It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dizziedame
Please, I Really am turned off when I see commercials with my food talking to me.
Could we be getting the message that it's a OK to eat living things with personalities much like humans?
Originally posted by allsop
Mc Donalds is still food, where I am in new zealand they actually produce the food from real meat and vegetables.
The food tastes good, you can't deny that just because you think that the illuminati runs the business :|
Originally posted by mpriebe81
reply to post by Floating thru Reality
As far as the "reptilian" on the bag.....couldn't it also be perceived
as a swamp monster? Swamp monsters seem like a much more
plausible living being than outerspace reptilians to me.
In these two pictures, we establish that McDonald's is indeed pushing an alien agenda. The next promotion involves Legos, not aliens, so why the blatant alien agenda on the front and back of the bag?
Originally posted by dalan.
If you look at it from the mind of a child who is already used to seeing pictures of human children of different races holding hands, then maybe you could understand. To the mind of a child they would associate the picture on the McDonalds bag as meaning "Aliens are friends..."
Its that simple, but the question is why?
We are over-saturated with images of extra-terrestrials constantly, but it is different when those images are used in a manner that the child can relate with. It may not be a bad thing to have children believing that aliens are friends, but why would you want to? What else would there be to gain besides a marketing ploy? In all honesty McDonalds doesnt really need the marketing ploy at all.
Originally posted by Watcher-In-The-Shadows
reply to post by dalan.
And if it were a child swamp monster it should have some sort of algae hanging off it as swamp monsters tend to.
Do you realize the weakness of this argument???