It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dragonridr
And they have the right to arrest you Has nothing to do with this county so stop trying to say border agents are different here then anywhere else there not.
In a program unique to the Yuma Sector, Border Patrol agents were given the authority to write citations in low-quantity marijuana cases as though they were deputies working for the Yuma County Sheriff's Office.
Few would argue that big dope smugglers or those carrying an arsenal of hard drugs shouldn't feel the pinch of the law. If it weren't for the trained dogs, smugglers could run thousands of pounds of drugs through the Yuma Sector checkpoints.
But the vast majority of people getting busted at checkpoints in Arizona near Yuma aren't smugglers or illegal immigrants. They aren't even big-shot partiers like Lil Wayne. They're just average people who happen to be carrying a smidgen of marijuana in their vehicles.
omg who really cares what he had in his car anyways?
Originally posted by ReelView
Drugs, like illegal aliens are just a ruse for the feds to systematically condition people to feeling dependent on the fed and think of themselves as helpless and subvervient. While at the same time, of course, the fed runs the drug war and the drug peddling industry and the importation of illegals.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Literally hundreds of thousands of illegals use that corridor to enter california.
In the Yuma Sector, low-level busts of people with marijuana are staving off boredom for Border Patrol agents.
Spokesman Schappell talks almost wistfully of the days when the sector was hopping with illegal immigrants. Now, agents don't spend much time chasing down border crossers and hauling in big loads of drugs, he admits.
On a sunny February day, Schappell cruises a sandy road on the northern side of the imposing security fence that runs from San Luis to just past the distant Tinajas Altas Mountains on the horizon. Not a footprint can be seen for miles in the soft earth.
"Anybody who says a fence doesn't work, I say, 'Come to Yuma,'" Schappell says.
What the HELL are you talking about?? Hundreds of thousands of illegals use and EASTBOUND interstate to enter California (which is WEST by the way) from Arizona??? I guess that's why you were busted twice, lol.
Hundreds of thousands of illegals, yeah, right...
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by Annee
See what I mean about dimentia, Annee?
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by Annee
Okay Annee, you've already said that like 10 times on this thread.
Originally posted by Annee
Let me know when that changes.
Originally posted by harvib
reply to post by Annee
Understanding there importance and value you must then be in support of these measure being used in increasing numbers and for various other crime prevention purposes. I believe random house checks may also be effective. Why not support measures such as those?
[edit on 8-8-2009 by harvib]
Originally posted by Moshpet
Originally posted by harvib
reply to post by Annee
Understanding there importance and value you must then be in support of these measure being used in increasing numbers and for various other crime prevention purposes. I believe random house checks may also be effective. Why not support measures such as those?
[edit on 8-8-2009 by harvib]
I think the problem with establishing 'random checks' as a method crime prevention, in general , largely stems from the point in which the government cannot absolutely ensure they are truly random.
I believe that the Border Patrol, in that they check every vehicle or some set ratio 1:3, 2:5 1:7 etc, does so in a manner that is fair and impartial; and importantly can be demonstrated as fair and impartial in a court of law.
Random checks on the other hand, could be challenged as unfair, that they are not impartial and or biased under a multitude points. The challenges largely stemming from, race, economics, age, political party support (bumper stickers), political activism (again bumper stickers or political rallys), neighborhood, and so on.
Originally posted by Annee
By the way. I have been driving AZ to San Diego for 15 years. The checks have been in existence for 20.
There is not supposed to be illegal search and seizure, but they retain the right of probable cause. Literally hundreds of thousands of illegals use that corridor to enter california. You would be hard pressed to argue that they don't have probable cause at that point.