Oh, yes, about the radiation thing. During the filming of the movie "The Conqueror" (John Wayne playing Ghengis Khan of all people), the site was
downwind from a nuclear test site. The actors and crew were exposed to radioactive fallout. Over 40% of these people came down with cancer. I doubt
the US was trying to commit genocide on John Wayne. The truth is, back then the dangers of exposure to nonlethal amounts of radiation weren't
recognized.
So to summarize: The US has no reason to commit genocide against the Indians. If they're trying to do it, they've chosen some ridiculous ways to do
it - a disease that has not been shown to infect humans, and low-level radiation that takes decades to kill someone, often well past their
childbearing age. Sure, maybe you'd get a mutation or two, but likely you'd get nothing except some older folks dying before their time. This is
not the stuff of genocide.
[edit on 8/6/2009 by chiron613]