It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by nixie_nox
ONCE AGAIN...I was NOWHERE near the US/Mexican border. I never left the country, at all. Jesus, please read before posting...
Originally posted by drock905
IMO they had every right to search your car after the dog hit on it. How do they know what you could have? Maybe you had pounds in your car, they had reasonable cause and are doing their jobs.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by dragonridr
Dude, YOU'RE not getting it. We're NOT talking about Al Capone, and the prohibition. Which failed if you don't remember, the same as this BS prohibition will. What part of they are targeting small time users aren't you understanding? This is new, this never happened here before, and it's a violation of our rights under the constitution. Here since you won't read the article, THIS is the issue I have with this...
Using drug-sniffing dogs at checkpoints to catch small-time marijuana users probably seems like a smart idea to Americans who view drug use as morally unacceptable.
However, keeping in mind the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, judges have traditionally taken a dim view of such "suspicion-less" stops and searches of vehicles.
After first taking office in 1993, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, a former DEA agent, proposed staking out main roads in and out of Maricopa County with checkpoints. Then-County Attorney Rick Romley put the kibosh on Arpaio's idea, saying it was unconstitutional.
www.phoenixnewtimes.com...
This IS unconstitutional, REGARDLESS how you feel about the issue of prohibition.
[edit on 5-8-2009 by 27jd]
Originally posted by 27jd
To the last few posters, I personally believe most of you to be complete hypocrites, as two of the posters who have judged me the most personally, just had a little side discussion about their tobacco habits. I guess as long as their corporate masters approve of thier far more dangerous, and disgusting habits, it's cool. I actually hope cancer eats away at both of your hypocritical bodies, and teaches you what happens when you blindly follow evil, greedy masters while judging everybody else. After all, you've all wished some pretty harsh things on me. Karma's a bitch.
Also, I am NOT at all interested in ANY of your selective judgement or sympathy. That was NOT the purpose of this thread, it was to point out a violation of our constitution, in which it says NOTHING about the BP being able to ignore.
YOU ALL are the ones who have made the discussion about drugs. I have NO need for sympathy, i'm in no real trouble, i just have to pay a small fine.
I'm very glad though that i started this thread, it has made it very clear to me that we are NOT a country united.
Going forward though, i would support an assault weapon and ammo ban, for the SOLE purpose of getting the satisfaction of watching you rednecks be forced to hand over that which you feel you should have the right to possess as adults, or be criminals yourselves, then maybe this 4th amendment violation will hit a little closer to home. I know that is counter-productive to the cause of fighting an oppressive government, but it's become clear that you rednecks are ALL TALK. You wouldn't raise a weapon to your beloved government, ever. They wouldn't need to pry ANYTHING from your cold, dead hands. The moment it becomes illegal you will all scramble to turn them in, because you hate criminals so much, you would NEVER want to become one i'm sure. It's only a matter of time.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by thegreatone
Right, I know. It's physically impossible for some people not to relentlessly judge others who have done NOTHING to harm anybody. It's something that has been handed down from your redneck parents, that was handed down from theirs. I hope somehow though, that your backwards breed becomes extinct. I really do. Anyway, once again, we cannot discuss drugs here, or I would happily. This is about the government now being able to search EVERY car on the interstate, without the driver breaking any rules to warrant a dog being run around the car. It is a subject that i have personal experience with, but it's NOT about me, at all. You either agree with this violation of rights, or you don't. Doesn't change anything. When they do ban guns, the constitution won't matter then either, it will still be illegal and anybody who doesn't turn them in will be a lowlife criminal, just like me.
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
How mature are you wishing that people get cancer that eats their bodies? Smoke from illegal substances is just as dangerous as tobacco smoke.
Speaking of judgemental, who are you to tell people they must agree with you.
I'm very glad though that i started this thread, it has made it very clear to me that we are NOT a country united.
You got that right buster. Some of us are anti-drug illegal drugs. As far as I am concerned, you don't have any rights to complain, being an admitted user. As far as I am concerned, a fine was not enough for you. I think your but should be in a tent city for a few days.
Once again, what a childish thing to say, and it has NOTHING to do with your thread, or your mistake of driving around with drugs. Get over it already!
Originally posted by thegreatone
Third, where does it say they can search EVERY car on the interstate? They cant, without cause, and a drug dog behaving suspiciously IS CAUSE.
Lastly i dont agree this is a violation of rights at all.
Good luck with your court case and move to cali
Originally posted by 27jd
You have NO clue by which means i choose to relax, you're probably so incredibly ignorant you think smoking is the only way. Yes, smoke is a carcinogen, i'm WELL aware if it. And yes, I do wish that, I am not above hating my enemies, which is what you people who support the erosion of our human rights are.
I never said people must agree with me. Show me where I posted that, i'm just sick of all the false do-gooders trying to lecture me like i'm their child.
My thread is about the searching of every vehicle traveling the interstate, and how i feel that is against the constitution. That's it, i posted my personal story as an opening for a discussion about THAT, not my personal choices.
Nothing has or will change about my personal life, so you're all wasting your time. Of course my vehicle will be clean from now on, my false idea that we live in a somewhat free country where the authorities can't just rifle through your things is far gone.
So, for that I am greatful to the BP, for teaching me that for a small fee. Also, i must say in fairness to the BP agents themselves, they were cool to me on a human level. I just disagree with searching every car on the interstate, if you can't see that past your deep personal concern regarding my choice as an adult to relax how i see fit, then we have nothing more to discuss.
K, another person who feels that once you break a law, you no longer have rights. Thanks for sharing.
Whatever, I admit it will be personally satisfying to see you judgemental rednecks get a taste of your own medicine. I can't wait for that day.
Originally posted by Blanca Rose
Ha, you said it without saying it by wishing people who don't agree with you to die of cancer that eats their bodies! If you don't want to be treated like a child, then don't make childish comments.
Uh huh! Yeah, if you were so concerned about it why didn't you make a thread BEFORE you got caught driving around with illegal drugs in your car? Funny how you decided to care once it affected you!
They don't search every car on the interstate. Just the ones going through the check point. Over exaggeration has not helped your cause.
I don't own a gun, and am from the north Chicago suburbs. See, how we might not be the only judgemental people in your thread?
It was approved by the United States Supreme Court it is constitutional Harvib. I believe that's their job...making sure laws are within limits...
(c) Under the circumstances of these checkpoint stops, which do not involve searches, the Government or public interest in making such stops outweighs the constitutionally protected interest of the private citizen. Pp. 428 U. S. 560-562.
Originally posted by dragonridr
Originally posted by and14263
I will never blindly obide by a law which is in my view ethically wrong, just because i happen to have had no choice where I was born.
What happened to you was bad.
I am not shocked in the slightest people on here are making sweeping neanderthal judgements about what makes a man. Wow.
This thread has shown me quite a lot about controlling the underlings. No wonder the so called NWO can get away with anything it wants.
Guess what dont like the laws here move there is countries where its legal your an adult move! If you like it here to much then work to get the law changed if your not willing to do either of these two things than stop complaining.Oh wait you want someone else to do the work for you so you can just sit there doing nothing right! You always have choices no matter where you are born.