Birthers release forged Kenyan birth certificate for Obama, page 3

reply to post by HunkaHunka

---

Since dems seem to believe that 2 wrongs do make it right, then why do any of them have a problem if people release a "forged" birth certificate in response to the forged birth certificates already released by obama?

reply to post by GorehoundLarry

---

You're asking way too much of them. These people probably thought Reagan was a "pinko", the gold standard needs to be revived, etc. My advice is, don't start Birther websites with "fiat money" printed by the Illuminati influenced Federal Reserve. Just use the gold coins in the back of the bunker.

There are now multiple COLBs out there now with changed information

This modified one is showing jokes like: The Font of the Certificate=Schmutz (A Schmutz is a chump, as in you are a chump)
#5733=The number of the Certificate, is code for : "Problem with Windows REGISTRY", a sly reference to your claim that Obama does not appear on the Hawaii Live Birth Registry. 47O44=Easiest of all. BOH's age=47 0=O (if you look close you can tell that that is a Schmutz Font "Oh" not "Zero") EF Lavender is ORGANIC DISH SOAP

The original one does not say EF Lavender, it says KF Lavender. The original one shows the number is: 47,644.

defendourfreedoms.net...

reply to post by Stormdancer777

---

Hahahahaha Stormdancer.. posting a known hoax again is just pathetic and shows length birthers will go.

Best regards

Loke.:.

www.examiner.com...

Here is really all we know,

Orly is either nuts, or brave, maybe both,

Recently a Californian attorney, Orly Taitz, publicly released a copy of Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate. Taitz has filed a motion in the U.S. District Court for authenticating the document, but as of right now, the birth certificate appears authentic. As World News Daily reports, “No doctor is listed. But the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Oduya. It was allegedly used as a certified copy of the original in February 1964. WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical. Despite the fact that a hoax document similar in nature circulated the Internet last week, WND reports that the document ‘bears none of the obvious traits of a hoax.’”[5]

Taitz told WND:

“I filed the motion with the court asking for expedited discovery, which would allow me to start subpoenas and depositions even before Obama and the government responds.

I am asking the judge to give me the power to subpoena the documents from the Kenyan embassy and to require a

deposition from Hillary Clinton so they will be forced to authenticate [the birth certificate].

”[6] The birth certificate was discovered by an anonymous source, who feared publicity because of the possibility of retaliation.[7]

reply to post by Uniceft17

---

It is easy, really.

There were too many questions about the Hawaii CoLB that did not add up.

The Kenya BC is adding up perfectly.

reply to post by Lemon.Fresh

---

In other word, the data that fits your preconceptions must be correct.

Wonderful logic there

reply to post by xmotex

---

No, not in other words. I put it exactly how I wanted it.

There were/are questions on the CoLB that were not answered, or did not add up. There were too many FACTS missing

There were questions on the Kenya BC that did not add up (and the thread was put on [HOAX] status . . . but those questions were answered with FACTS.


I go for FACTS, friend, not BS.

[edit on 8/3/2009 by Lemon.Fresh]

reply to post by Lemon.Fresh

---

Oh really?

Seems their are more indications this thing is forged.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by Lemon.Fresh

---

[edit on 3-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]

BTW, that original Salon article has been updated several times...

Check it out again here...





[edit on 3-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]

reply to post by HunkaHunka

---

Everyone answered. Apparently you have half the thread on ignore

reply to post by Uniceft17

---

Oh really?

That seems to be be a load of hogwash, as everything SG stated has been proven false with facts and sources

Originally posted by xmotex
reply to post by Lemon.Fresh

---

In other word, the data that fits your preconceptions must be correct.

Wonderful logic there

Hypocrisy warning ...

But again, how many times was that exact "logic" used against the previous administration? "Bush lied" for example, when he was just relying on his "experts". Or how many dems still believe Palin really said "I can see Russia from my house" just because it fit their preconceptions?

As I said before, is your memory really that short that you think this is all somehow different than what has happened previously?

DEA is Investigating Montana State Legislators Over State Laws
  Posted 11 days ago with 59 member flags

US threatens Sweden with watch list sanctions if they don’t prosecute The Pirate Bay.
  Posted 6 days ago with 20 member flags

The CIA in Australia: America\'s Foreign Watergate
  Posted 1 days ago with 17 member flags

Who is really behind the birthers and what is their real motive?
  Posted 10 days ago with 11 member flags

ESF and Black op funding.
  Posted 9 days ago with 11 member flags

There is NO Media Bias in America
  Posted 9 days ago with 10 member flags

Medical Scientists & Doctors Finally Stand Up To The Feds: Suing Them For Spying
  Posted 12 days ago with 7 member flags

WW2 US mutiny in Australia by African-Americans soldiers uncovered
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: