GOES-14 first image, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 41 times
Topic started on 30-7-2009 @ 08:28 PM by Phage
NOAA's newest Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite, positioned 22,336 miles over the Pacific near South America, has returned its first full disc image. It's impressive.
www.osei.noaa.gov...


reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 08:47 PM by Rhain
Thank you for the posting.

I couldn't agree more..very impressive.



reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 08:58 PM by gemineye
reply to post by Phage



Very nice! May use this is my wallpaper.

Thanks for posting!


reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 09:16 PM by ziggystar60
Wow, that image is FANTASTIC!

And the website is pretty amazing too, with its "Daily Significant Event Imagery" (among lots of other features):
www.osei.noaa.gov...

Under "Current event" you can also find satelite images of the moving shadow on Earth during the latest solar eclipse, like in this gif:
www.osei.noaa.gov...

Thanks for finding and sharing this!


reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 09:25 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by sm0k3



...anyone else notice the chem trails in the clouds west of california? I dont see them elsewhere...


***face/palm***

Second poster, already. AND, to think the second I saw the picture I thought, "Oh good, we can put the "chemtrail" nonsense to rest, finally!"

Boy, what was I thinking???

Ship Trails



[edit on 30 July 2009 by weedwhacker]


reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 12:18 AM by Phage
reply to post by breakingdradles


The disk of Earth is 8,000 miles across. The ISS orbits about 200 miles above the surface of the Earth. That is 1/40th the width of the disc.

If the ISS were directly below the GEOS satellite it would still be 23,000 miles away from it. The ISS is the largest thing in orbit around the Earth. It is about 100 yards across. See those islands in the Sea of Cortez off Baja? Those islands are about 20 miles long. So the ISS, or any other satellite, would be very very very difficult to see.

[edit on 7/31/2009 by Phage]


reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 10:42 AM by Helmkat
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by breakingdradles


The disk of Earth is 8,000 miles across. The ISS orbits about 200 miles above the surface of the Earth. That is 1/40th the width of the disc.

If the ISS were directly below the GEOS satellite it would still be 23,000 miles away from it. The ISS is the largest thing in orbit around the Earth. It is about 100 yards across. See those islands in the Sea of Cortez off Baja? Those islands are about 20 miles long. So the ISS, or any other satellite, would be very very very difficult to see.

[edit on 7/31/2009 by Phage]


Interesting.

Not sure if I am going to use the right words here.

So if the resolution of the camera were good enough it might be possible to find smaller objects in the field of view if you knew where to look? it would be cool to have an overlay that showed the location of some of the objects in orbit that are in this pic but to small to see...


reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 10:58 AM by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by epete22
someone please tell me why its in grey scale. I am sick of these grey scale images of mars, moon and now the earth.

Why strip the color out of these images?

I don't know about the GEOS images, but for the Mars images they do not "strip" the color from them -- the raw pictures from Mars are all in greyscale. The colors are added later after the image is received here on Earth.

The Mars rover digital camera (and all digital cameras -- including yours) are basically "colorblind". The camera cannot distinguish colors they way we distinguish colors. Instead each image is captured through a series of filters that produces greyscale images. Different colors seen through different filters produce different intensities of "grey". The camera's computer then assigns a color to these intensities of "grey", thus creating an "approximate true color" image.

Your camera does all this before showing you the "color" image. However, the imaging scientists who are working with the Mars images would rather receive the raw greyscale pictures because more science can be done with these series of pictures viewed through different filters (and thus separated into different wavelengths of light). These raw, separated wavelength greyscale images are valuable to the scientists.

So, each approximate true color image you see of Mars is actually created by using a series of greyscale images take through the different filters, and then a computer translates the grayscales into approximate colors.


[edit on 7/31/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 11 days ago with 176 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 18 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 7 days ago with 135 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 11 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 9 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 19 days ago with 73 member flags