Birthers release forged Kenyan birth certificate for Obama

page: 6
28
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 03:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by lee anoma
...
Suck it up people, you're embarrassing yourselves.



- Lee




That's the rub right there man... they are incapable of embarrassment. They will howl like screech monkeys from now until the day he leaves the Whitehouse. Shame is in even shorter supply on the right than common sense.




posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 03:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by andrewh7

Originally posted by Riposte
Cool, so I guess Obama won't have any problem releasing the real long form birth certificate. Right?


I am sure people have told you this before. The short form certificate is the ONLY one the state of Hawaii will give you if you request a copy of your birth certificate - it is the official birth certificate of the State of Hawaii. The Department of Health has done TWO official statements on this issue. The Republican Governor of the State of Hawaii has even stated this. The original certificates are held by the Hawaiian Department of Health and are used to produce certified copies on demand from people who request them, such as what Obama did in 2007 when he was campaigning.

Please - ask for the long form again! Ask! Ask! Ask! If you shout and squint your eyes, perhaps you can reshape reality via will power alone. Let me know how that works out. If you want the law in Hawaii to change, lobby their state government. There is no way that Obama can get a document that no other Hawaiian citizen, except those with a tangible legal interest, can request without abusing his authority as the President.

I'm an attorney - please don't give me your own personal definition of "a tangible legal interest." The only definition that matters is the definition set by state legislators when they wrote the statute.

Hint: Irrational concern that Black man is the President is NOT "a tangible legal interest."



First of all,
You being an attorney hurts your credability, not enhances it.

Second,
Determining eligibility for POTUS is obviously a tangible legal interest.

What? Are you going to deny that Lawyer?

How about this? Obama Retakes Oath to Err on the side of Law
Even pulled a source from a liberal paper to ensure accuracy.

So, why would Obama (being a lawyer himself) have such an appreciation for law as to retake the oath of office because of a wording mistake yet he and his faithful obamabots do everything they can to conceal every record of his existance?

I'll tell you this.
Conspiracy theorists are heros. They don't blindly accept party lines. They seek the truth, they do so until they see enough facts to finally allay their suspicians.

This situation can easily be ended by showing the long form BC. I would say it is in the public interest to do so.

Besides, if I have to take off my shoes and get a full body search to fly thanks to the Patriot Act, I think it is reasonable for Obama to prove citizenship to be President of the United States.

Or do we have to go that easy on him because he's black?



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 04:57 AM
link   
reply to post by ActivePatriot
 


You are right!
And while you are at it, write a letter to national archives in washington, and tell them you need the original version of the constitution.

I mean we need it to verify if it actually says those things about being 35 and a natural born citizen right? We got a tangibel legal interest!



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 04:59 AM
link   




Im sorry I couldnt helpt myself...



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 07:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
The following quote is why the birthers will NEVER give up even if Obama does release his long form original BC. And this was never REALLY about his BC at all.



I just saw a video that said that even if Obama was born in the United States, he still wouldn't be natural born since we wasn't born to two American citizens. His dad was subject to the British crown.


Sadly these guys will be with us for the next 4/8 years.
Maybe they are practicing for 2012.


They can practice all they want. If they form a coalition with the anti-Federal Reserve people, the gold standard people and the "Henry Kissinger was born on Zeta Reticuli" people, they might scrape up 10,000 - 15,000 votes! Maybe they will support Orly for President.

[edit on 4-8-2009 by Office 4256]

[edit on 4-8-2009 by Office 4256]

[edit on 4-8-2009 by Office 4256]



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 08:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Southern Guardian
 


If she is the leader of their "birther" movement this discredits them even more, what a crackpot lonnie bin, she is ready for a padded cell and some new meds.

And just to make things even more hilarious she is a Russian Jew, flinging these absurdities at Obama, he is more American than her.



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 11:18 AM
link   
Y'all saw this too right?

The actual owner of the Birth Certificate from Australia gives an interview...


www.abc.net.au...


"It's so laughable, it's ridiculous!"



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 11:46 AM
link   


This "forgery" has given all of you - what name should we call you - "hatchers"(?) a great opportunity to deflect people away from the original and underlying issue - is obama legitimately president - but it does nothing to answer the underlying questions.

Oh, and I loved the sheeple comment earlier in the thread about if everyone in government, including the Supreme Court - says it's OK, it must be OK. Now you all believe everything the government says?


So, I guess there's no way for any of you to imagine the SCOTUS sitting there saying if we rule truthfully that obama shouldn't be president, this country will come apart, so we better just say obama is legitimate.




posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 12:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211


This "forgery" has given all of you - what name should we call you - "hatchers"(?) a great opportunity to deflect people away from the original and underlying issue - is obama legitimately president - but it does nothing to answer the underlying questions.

Oh, and I loved the sheeple comment earlier in the thread about if everyone in government, including the Supreme Court - says it's OK, it must be OK. Now you all believe everything the government says?


So, I guess there's no way for any of you to imagine the SCOTUS sitting there saying if we rule truthfully that obama shouldn't be president, this country will come apart, so we better just say obama is legitimate.



No offense, but doesn't this sound like nothing will convince you then if every authority of our current system isn't good enough to verify his legitimacy?

Lots of folks have said that nothing will make this go away, that the "birthers" will never concede no matter what.

And it's posts like yours which, I believe, fuels this sentiment.



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by HunkaHunka
 


And do you concede that the purpose of (all of) your posts is to make anything and everything anti-obama "go away"?






posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by HunkaHunka
 


And do you concede that the purpose of (all of) your posts is to make anything and everything anti-obama "go away"?





Not at all... the purpose of my posts are to find the truth as it relates to that which is being posited as evidence he was born in kenya.

Is it my fault that there is no evidence he wasn't born in hawaii?

Don't get me wrong... I think he makes mistakes too... that whole "police acted stupidly" was a hella mess up.

I'm just looking for honesty.

[edit on 4-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by HunkaHunka

Originally posted by centurion1211
reply to post by HunkaHunka
 


And do you concede that the purpose of (all of) your posts is to make anything and everything anti-obama "go away"?





Not at all... the purpose of my posts are to find the truth as it relates to that which is being posited as evidence he was born in kenya.

Is it my fault that there is no evidence he wasn't born in hawaii?

Don't get me wrong... I think he makes mistakes too... that whole "police acted stupidly" was a hella mess up.

I'm just looking for honesty.

[edit on 4-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]




You mean the truth as you see it.

And my previous post did not refer just to this thread ...

Happy to see that you can recognize that the police issue was an obamafailure.




posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 02:06 PM
link   
reply to post by centurion1211
 


Well, notice I said truth as it relates to documents which are posited as evidence.

I'm the first one to say there is no absolute truth.

However, that doesn't preclude one from working within a particular frame of reference, specifically the one in which exists a document exists which is being presented as something which is objectively not what it is purported to be.




And yep... I thought he messed up on the police thing to begin with.. but I thought the beer summit was a good idea from a leadership perspective.

I admire the ability of someone to admit their mistakes.

[edit on 4-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 02:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Make Speed Limit 45

Originally posted by HunkaHunka


So Orly Taitz, Dentist, Real Estate Agent, and newly minted Attorney comes up with a forgery that not even the Freepers are buying!!!



The board notes that the anti-birthers are so desperate they are reduced to attacking the lawyers over their prior occupations.


You mean CURRENT professions...www.drtaitz.com...

The implication is that she follows the money and given the number of websites she runs for birthers asking in size 30 bold font for donations...she has found yet another revenue stream.

She's an entrepenuer.



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 02:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by HunkaHunka
Y'all saw this too right?

The actual owner of the Birth Certificate from Australia gives an interview...


www.abc.net.au...


"It's so laughable, it's ridiculous!"



What makes you think his birth certificate was used? I mean, it differs in significant ways. Not what a hoaxer would bother or want to do, because it makes it easier for people to spot the differences, whereas a true hoaxer would want to minimise them by simply replacing Australian names by Kenyan ones. Far from its similarity being evidence that the Kenyan certificate was forged, its dissimilarity is evidence that the latter was NOT forged. Instead, the Australian one could be the forgery, prepared some time ago to be made public in the event that Obama's Kenyan certificate (or a copy) was ever leaked to the world.



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 02:20 PM
link   
If you look at the unique number (5733) that each BC is given... they both have the same typed in number.


That's just one reason.

[edit on 4-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by HunkaHunka


If you look at the unique number (5733) that each BC is given... they both have the same typed in number.


That's just one reason.

[edit on 4-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]


So what? Far from proving that the Obama certificate is forged, it could prove that the number of the Australian one has been changed by someone.



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 03:01 PM
link   
And, if not that, perhaps someone has found another birth certificate with the same number. Are you telling me, no birth certificates in two different countries can ever share the same number? LOL!



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 03:02 PM
link   
reply to post by micpsi
 


Ok whatever...





posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 03:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by debunky
reply to post by ActivePatriot
 


You are right!
And while you are at it, write a letter to national archives in washington, and tell them you need the original version of the constitution.

I mean we need it to verify if it actually says those things about being 35 and a natural born citizen right? We got a tangibel legal interest!



The Constitution is a well-established historical document which has been open to study since it was authored.

You and others are trying to divert deficiencies with Obama by attacking those who speak against him. Label them as right-wingers, tea-baggers, birthers, deathers.

Basically, nutballs or racists.

I'm none of those.

Does this Harvard Lawyer respect the laws of the United States?

All you have to do as look at the people he surrounds himself with.

If a man named Bush did the same things would you defend it?

Bush concealed much of his past, did you defend that?

What did you say about Bush's ties to Ken Leigh?
I bet you were all over that.

Obama basically endorsed Bush's torture policy, has not closed Gitmo, has not investigated torture, has not opened the Patriot Act for review or repeal, taken ownership of GM and thrown out hundreds of years of established bankruptcy laws, shoveled Trillions of dollars to financial institutions and voted for TARP.

He is attempting to rush through bills, which would do sweeping changes to our country with little debate (Bush style) and attacking critics the same way Bush did.

His appointees have been tax cheats, left wing extremists and avowed socialists.

He has associated himself with domestic terrorists and racists.

He rode in on people's hope that he would be something different.

He's not.

He's not an Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, John F Kennedy, Bill Clinton or Ronald Reagan.

He's a chameleon, an impersonator, a shape shifter

A fraud.

Do you support that?






top topics



 
28
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join