reply to post by 3DPrisoner
So we're back to the Zionists = Nazis argument again?
I've read a bit more about this case, and I've tried to summarize it below.
Jordan invaded East Jerusalem in 1948 and seized ownership of the land. Jordan then made a deal with the UNRWA who built the housing compound in 1959.
The intention was the let them to 27 Palestinian families for a nominal rent for three years, and then ownership would be transferred to the families.
The ownership was never transferred (not sure why), and so when Israel retook the area in 1967 control of the land was transferred to an organisation
called the Israeli Custodian for Absentee Property (i.e. property that Jordan had sat on and original ownership was unclear).
In 1972 two organisations - Sephardic Community Committee and Knesset Israel Committee - went to court to get ownership transferred to them based on
pre-1948 deeds. They then sold the property on to Shimon International in 2003 (I think).
Various court orders, attempts to evict families for non payment of rent, etc, take place between then and now. It gets a bit complicated. Some
excellent research has been done
here.
Ultimately this does seem to be a case of big business versus the little guy, and I agree definitely doesn't help to repair the damage between these
two communities. All seems (legally) above board though, I don't have a problem with the ruling itself.
And to the above poster, if I'd been living in a property for that long and knowingly not paid any rent, then yes I'd expect to get evicted at some
point.
I wonder why the UNRWA didn't transfer ownership when they were supposed to, would have saved all this hassle.