Ghostly cell phone image creates buzz, page 4

reply to post by bl4ke360

---

Just to put my spin on it i noticed in the upper middle portion of the enlarged
photo a barely perceptible ovaloid lens flare that covers BOTH the little girl
AND the face behind it. If the photo is fake, then someone actually
took the time to put in a non-standard subtle lens flare effect that is NOT
present in even the latest versions of Photoshop, or Boris Effects
or that $15,000 LensFX module used in Discreet's Flame compositing engine.

Another poster had said about the woman in a mirror which I suspect
is the correct thing...I also half-believe that we are in fact seeing the
actual Photographer reflected off of a portion of a simple wall-vanity
mirror that was probably forgotten about by the original photo submitter.

The one that that gets me though is the AGE of the person in the background
AND the extreme similarity in basic looks to the little girl but much more aged
appearance of that background person. Can we say....Time Slip anyone?

I have an unusal question for the photographer and little girl
in that I wish to know if they remember a sudden drop in temperature
within the room where the photo was taken at that time...it's an important
thing for me to know.......I have no other questions ;-) :-)

reply to post by MarrsAttax

---

It looks like a fake to me. It's too clear, and look at the expression. There is none. It looks like a mask to me, perhaps propped up bend the little girl.

Other wise creeped me out for a second, then I realized it.

Originally posted by BigfootNZ
Kinda reminds me of this famous photo.

While not the same field (ie UFO's rather than ghosts) its still rather interesting their similarity.

I dont know people are saying its to good or the person doesn't look like a ghost (as if thats supposed to carry any weight since who among us know what a ghost really looks like, and how could we prove it anyhow).

I guess you can only take the photos takers word for it, give it time and im sure that if its a fake the identity and their connection to the photographer will come to light, on the other hand who knows perhaps a long gone relative was catching up and unfortunately got 'caught'

Me im for fake "hey gran get in behind!" but i aint tossing aside the possibility its not a long departed individual.

ShiftTrio's closing paragraph above this post summed it up perfectly in my mind.

Edit:- Hmm anyone else think their related, the old womans got a face with very similar features to the kid in front of her, definitely say they are related... maybe their one in the same ... i kid, or do I?


[edit on 30-7-2009 by BigfootNZ]

MY TAKE:
===========
Regarding this photo...I am going on PURE SPECULATION HERE that
IF the photo is a true and accurate representation of the events
told, I THINK i can explain why the CAMERA saw the astronaut/alien
but the human eye did not....It has recently come to my attention that
certain new (hmm...make that OLD!) types of materials can be manufactured
to BEND or REDIRECT optical frequencies around or away
from a 3D object.

These substances, called metamaterials, are 3D stacked nano-objects
that can act as waveguides at optical and microwave freqencies
which in laymans terms, can make things INVISIBLE to both the
human eye and radar.

I going to go out on a limb here and suggest that IF the photo is real,
then the astronaut/alien was wearing a suit that was invisible to
the 400nm to 700nm wavelengths of the human eye that has the
unique property of having a problem with excessive Persistence of Vision
or in other words, the eye's shutter speed is pretty slow which would
allow a being cloaked in a metamaterial-based suit to use the 3D
nano-scale optical waveguides embedded on the suit's surface to
redirect light around or away from the suit at a specific frequency
that is compatible with human vision but still visible to fast shutter-speed
film that goes beyond capturing the limited human-scale 400 to 700 nm
visible light into the near infra-red and low ultra violet which many films
in that era of 1950-1970 would be perfectly capable of. The human eye
woudn'y see anything because the optical waveguides would overload the
human vision system with re-directed light but a FILM CAMERA,
having a fast shutter speed and wider range of chrominance & luminance
absorption ability WOULD show up the suit in a final silver-halide print!

This is speculation on my part but do peruse the websites below
or search on the web using search terms such as 3D Metamaterials,
Visual Stealth Using Metamaterials, Optical Stealth, Microwave Stealth,
and Nano-scale Optical Waveguides.

See:

www.physorg.com...

and

nextbigfuture.com...

and

en.wikipedia.org...

Comments anyone?

reply to post by bery300

---

another cellphone picture nice might be something to this but ive had enough of this cellphone stuff did you know that if you text message you can still drive a commuter train in boston a women in houston who was such a good customer was rewarded with extra roll over minutes when she drove her suv into a bayou while talking on her phone she survived but gave her 4 children dirt naps because she never took them to swimming lessons did you know that if take your kids to day care in your suv for 10 yrs and you talk on you cellphone while your dropping them off they dont really like it humm saw 2 little girls in the dfw airport terminal one 7ish shes happy does a cartwheel im thinkin its nice to this happiness displayed but then her baby sister 5ish is thinkin the me too thing and she does one as well im thinkin this is nice to see then her cellphone drops out from somewhere kids dont even have time to be kids with these things come on mom and dad set an example if you cant then stop breeding im nobody special im aircraft mechanic im working on airplane systems and the flight crew comes out asks a bunch of questions and sits on the plane while im working and turns that baby into virtual phone booth you couldnt dynomite them out of there until there done with theyre 27 cellphone calls some times i just get these uncontrollable twitches and i dont know where they come from!

reply to post by drock905

---

I'm not doubting you, but I've gone through a bunch of keyword searches on Google and cannot find an earlier version of this pic. Are you sure it's the same pic?

reply to post by tallcool1

---

Double Exposure... Now why would double exposure age the 2nd image???? Some new type of crazy time channel DE??????

North Carolina\'s strange, strange pond.
  Posted 2 days ago with 46 member flags

Saw my first possesion.....:O
  Posted 16 days ago with 18 member flags

The Nevada Triangle: Have You Experienced It?
  Posted 14 days ago with 18 member flags

Empaths and thier "powers" fiction or reality?
  Posted 12 days ago with 13 member flags

Ghosts At Boot Camp! Do You Have a Story?
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags

Do extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof?
  Posted 7 days ago with 10 member flags

I was invited to be a tech on a ghost hunting team. Any suggestions, comments?
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags

Help... I want to convince my wife that mediums are con artists
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: