You want absolute proof the media is controlled? , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 2-8-2009 @ 01:45 AM by shug7272
Link



It was perhaps the fiercest media feud of the decade and by this year, their bosses had had enough. But it took a fellow television personality with a neutral perspective to help bring it to at least a temporary end.

At an off-the-record summit meeting for chief executives sponsored by Microsoft in mid-May, the PBS interviewer Charlie Rose asked Jeffrey Immelt, chairman of G.E., and his counterpart at the News Corporation, Rupert Murdoch, about the feud.


Really I dont know what else to say but, "there ya go." Both of these men are sold as newsmen and their networks sold as news networks, so what in the hell is this? The sponsors censor the newsmen?

vids.myspace.com...

[edit on 2-8-2009 by shug7272]


reply posted on 2-8-2009 @ 04:04 AM by orwellianunenlightenment
reply to post by prevenge


You're right. It is irritating, but it is self-destructive to get too nauseated, because it distracts from what must get done. I say this as I momentarily get nauseated all the time. I have to consciously choose to forget it. Keep the faith brother.

Divide and conquer mindset: We pick the systems, two of them. You get to choose between the two. You then think you made the original choice. We pick the stories, the tunes to which you can dance. We even present 2 tunes, to give you variety. You then think you chose your own tune. Meanwhile, we dance to another tune, the tune of deception and division. We split that tune in half, and give you the leftovers. We put your 2 lower tunes together, and they form our harmonious tune, that tune of deception and division. We perpetuate the cycle of deception and division through as many cycles as possible, hoping you will not realize that this ugly harmony is the very reason for the repetition of cycles eating themselves, only to birth the same cycle again under a different name. Being a parasite is so glorious.

Edit: I think you indicated that you know it leads to what is better, even though it temporarily creates what is worse. Once division and deception are so manifestly obvious, and the cycles occur with such a frequency that people are aware of their only choice, then things will get better. It can't happen soon enough.

[edit on 2-8-2009 by orwellianunenlightenment]


reply posted on 2-8-2009 @ 05:18 AM by Kaytagg
reply to post by joe_dirt976


Nice post.

I happen to think there is a conspiracy.

Just look at how the MSM treated Ron Paul during the 2008 presidential debates. You can't tell me they don't have an agenda going on, when everybody smears the candidate that actually wants to change things up in Washington.

And there is always the famous Monsanto Fox News scandal.

Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A MUST Read, "Written By A Female Cop"
  Posted 4 days ago with 34 member flags
***Programming The Nation FULL Video- Limited Time Only!!***
  Posted 0 days ago with 21 member flags
Know your enemy ... the Daily Mail & Viscount Rothermere
  Posted 14 days ago with 17 member flags
Pictures That Shocked The World (viewer discretion advised)
  Posted 3 days ago with 12 member flags