It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Merigold
Even a criminal has rights.
He doesn't have a right to mingle with others who have also declared war against the USA and he doesnt' have a right to correspond with others who still are on jihad against us. that's common sense.
It's a WAR afterall. Even if Obama doesnt' want to use the term. That's exactly what it is. (Kinda makes you wonder why he won't use the term and why he's so soft on anti-American terrorists.)
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
A war is when two countries are fighting against each other.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
A war is when two countries are fighting against each other.
You are behind the times. Welcome to 2009. Radical Islam declared war against the USA. They declared it against our country. America is at war with radical Islam. That's just the way it is.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
No, sorry. lol.
The only war I saw was an unjust one when we bombed Iraq to hell
and slaughtered over 500,000 Iraqis...in fact, the body count is a million now, isn't it?
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Merigold
Even a criminal has rights.
He doesn't have a right to mingle with others who have also declared war against the USA and he doesnt' have a right to correspond with others who still are on jihad against us. that's common sense.
It's a WAR afterall. Even if Obama doesnt' want to use the term. That's exactly what it is. (Kinda makes you wonder why he won't use the term and why he's so soft on anti-American terrorists.)
Originally posted by KSPigpen
What happens to a prisoner that is hated by many when he is allowed to commingle with other prisoners? He's shanked.
Originally posted by JohnnyElohim
one can hardly be at war with an ideology.
Originally posted by JohnnyElohim
so if he's truly well-connected (doubt that)
and chooses to correspond with organized terrorists (bad idea),
Terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy.
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
Someone take this. This is just too much for me
You mention Saddam broke some agreements.
Did you forget the bombs we dropped down on his country throughout the 90s?
Originally posted by Miraj
You state Sadam's actions as wrong. But who the hell gave the US. the right to go, bomb, shoot, and invade anyone who they see's as the bully.
Attorney General Eric Holder is involved. Gee. No surprise there. Holder wants these terrorists who are waging war against America put into civilian prison
Holder of Clintons pardon-gate - got Marc Rich off.
Holder of 'help the FALN' fame.
Holder of getting Rosenberg and Evans, of the WEATHER UNDERGROUND off fame.
Holder of Telecom Global Crossing fame.
Holder with his extensive ties to Blago. (gotta' love that Chicago politics!)
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Miraj
You state Sadam's actions as wrong. But who the hell gave the US. the right to go, bomb, shoot, and invade anyone who they see's as the bully.
*sigh* Read and learn, young grasshopper.
AGAIN -
- Saddam started Gulf War I.
- Saddam lost Gulf War I.
- Saddam agreed to UN cease fire resolutions.
- Saddam continually broke those UN cease fire resolutions.
- Saddam knew that by breaking them he was subject to force coming in.
The UN and Saddam himself are 'who the hell' gave us the right to enforce the UN ceasefire resolutions. And we didn't just go 'invade anyone'. We enforced resolutions against Iraq that Saddam himself agreed to after he lost the war against Kuwait that he started.
OY ... the blame america first crowd ...
Originally posted by Miraj
reply to post by FlyersFan
You state Sadam's actions as wrong. But who the hell gave the US. the right to go, bomb, shoot, and invade anyone who they see's as the bully. Ever think that maybe, jusssst maybe, this wasn't a war about doing the morally correct thing. And maybe, just maybe, the US has something to profit from removing Sadam. But that's just crazy, Americans only risk their lives to do the right thing. Uh huh.