It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Photo - Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate (political fraud)

page: 44
182
<< 41  42  43    45  46  47 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:03 AM
link   
5. This piece of paper certainly looks nice and new to be 45 years old -- unless the Kenyans were using acid-free paper back in 1964. Heh, heh.

6. Finally, Officials of Coast Province General Hospital reported: “We do not have computerized records going back to the 1960’s and can only sort through our archives by hand,” Dr. Christopher Mwanga, an administrator at the Mombasa hospital tells GLOBE. “We have searched for all the names of babies born on Aug. 4, 1961, and have not found the name of Barack Hussein Obama. That is all I can tell you.”

My BC is older than that and is in better condition.
Was said BC was in some Law office, they keep things pretty neat most times, but this makes me wonder why it is folded.
My BC is not folded.

No. 6 They need to find the book his name would be in BOOK 44B ,Page 5733, Oh sorry that page seems to have been misplaced. Oh I mean that Book was stolen some time Back.




posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mikey84

Originally posted by SimplyTactful
It's a fake. Because:

1. Says "Republic of Kenya" but is dated February 1964. Kenya did not become a republic until 12 December 1964. Ooops.


This has been discussed, go back and read it.


Originally posted by SimplyTactful

2. The document is dated 5 August 1964 -- a Saturday. From what I can find, Kenyan guvmint offices close early on Friday and are closed on Saturdays. Oooops.


The document doesn’t have that date on it, it says the Registration date of 5 August 1961, not 1964. And it’s the registration date, which can be done on any day. Mine is registered on a Sunday, but Irish government is not open on a Sunday.

Mikey


Thats it?



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:06 AM
link   
reply to post by PieKeeper
 
Says he was born in Hosiptal there, what did they move hosiptal,?



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:09 AM
link   
reply to post by GLDNGUN
 


Well, it doesn't matter who did, since we won't know.

Though, GLDN, the motto on ATS is "Deny Ignorance."

I showed the evidence up that Obama was against those divorce files being used.

You, though, showed nothing.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:12 AM
link   
reply to post by googolplex
 


No reason to be rude. I see now that it does say Coast General Hospital. I was explaining how his birth could have been registered.

Does anyone know what it says under Coast General Hospital?



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:15 AM
link   
reply to post by Mak Manto
 


Yea and Obama also didn't want to run auto companies, and he also didn't want to spend a trillion dollars into the economy, and he also said this was going to be the most transparent administration ever. Obama has said a lot of things that aren't true. So what is your point?

The truth is the man is hiding something, and that something is big. Whether he was born here or not, is I admit a distraction. The real meat and potato's is what about his college transcripts. The proof is in those, because from what I can gather after following this issue, is that we will never know where he was born.

The picture in the OP, if fake, proves how easy it is to fake a bc, so why should be believe anything coming from either the lawyer or Obama?

I don't really trust either of them.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:16 AM
link   
It's also "typed" in the SCHMUTZ font. Schmutz font was created in 1995.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:16 AM
link   
reply to post by PieKeeper
 

Sorry if I rude , ididn't know maybe they did move hosiptal, I was just checking.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimplyTactful

Originally posted by Mikey84

Originally posted by SimplyTactful
It's a fake. Because:

1. Says "Republic of Kenya" but is dated February 1964. Kenya did not become a republic until 12 December 1964. Ooops.


This has been discussed, go back and read it.


Originally posted by SimplyTactful

2. The document is dated 5 August 1964 -- a Saturday. From what I can find, Kenyan guvmint offices close early on Friday and are closed on Saturdays. Oooops.


The document doesn’t have that date on it, it says the Registration date of 5 August 1961, not 1964. And it’s the registration date, which can be done on any day. Mine is registered on a Sunday, but Irish government is not open on a Sunday.

Mikey


Thats it?


Yep, your first two points were flawed - and copied and pasted from somewhere else.... was there really a need for me to go on and point out the rest?

Mikey



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimplyTactful
It's also "typed" in the SCHMUTZ font. Schmutz font was created in 1995.


I just debunked this. Page 43, bottom of the page. It's Prestige Elite, created in 1953.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mikey84

Originally posted by SimplyTactful

Originally posted by Mikey84

Originally posted by SimplyTactful
It's a fake. Because:

1. Says "Republic of Kenya" but is dated February 1964. Kenya did not become a republic until 12 December 1964. Ooops.


This has been discussed, go back and read it.


Originally posted by SimplyTactful

2. The document is dated 5 August 1964 -- a Saturday. From what I can find, Kenyan guvmint offices close early on Friday and are closed on Saturdays. Oooops.


The document doesn’t have that date on it, it says the Registration date of 5 August 1961, not 1964. And it’s the registration date, which can be done on any day. Mine is registered on a Sunday, but Irish government is not open on a Sunday.

Mikey


Thats it?


and copied and pasted from somewhere else....

Mikey


Clearly your logic is "flawed" if you come up with conclusions like that.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by netwarrior

Originally posted by SimplyTactful
It's also "typed" in the SCHMUTZ font. Schmutz font was created in 1995.


I just debunked this. Page 43, bottom of the page. It's Prestige Elite, created in 1953.


Awesome. Good job.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by PieKeeper
reply to post by googolplex
 


No reason to be rude. I see now that it does say Coast General Hospital. I was explaining how his birth could have been registered.

Does anyone know what it says under Coast General Hospital?


Mombasa or something like that



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:23 AM
link   
Who cares?

The Constitution isn't even respected anymore. What makes you people think that the government is going to reverse the Patriot Act and honor the Constitution?

It's a dead piece of paper.

Also, you people and Orly Taitz make me sick. You can't handle the Presidency of Obama but you'd probably be happy if that McCain shmuck was President, even though he was born in friggin' Panama.

[edit on 3-8-2009 by Janitor From Mars]



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Mak Manto
reply to post by GLDNGUN
 


Well, it doesn't matter who did, since we won't know.

Though, GLDN, the motto on ATS is "Deny Ignorance."

I showed the evidence up that Obama was against those divorce files being used.

You, though, showed nothing.


You showed evidence? Did I miss it?

And do you believe everything politicians in general say? Or just Obama?



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:25 AM
link   
I'm a so-called 'birther' (what a silly name) and I have some doubts on this document.

Looking at the picture, some things come to mind:

The shadow of the document doesn't match the shadow on the seal. They go in different directions. The document shadow seems to be going to the lower right, and the seal shadow seems to be going to the lower left. Is it my eyes? (possible)

It would be a heck of a lot easier to fake text on a straight on shot of the document rather than the odd angle its at.

Possibly my eyes playing tricks on me, but some of the lines and alignment seem off. Where most of the lines seem to continue on the same horizontal path across teh form, there is an odd alignment between teh columns after the mother's section

The lines and text do appear to follow the folds/creases

There's some fantastic detail on the cloth backdrop

the unintelligible word typed in after "District of" is crooked compared to the rest, but parallel with the horizontal plane, which the certificate is not.

it seems it would be easier or more effective to make a fake certificate with a desktop printer, age it artificially, and then take a photo of it rather than photoshop an existing picture.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:31 AM
link   
why isn't this all over FOX News and the like?



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimplyTactful

and copied and pasted from somewhere else....

Clearly your logic is "flawed" if you come up with conclusions like that.


But you did copy and paste your post from somewhere else, here are a few sites the same can be found on.

Here

Oh and here too

Lets not forget here

What about here

And even over here

Would you like me to go on?

Mikey


[edit on 3/8/2009 by Mikey84]



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Just Cause
why isn't this all over FOX News and the like?


It might be soon , heard it was on Lou Dobbs the other day as becomes more main stream, down here on main street, main street, main street.



[edit on 3-8-2009 by googolplex]



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 01:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by googolplex

Originally posted by Just Cause
why isn't this all over FOX News and the like?


It might be soon , heard it was on Lou Dobbs the other day as becomes more main stream, down here on main street, main street, main street.


Would that be 123 or 1234 Main St. - or 123 White House Lane? Heh-heh.



new topics

top topics



 
182
<< 41  42  43    45  46  47 >>

log in

join