It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9 11 The Whole World Knows Even The French Get It ( 1) (9/11 TRUTH SERIES)

page: 6
43
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 08:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by ipsedixit


Here is a link to one of Mylène Farmer's videos. I'm not embedding it because it is a little racy, but it might encourage people to look into French pop which has some great material. She's described as a combination of Madonna and Kate Bush. I just use the word yummy myself.

www.youtube.com...



[edit on 3-8-2009 by ipsedixit]


I`ll see your Mylène Farmer and raise you an Alizée...

www.youtube.com...




posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 08:48 AM
link   
i haven't read the thread properly so in case it has already been mentionned, apologize.

i am french, leaving abroad but in france since a few month now.

let me tell you that, and sorry if it does disappoint your early conclusions about this country:

french people don't have a clue about 911 lies.

this comic has been ridiculed all over the media for its statements. he was also obliged by sarkozy himself to apologize publicly for this,

and anyone who attempts to say something about 911 get the same treatment.

the situation of the french media is overly dramatic as they all belong to weapon sellers (dassault, lagardere mainly), they don't have any editorial independence whatsoever. their content is full of propaganda everyday stigmatizing on whoever would ask question about 911 (sectarism, insanity, personal attacks ect)

the truth about the lies is indeed further away to be revealed in france than it is in the us.

since i'm here, in france, i've been talking about it to many people that pretends to be leftist, informed and aware about politics and social injustice.

for the vast majority of them (i'd say 90 to 95%) i'm a lunatic that has lost grip with reality and their common answer is, when i ask them to see and look for themselves and stop trusting mass media, "i let the seeking the truth job to journalists as they do it better than me". then they try to change discussion topic if they don't get simply too much angry with me, physically running away (i've lost many friends lately i believe because of those discussions, not joking).

so frustratring and terrifying about their condition, i confess i kind of gave up trying to make them aware because otherwise nobody will talk to me anymore; hopefully they'll wake up though... how and when i'm not too sure...

[edit on 3-8-2009 by ::.mika.::]



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 09:41 AM
link   
To Seventh:

I'm totally with you on Alizée. I have never seen a cuter little lady in my life. She came straight down on the bullet train from heaven. Yikes!

Strangely enough, I got turned on to her because her song "Contre Courant", was used as the sound track on a short video by a photographer from (of all places) Texas. That started a progression that led, via "Ella Elle L'a!" to France Gall, Serge Gainsbourg, Françoise Hardy, Michel Berger, Vanessa Paradis (Johnny Depp's wife), Miréille (Mimi) Mathieu and . . . I just keep on digging and loving it.

I could link to a lot of great ones but here is (great genius, sadly passed away, also France Gall's husband) Michel Berger's "Paradis Blanc":

(This one demands to be embedded, just to show people what beauty comes from France.)



To Mika:

Do you know how the story of that professor from the École de Guerre turned out? The one who was dismissed for writing a book questioning the American government's story about 9/11.


Le 5 février dernier, cet enseignant de géopolitique a été congédié par le ministre de la Défense à la suite d'un article paru dans Le Point. Chauprade est l'auteur d'un livre "Chronique du choc des civilisations" dans lequel il présente avec complaisance les thèses qui attribuent les attentats du 11 septembre à un complot américano-israélien.



The above states basically that the professor was fired from his position at le Collège interarmées de défense (CID) which, I gather is the French equivalent to something like West Point, but maybe snootier, for publishing an article based on ideas developed in a book which support the notion that the 9/11 attack was an American/Israeli joint venture.


Here's a link to the thread from which the quotes are taken. It's a one page thread, easy reading.

www.abovetopsecret.com...


[edit on 3-8-2009 by ipsedixit]



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 10:05 AM
link   
reply to post by ipsedixit
 


Yes she is all woman and apparently is happily married with children
, I do feel I have to be perfectly honest here though and explain how I 1st stumbled across her... World of Warcraft and character dance origins the female Night Elf is blessed with those sexy moves.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 10:10 AM
link   
reply to post by ipsedixit
 


Thank you ipsedixit !
I will try to keep it short because we are off topic.

Yes, Swampfox should elaborate. In the link you provided, nowhere it says French officials took part in the document forgery.
One interesting source from the wiki page : French probe led to 'fake Niger uranium papers'
Martino was allegedly working for the British, French and Italian intelligence services. All 3 have indicated they could not authentify the documents. The only ones accused at one point to have forged the papers are the Italians.
Another useful link : Interview with Rocco Martino
I will add some sources believe Martino was working for Italy to spy on the French.
We will never know the truth, too many services are involved in a complicated story of intelligence/counter-intelligence/disinfo.

To me, it is clear Cheney knew this "proof" was forged but wanted to use it anyway, it was too good to go to garbage.

When you look at things, don't forget other countries perspective and own muddling with each other, it's something that is repeatedly underestimated. Without it, you can't get the full picture.

Legally and morally, Mylène is not yours. She's a human being standing by herself and she can go with whoever she wants. And you may never catch her



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 10:19 AM
link   
reply to post by ipsedixit
 


Chauprade was reintegrated. He has received huge support because he has a very high reputation and expertise.
He was not actually questionning 9/11 in his book but only taking in account that the belief 9/11 was an inside job was a puzzle part of nowadays geopolitics. But it was already going too far...
From what I have read from him, I believe he thinks it's an inside job but it's only my guess.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 10:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by Manouche
Legally and morally, Mylène is not yours. She's a human being standing by herself and she can go with whoever she wants. And you may never catch her


This is not about legality or morality. It is about lust and men turned into swine by a goddess. But you are right. I think she lives in California. I can't take it. At least I have her videos.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 10:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by Manouche
Martino was allegedly working for the British, French and Italian intelligence services. All 3 have indicated they could not authentify the documents. The only ones accused at one point to have forged the papers are the Italians.


I haven't really looked into this story in a serious way, so I accept what you are saying. It amazes me how much currency these papers had when everyone seems to have realized that they were fake.

I might point out though, that the difference between a counterfeiter and one who passes counterfeit money is only a few classes at a technical college.



We will never know the truth, too many services are involved in a complicated story of intelligence/counter-intelligence/disinfo.


This is very likely true.


To me, it is clear Cheney knew this "proof" was forged but wanted to use it anyway, it was too good to go to garbage.


I agree. Cheney is a very, very bad man.


When you look at things, don't forget other countries perspective and own muddling with each other, it's something that is repeatedly underestimated. Without it, you can't get the full picture.


This is absolutely correct. Thanks for the reminder.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 12:21 PM
link   
double post

[edit on 3-8-2009 by Manouche]



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 12:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by ipsedixit
I might point out though, that the difference between a counterfeiter and one who passes counterfeit money is only a few classes at a technical college.


Not when you pass it and warn it's counterfeit. Which is what the Brits, the French and the Italians did.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by ::.mika.::
i haven't read the thread properly so in case it has already been mentionned, apologize.

i am french, leaving abroad but in france since a few month now.

let me tell you that, and sorry if it does disappoint your early conclusions about this country:

french people don't have a clue about 911 lies.

this comic has been ridiculed all over the media for its statements. he was also obliged by sarkozy himself to apologize publicly for this,

and anyone who attempts to say something about 911 get the same treatment.

the situation of the french media is overly dramatic as they all belong to weapon sellers (dassault, lagardere mainly), they don't have any editorial independence whatsoever. their content is full of propaganda everyday stigmatizing on whoever would ask question about 911 (sectarism, insanity, personal attacks ect)

the truth about the lies is indeed further away to be revealed in france than it is in the us.

since i'm here, in france, i've been talking about it to many people that pretends to be leftist, informed and aware about politics and social injustice.

for the vast majority of them (i'd say 90 to 95%) i'm a lunatic that has lost grip with reality and their common answer is, when i ask them to see and look for themselves and stop trusting mass media, "i let the seeking the truth job to journalists as they do it better than me". then they try to change discussion topic if they don't get simply too much angry with me, physically running away (i've lost many friends lately i believe because of those discussions, not joking).

so frustratring and terrifying about their condition, i confess i kind of gave up trying to make them aware because otherwise nobody will talk to me anymore; hopefully they'll wake up though... how and when i'm not too sure...

[edit on 3-8-2009 by ::.mika.::]


Bonsoir Mika, merci beacoup pour ca.

Please keep trying. I know it is hard. I keep trying with the French side of my family, but they think I am insane too.

They just put their fingers in their ears.

Too bad the media conditioning works so well in France. Maybe it is time for a media revolution. Vive La France et Vive La Presse Libre!



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 05:39 PM
link   
many people when trying to get to the bottom of 911 instantly shout inside job when trying to get a new investigation

they try to show all this proof about what really happened

they try to point fingers at bush and dick and all the rest of the usual suspects

and they allow themselves to be ridiculed

they offer the U.S. the ammunition


instead, if you really want a new investigation

go about it more stealthily

instead of shouting for a new investigation to get these "inside job people"

just show the facts, show that its impossible for the towers to come down like that with jet fuel etc

show the things that show the 1st investigation has faults

show that the 1st one wasnt perfect and that all you want is simply the perfect true answer

if you dont instantly point fingers at the government and they still try to ridicule then its them who look stupid, not the truthers

because bottom line, WE DONT KNOW WHAT HAPPENED

we all have our ideas that its a inside job or its this or that

but we talk like we know when none of us do

all that we do know is the official answer isnt the true one

thats a pretty widely accepted stance on the situation


fight to find out what really happened, dont fight to prove its a inside job or you just fall into their conspiracy ridiculing

and then hopefully with a real investigation they will find out the truth and who was behind everything or at least some of the people who were involved

bottom line though its my opinion that as long as fingers are pointed at the U.S. government before a new investigation proves they were involved, a new investigation will never take place



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 07:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Militant1
Steel doesn't melt when over stressed it snaps, bends, twist, ect. in order for it to melt it would have to be trapped between two meduims stronger than itself. The pressure would have been enough to melt steel except before that happend the steel would have reached its stress point and failed, there by releasing the said pressure. Of note you might want to link those studies if you can, and its also noteworthy that this melting steel wasn't noticed in any other buildings that collasped, before 9/11.


Thanks for elaborating, I didn't intend what I said to be anywhere near a complete analysis.


I'm not trying to win the truthers argument for them, i am an engineer and niether me nor my coworkers have been able to figure out how those towers collasped the way they did. Its not just us but many in the field dare not speak the truth, theres alot more to this than we know. I am sorry to say the overall mechanics is wrong. Its doesn't work on paper and computer models will not recreate it as it happend.


If that is the case it is difficult for anyone to accept that, unless these computer simulations are debunked sufficiently.



posted on Aug, 3 2009 @ 07:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jezus

Originally posted by john124
I go with the facts and evidence, which has been explained sufficiently many years ago.


You are supporting "facts" that are contradictory to observable science.





Originally posted by john124
I accept the evidence



You should not accept evidence...you should analyze it.


OK, rather I accepted proof, or what appeared to be proof from a number of compotent engineers and scientists. I have not yet seen anybody explain what was incorrect with the computer models in any kind of sufficient detail to make me think these are wrong. I may have assumed certain evidence had already been analysed correctly, as there has been no logical debunking attempted or at least demonstrated yet.


Instead of believing...use critical thinking and understand.


I wouldn't call it believing, I would call it more of a trust in certain scientists that they know how to do their job. From my point of view, these models appear to be accurate. There is no way that anybody can rigorously analyse every single piece of evidence that science has to offer, there just isn't enough time for that. Peer-review can do that, and I would accept peer-reviewed data.

By understanding these models to a reasonable degree using critical thinking I can only determine that they are accurate, unless they can be adequately debunked. That may be possible, but I'm still waiting for that to happen.


[edit on 3-8-2009 by john124]



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 03:44 PM
link   
Unfortunatly the french people are still asleep concerning 9/11. The youth does realise something is wrong because they surf on the internet. The adults lives in their cocoon.
I have also family over there, myself I am Belgian. Don't ask.
I do found it hard to convince people so I stopped trying. But I do give them free choice. I show them when a plain is spreading his poison in the air (chemtrails) and ask them what will happen (I did not mentioned poison or chemtrails) . They say it will disapear, after a couple of minutes they notice that it does not dissapear. Then they ask me questions. Do not give them the info in the hand but give them a free choice and respect their choice.

Never impose your beliefs like some famous persons now are doing. One thing you may never doubt about, everybody will know the truth when the time's right. Do not doubt. Share your joy and love, not fear ! Focus on positive things, not the bad things !

A thing I must tell, someone mentioned "french fries" in the beginning of this thread. To french : to cut into slivers or thin strips before cooking, to prepare for cooking by slicing it into strips and pounding etc...
Many people believes that it comes from France but it does not. Belgium is the origin. Not the patato, but the fries that derives from it.
On Wikipedia you will find other explanations, including the Belgian one. One fact is that it is not from France. In belgium you have also french speaking people and flamisch speaking people.
There is also a confusion about the grammar, some are writing "franch" and sothers "french". You figure it out !

And because some are embedding a musicvideo, I will do the same if I may. It's a boy from Quebec that started at the age of 7 in a childrens program, at 8 he sang with Celine Dion life (he was very sick at that time, you can hear this when he singing low... the poor boy), at 9 he had his first full album available in the stores.
His name : Francis Bernier
If the video does not appear : www.youtube.com...




Other vids of him :

A song from his album : Tout commence par un rêve :
www.youtube.com...

Arbre mon ami : www.youtube.com...


As last another group named KYO, this one is from France, the video is not the original, the music is : Je te vends mon âme : www.youtube.com...



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 04:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by john124
I have not yet seen anybody explain what was incorrect with the computer models in any kind of sufficient detail to make me think these are wrong.


The explanations are all around you...


Originally posted by john124
I may have assumed certain evidence had already been analysed correctly



Originally posted by john124
I would call it more of a trust in certain scientists that they know how to do their job.


Stop assuming you can trust the government and analyze the evidence yourself...

The only thing standing between you and the truth is preconceived notions and a lack of effort...



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 09:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jezus

Originally posted by john124
I have not yet seen anybody explain what was incorrect with the computer models in any kind of sufficient detail to make me think these are wrong.


The explanations are all around you...


The problem with that, is that they AREN'T!!!


Originally posted by john124
I may have assumed certain evidence had already been analysed correctly



Originally posted by john124
I would call it more of a trust in certain scientists that they know how to do their job.



Stop assuming you can trust the government and analyze the evidence yourself...


I said I put trust in Science, not the government. So please stop with your silliness and read what I put.


The only thing standing between you and the truth is preconceived notions and a lack of effort...


Excuse me.... I do actually have better things to do than analyse something which appears to be adequately explained already. I'm not an engineer, and people who claim to be engineers are saying that the WTC steel could not have melted due to the collapse. It's funny how those who claim to be engineers don't think they need to provide adequate evidence to support their assumptions.

Are you an engineer??? If not then why do you think you can do the job of an engineer/scientist better than engineers/scientists??? Surely you could be mistaken due to a lack of scientific or mathematical knowledge!?

If you are an engineer.... then please provide adequate proof of govt lies or the specifics of what you believe, such as the steel not melting during collapse etc? And by adequate I mean proof that contains correct rigorous scientific procedures, without a basis in conjecture.

What "you" seem to call adequate evidence, I call conjecture - because that's all we've had on this thread, and it's unmistakenly conjecture. I have a degree level education in a scientific field, so it's pretty easy to understand what is considered proof, and what is conjecture. That also allows me to understand the various reports to enough of a level to understand what is correct and incorrect, even if I don't have the full expertise. Therefore I can see what is blatent rubbish in "truthers" reports, and what makes absolute sense in the govt. reports.

And what you ignore is overwhelming evidence which is considered to be proof from many engineers and scientists that support the govt. findings.

Proof is more than a bunch of opinions and I'm still waiting for those skeptical engineers to come forward with an actual report that makes sense. And I don't mean those people on here that claim to be engineers and then piss off never to return with their so-called evidence, or those who link to a website with no credibility or just show a complete lack of scientific knowledge.

Next time actually read what I typed, and don't reply with this pathetic arrogance when somebody is giving you a perfectly logical reason why they feel the govt. answers related to the WTC collapsing makes much more sense than any other discussed outcomes. As it just makes you look completely ignorant.

And don't assume somebody is ignorant because they haven't done their own actual research individually. Have you???!!!!! Have most people?!!!! Probably not!!!! And by research I don't mean thinking about it and deciding based on feelings, emotions & gut feelings!!! And I don't mean a limited opinionated analysis leaving a conclusion based on conjecture.

Peer-reviewed science is there for properly done research to be assessed..... and there is not one single engineer or scientist in the world who understands every single field to a complete extent. So it's unlikely you can tell me anymore than those particular experts have already said, unless you are one yourself.

But it's highly unlikely you would have to try and convince me using conjecture on ATS, you would produce a valuable report instead. And that's what we are all waiting for in order to see adequate proof that debunks the govt. view.

Do you not put trust in science when you eat your dinner, brush your teeth, wash your hair etc! You put trust in those who designed those products - that they are fit to consume and use!!!

The same applies to the many engineers who have analysed the WTC collapse and agree that steel would have melted during the collapse.

I'm not going to claim all engineers agree, but those that don't have not adequately provided a counter-argument that goes beyond "we know it couldn't have happened" or just wild conjecture & speculation.

And taking parts of my posts out of context and trying to make it look like I blindly followed the govt. without using any form of critical thinking first is completely shallow, and is becoming more common by those people who are blind deniers of anything the govt. says, however obviously truthful it is. And the same goes for most believers, rather than prove their beliefs, they would bash the dis-believers in a most illogical fashion.

Some Americans would still cry out their govt was lying, even if they said aliens exist and 9/11 was an inside job. They would probably start claiming something else was also true, and they'd never be happy. IMO I think it's some form of psychosis that the modern man can inherit from a lack of critical thinking and paranoia.

[edit on 4-8-2009 by john124]



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 10:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by john124

I said I put trust in Science, not the government.


Your point of view suggests the exact opposite.


Originally posted by john124
I do actually have better things to do than analyse something which appears to be adequately explained already.


At least you admit it...

If you don't have time to do some critical thinking your opinion doesn't mean much...

[edit on 4-8-2009 by Jezus]



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 10:30 PM
link   
reply to post by john124
 


My question is, don't people realise that steel does not need to melt to weaken? It's a progressive thing, the more you heat up steel the less it can structurally hold. Add to that the fact that the still existing parts would be holding up what the broken parts could not you have an recipe for what happend.



posted on Aug, 4 2009 @ 10:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Jezus
 


Meet your logical fallacy: ad hominem

An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the man", "argument against the man") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim.

The process of proving or disproving the claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.




top topics



 
43
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join