Originally posted by tezzajw
Originally posted by jthomas
Feel free to demonstrate that AA77 was not identified, nor its parts
Go ahead, make my day.
jthomas, the burden of proof is upon the people who believe that Flight AA77 hit the Pentagon.
Sorry that evasion doesn't work. You have to
refute ALL the evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon.
You haven't and your refuse to. You have had almost 8 years and you have never refuted ANY of the evidence.
Originally posted by jthomas
Another epic fail from a 9/11 Denier.
Sorry, Bubba, the burden of proof is entirely on your shoulders. You can't even give us a source for your claims.
Another epic fail from a government story believer.
It is clear, as I pointed out in the OP, that jthomas has murdered Logic 101.
The burden of proof, to identify the alleged parts and wreckage, belongs to those people who make that claim that they came from Flight
AA77.
9/11 Deniers like you don't have a clue what logic is.
Let's try again:
You have PLENTY of sources who had direct access to the wreckage both inside and outside the Pentagon, over 1,000 people.
When asked to present their statements,
you 9/11 Deniers have REFUSED. Ever since CIT was asked to present their statements they have simply
refused and every 9/11 Denier since then has refused.
Now you're trying
again to desperately to evade your responsibility to deal with
ALL of the evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon.
If you don't believe it did, then
DEMONSTRATE by REFUTING the existing evidence. It's your claim, its your responsibility. None of us have to
do anything except wait for you to perform. And when confronted with your responsibility to perform, you whine incessantly that the rest of the world
has to do your homework for you.
Way back when Darwin proposed his theory of natural selection, it was his burden of proof to demonstrate it. In the interim 150 years later the
evidence for natural selection from multiple lines of evidence was accepted by scientists and the burden of proof shifted to evolutions detractors.
Now we have religious fundamentalists and Creationists trying to cast doubt on evolutionary biology by
making claims that are not demonstrated
and misrepresent facts in order to "cast doubt" on evolution.
9/11 Deniers are like Creationists. It's the nature of Denial.
We'll continue to hold your feet to the fire, tezzajw, and remind you of your evasions of responsibility.
