It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by acmpnsfal
reply to post by acrux
Not true, Rome was the first gov't to really put together and spread what we would call the mainstream "bible"
Originally posted by acmpnsfal
reply to post by Rockpuck
I understand what he is saying but what I was trying to say is that what he made was a moot point because even though Christianity formed during that time there was a period before Rome was instrumental in its practices so I think the term "pre-Rome" still applies.
On the Detection and Overthrow of the So-Called Gnosis (Greek: λεγχος και άνατροπή της ψευδωνύμου γνώσεως), commonly called Against Heresies (Latin: Adversus haereses, Greek: κατ αρέσεων), is a five-volume work written by St. Irenaeus in the second century. Due to his assertion that Eleutherus was the current bishop of Rome, the work is usually dated c. 180. In it Irenaeus identifies and describes several schools of gnosticism and contrasts their beliefs with what he describes as catholic, orthodox Christianity. Only fragments of the original Greek text exist, but a complete copy exists in a wooden Latin translation, made shortly after its publication in Greek, and Books IV and V are also present in a literal Armenian translation.
The purpose of Against Heresies was to refute the teachings of various Gnostic groups; apparently, several Greek merchants had begun an oratorial campaign praising the pursuit of "gnosis" in Irenaeus' bishopric. Another popular theory states that a group of Gnostics known as the Valentinians remained part of the early Christian church, taking part in regular church celebrations despite their radical differences. It is also said that Gnostics would secretly meet outside of regular church activity where they would discuss their "secret knowledge" and scripture that pertains to it. As bishop, Irenaeus felt obligated to keep a close eye on the Valentinians and to safeguard the church from them. In order to fulfil this duty, Irenaeus educated himself and became well informed of Gnostic doctrines and traditions. This eventually led to the compilation of his treatise.
It appears however, that the main reason Irenaeus took on this work was because he felt that Christians in Asia and Phrygia especially needed his protection from Gnostics, for they did not have as many bishops to oversee and help keep problems like this under control (probably only one bishop was assigned to a number of communities). Therefore, due to the issue of distance between Irenaeus (who was in the western Roman province of Gaul) and the orthodox Christian community of Asia, Irenaeus found that writing this treatise would be the best way to offer them guidance.
Until the discovery of the Library of Nag Hammadi in 1945, Against Heresies was the best surviving description of Gnosticism.
Originally posted by defcon5
It is easily provable, through at least one existent writing, that the early church fathers were aware of Gnosticism, and were fighting to keep it from spreading within Christianity.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
This is the question, why would this orthodox version of Christianity move to keep this information hidden from their church?
Originally posted by badmedia
Pre-roman christian is referring to the time period before the Romans took it up, and then proceeded to kill anyone who didn't go along with their version.
Jesus was a gnostic.
Proverbs 9
1Wisdom hath builded her house, she hath hewn out her seven pillars:
2She hath killed her beasts; she hath mingled her wine; she hath also furnished her table.
3She hath sent forth her maidens: she crieth upon the highest places of the city,
4Whoso is simple, let him turn in hither: as for him that wanteth understanding, she saith to him,
5Come, eat of my bread, and drink of the wine which I have mingled.
6Forsake the foolish, and live; and go in the way of understanding.
7He that reproveth a scorner getteth to himself shame: and he that rebuketh a wicked man getteth himself a blot.
8Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee.
9Give instruction to a wise man, and he will be yet wiser: teach a just man, and he will increase in learning.
10The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.
Proverbs 8
Doth not wisdom cry? and understanding put forth her voice?
2She standeth in the top of high places, by the way in the places of the paths.
3She crieth at the gates, at the entry of the city, at the coming in at the doors.
4Unto you, O men, I call; and my voice is to the sons of man.
5O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart.
6Hear; for I will speak of excellent things; and the opening of my lips shall be right things.
7For my mouth shall speak truth; and wickedness is an abomination to my lips.
8All the words of my mouth are in righteousness; there is nothing froward or perverse in them.
9They are all plain to him that understandeth, and right to them that find knowledge.
10Receive my instruction, and not silver; and knowledge rather than choice gold.
11For wisdom is better than rubies; and all the things that may be desired are not to be compared to it.
12I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions.
13The fear of the LORD is to hate evil: pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate.
14Counsel is mine, and sound wisdom: I am understanding; I have strength.
15By me kings reign, and princes decree justice.
16By me princes rule, and nobles, even all the judges of the earth.
17I love them that love me; and those that seek me early shall find me.
18Riches and honour are with me; yea, durable riches and righteousness.
19My fruit is better than gold, yea, than fine gold; and my revenue than choice silver.
20I lead in the way of righteousness, in the midst of the paths of judgment:
21That I may cause those that love me to inherit substance; and I will fill their treasures.
1935 AD — Council of Sremsky-Karlovtsy,
convened and presided over by Metropolitan Anastasius, and attended by several bishops,
condemns the heretical Sophism or Sophiology preached in the Parisian school by Archimandrite Sergius Bulgakov (the belief that Sophia—God’s Wisdom—is a feminine personality,
the soul of the world,
thereby adding a fourth hypostasis to the Holy Trinity,
replacing God the Father with a “mother-goddess” and other false doctrines based on Plato’s pagan philosophy,
cabbalistic teachings,
and heretical Valentinian Gnosticism,
which had been condemned by the early Church).
This council declares the Parisians (under the Ecumenical Patriarchate) to be bereft of grace.
Originally posted by acmpnsfal
reply to post by acrux
We can get caught up in semantics all night....you know exactly what I mean.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
This is the question, why would this orthodox version of Christianity move to keep this information hidden from their church?
Simply because it was a different religion, not Christianity as taught by Christ, and as witnessed by folks such as John. It was Greek Mysticism, not Christianity!
Originally posted by badmedia
Pre-roman christian is referring to the time period before the Romans took it up, and then proceeded to kill anyone who didn't go along with their version.
Jesus was a gnostic.
If Jesus was a Gnostic, then John would have supported Gnosticism, and so would have the folks he trained such as Polycarp. Polycarp and St. Irenaeus lived before Constintine I, and before the Great Schism, so they existed before the Roman Church that you accuse of covering up the Gnosticism in Christianity. Translation... Gnosticism is not what Christ taught...
Originally posted by helen670
reply to post by defcon5
Hi defcon/
Indeed GNOSTICISM was not taught by ANY of Jesus Christ's Apostles or Deciples!
Again THESE people are PURPOSELY deforming the WORD of God.