It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GingerR
Holy crap people really? The Kenyan FAKE one is so wrong! Did you not notice that the Republic of Kenya didn't exist on the date of the FAKE BC? Did you not notice the city it marks was NOT in Kenya at that date?
Any one? Any one?
One of my friends in the small community of Obama “birther”-debunkers passes on quite the discovery: a 1964 “certified copy of registration of birth” from Australia, easily available on Bomford.net, a genealogy site. There are striking similarities between this document and the one Orly Taitz is passing off as a “Kenyan birth certificate” for Barack Obama.
Originally posted by squidboy
Please look at the lines in the negative of the Australian document I posted above.
They are not effected by the folds.
It looks like the Australian Document may be a fake too, the lines do not move with the folds. This is apparent in the negative. I just posted.
i188.photobucket.com...
Shouldn't the lines be disturbed?
[edit on 4-8-2009 by squidboy]
Originally posted by GingerR
reply to post by Mikey84
How do you debunk a nation that didn't exist with a city that was in a different nation? Clearly its a fake. Or did the Africans not know where they were, kind of like when we "found" America and the Native People didn't know where they were?
Originally posted by HunkaHunka
reply to post by Mikey84
The Australian one has more markings of a real BC than the Kenyan..
I don't see anything debunking the Real Original (Australian) BC.
Besides it actually came from a genealogy site and has been there for quite some time...
Explanation of the Australian Template
One of my friends in the small community of Obama “birther”-debunkers passes on quite the discovery: a 1964 “certified copy of registration of birth” from Australia, easily available on Bomford.net, a genealogy site. There are striking similarities between this document and the one Orly Taitz is passing off as a “Kenyan birth certificate” for Barack Obama.
The original is on Bomford.net which is now out of downloads for this month because of folks like us...
www.bomford.net...
[edit on 4-8-2009 by HunkaHunka]
Originally posted by Uniceft17
reply to post by GLDNGUN
Inverted original:
At first glance it does look super imposed over the original, I am no image expert so you will have to look for yourself and make up your own conclusion. But in my opinion it doesn't look tampered with. Look at the e over the fold that I circled comapred to the other e's they don't match the e on the fold but the other e's match eachother, and the a on the fold that I circled appears to be drooping slightly on the left from the fold im guessing. Take a look
If you want to see what im talking about save the image to your hardrive zome in and inspect the areas that i've circled and compare. From what I see at first glance it does look super imposed but after further inspection you can tell that it has been folded by comparing the e's, but don't take my word for it, see for yourself and come to a conclusion.
Originally posted by GLDNGUN
The image is NOT in indexed in the Wayback Machine so there's no way to determine how long that image was there.
Originally posted by Uniceft17
Here's another image of 2 of the same letters from the paragraph in question.
The first e is from the fold in the on the third line of the paragraph, the second e is from the same paragraph only it isn't over a fold, it this picture you can clearly tell that it isn't super imposed over the paper, but actually on the paper.