reply to post by Question
I do want to point something out though, and see what your response to this is. In the whole scheme of things, taking it to the very very basic level.
Do you really think that the elite CAN take over the land and resources.
They definitely have plans to take over the land. George Hunt
reported on the
Fourth World Wilderness Congress where the international bankers discussed plans to grab US land. One look at the
Project” they tried to sneak through
the US Congress tells us the threat is real especially now that the “chief Science Advisor” is
about saving our “wild lands” The “Wildlands
” was first conceived by Dave Foreman and H.R.
980 was first introduced in 1993 by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)
On the international scene bankers have indicated they want control of as much land (and the natural resources under it) as they can get their hands
on. The World Bank/IMF structural adjustment programs
was forced on third world countries
with debt problems and used to grab up valuable third world farmland.
is just know finding out how their government screwed them
using a privatized banking/monetary system and thereby leaving them prey for the IMF. Then there is the World Conservation Bank and the “land for
In 1933, Congressman McFadden introduced House Resolution No. 158, Articles of Impeachment for the Secretary of the Treasury, two assistant
Secretaries of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the officers and directors of its twelve regional banks. Subsequently
he was shot at twice, poisoned and had his stomach pumped, and poison a second time so he reportedly “died of the stomach flue” on Oct. 3, 1936.
Here is part of McFadden's speech
“The Fed Note is essentially unsound. It is the worst currency and the most dangerous that this Country has ever known... They should not have made
the Government [liable on the private] debts of individuals and corporations, and, least of all, on the private debts of foreigners.”
When I read the explanations in the following three sources, the light bulb finally when on and I understood WHY Ron Paul calls for the FED to be
abolished. Congressman Wright Patman, head of the banking committee said
“The Federal Reserve Banks create money out of thin air to buy Government Bonds from the U.S. Treasury . . . [creating] out of nothing a . . . debt
which the American people are obliged to pay with interest.”
What amount of Government securities have the private banks acquired with bank-created money? Congressman Wright Patman answered that question
On January 31, 1964, all commercial banks in this country owned $62.7 billion in U.S. Government securities. The banks have acquired these securities
with bank-created money. In other words, the banks have used the Federal Government's power to create money without charge to lend $62.7 billion to
the Government at interest. On January 29, 1964, commercial banks had total assets amounting to $304.7 billion, and all of these had been paid for
with bank-created money, except $25.4 billion which had been paid for with their stockholders' capital. In other words, less than 10 percent of the
banks' assets have been acquired with money invested by stockholders in the banks. [pg 46]
That meant they got $279.3 billion dollars for FREE
they stole it from American citizens. Now that you understand that consider the amount of money the bankers are collecting from interest rates of 5%,
10,% or 30% on the money they printed out of thin air!!! On top of that the Federal Reserve pays the tab (with your taxes dollars) for any money
transfers, you know the electronic transfers they charge YOU $25.00 for? If over 90% of a bank's money was given to them by the government for free
so they could collect interest on it, can someone tell me how they managed to go bankrupt? Especially now when the banks use up to 97% fairy dust in
I think I know the answer. A friend won in court by proving that the credit card company's contract was null and void. Nothing of VALUE (credit IS
fairy dust) had been given to him by the bank so it was a one-sided illegal contract. I can not find the reference but I also read an article where
the same logic was used to reclaim a home in foreclosure. These cases set a legal precedence. The banks KNOW this is their Achille's heel that is why
the bank crisis was staged. The US government assumed liability for the debt! Nations can go bankrupt and are MUCH easier to scam than individuals,
after all it is not the politician's @$$ on the line.
According to Congressional record the U.S. Government can buy back the FED at any time for $450 million. That's about half the amount of money we
pay them daily. www.libertyforlife.com...
This scuttlebutt is certainly worth checking out. A PRIMER
MONEY: Congressional COMMITTEE ON BANKING AND CURRENCY indicate the idea at least is true.
Or it could be done this way
WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 1999
It has been said that the U.S. Government goes further into debt whenever it issues currency, but makes a profit when coins are placed into
circulation. This is truly a system that defies logic...The Treasury would issue these new U.S. notes through the banks, while withdrawing a like
amount of Federal Reserve notes. Thus, there would be no change in the money supply. As these Federal Reserve notes are collected by the U.S.
Treasury, they must be returned to the Fed to buy back or redeem the face value, the same face value in U.S. interest-bearing bonds now held by the
Fed, a total of about $500 billion. So over a couple of years, we would have real U.S. currency circulating, and the U.S. debt would be reduced by
substantially more than $400 [billion].
President Kennedy DID this using Executive Order
11110. Obama has the same ability
so why doesn't he follow in the footsteps of this great president. Afraid to get shot
his puppet masters perhaps?
We have a lot of legal options if we can get our supposed representatives to represent the interests of the American people instead of the Banks and
Corporations. Knowledge of these options so people will FORCE the repeal of some of this laws is the way to go. - - - read up and spread the word.
"Capitalists with government help are the worst of all economic phenomena." A. Rand
Rand was wrong, the absolute worst economic phenomena is "Capitalists with government help paid for by counterfeit money printed by Robber Baron