Originally posted by Hazelnut
reply to post by Avenginggecko
Oh I get it now. Viral marketing campaigns at work causing emotional/patriotic uproar to increase profit margins. Makes sense too.
Now all we need is proof!
I'm going to take a page out of birther logic and put the burden of proof on the defendant, and not the accuser.
So, you produce financial documents showing Taitz, WND, Berg, etc. haven't gotten obscenely rich for playing off of people's ignorance and I'll believe you...once a court verifies that they haven't been laundering money somewhere, an IRS agent personally verifies their financials, and they have their tax information printed from the IRS and posted to the web.
Until then, the WND birth certificate highway billboards, the ad campaign against Obama, the increased traffic to the WND site, the media exposure Taitz and Berg has received from this whole circus, and the donations and product revenue WND receives from "concerned" citizens is proof enough to me that the ignorant are getting scammed.
Are you starting to see why the birth conspiracy logic is so ridiculous and why hearsay does not make a case? Or perhaps why courts require plaintiffs to prove their case before demanding defendants prove their innocence?
It is more of an attack on the public face of a hidden group of
bad people. Personally I think that a group of people should be constantly trying to rebuke their leader....If the leader is worthy he will be forced
to mold to the people, not the other way around.
