It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by juan_galto
Then why would they need to deputize the BP agents in order to detain U.S. citizens?
I choose my Right to a safe environment.
What exactly would you have American citizens do? Wear an armband?
. . . . stay tuned to our broadcast as we circle back to the illegal use of dogs smelling drugs in your car. Oh - wait - the dogs are legal - the drugs are not.
If they start coming after me on my property and in my own home - - that will not be OK.
Originally posted by mrroqout
Arizona is Draconian State just like the original law, get out while you can.
Originally posted by 27jd
That question, Annee, was meant for a poster who stated the Border Patrol has always had the authority to detain and arrest U.S. citizens, but if that were the case, they wouldn't need to be deputized to do so. And the man in the youtube video who refused to answer any of their questions, and instead grilled them would NOT have driven away.
Originally posted by mrroqout
I see alot of talk about "Drugs" there were no "drugs" only DRIED FLOWERS.
Originally posted by harvib
reply to post by mysticalzoe
Amen to that, He broke the law, deal with it. I don't think Border Control is that tough actually since more and more illegal immigrants are still getting into our country. You got off easy with the border control, the Mexican border control is worse with Americans. I've been to mexico 4 times, each time our car was always searched, for drugs, illegal immigrants, and stolen children. Did he whine about it, and cry, no, he took it like a man, and said thank god they are doing their job!!
The guy wasn't at the border. He was never in Mexico. He is an American Citizen that was detained without cause or warrant. This should not be acceptable to any American. However it seems most spew the same rhetoric, in some cases word for word. Which would lead one to believe that the source of this rhetoric is not from ones own mind but from a common source.
"Next time THINK!!"
Originally posted by Moshpet
Clearly this is nothing more than an effort to demonize the Boarder Patrol Agency. Wrongly demonize it.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by Moshpet
Clearly this is nothing more than an effort to demonize the Boarder Patrol Agency. Wrongly demonize it.
That's completely untrue, i've stated a few times the BP agents were polite and did their job professionally. They're not the ones who have allowed this checkpoint, that is no longer in an area with high volumes of illegals, to shift it's focus on citizens, using powers that the regular police force does not have in order to generate revenue, not keep americans safe. Nothing more.
He was detained with cause, he was transporting drugs.
The Boarder Patrol, of has been pointed out a few times now, has an operational theater (region) that extents -way- past the thin confines of the physical border of the USA. This operational jurisdiction has been established under the laws of the country, and upheld by the High Courts, which are tasked with defining the laws of this country and how they interact with the Constitution.
The arguments that have been eschewed by proponents of the OP, are erroneous, misguided; and largely are only fomented to garner distrust of government agency that is tasked with the safety of this country.
Is the county in which the BP station taking advantage of the flow of drugs coming through the check point intentionally? No, but considering that the shear volume of drugs that are being caught at that check point, the entire process has become streamlined out of sheer Necessity!
No, the High Courts, whose job it is to interpret the law say they are not.