New World Order Being Taught In Schools! video, page 1

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 61 times

Topic started on 30-7-2009 @ 01:21 AM by LeeannaHolland

YouTube Link

Listen to what this kid has to say about the NWO, his textbook, and how the subject is treated at school.

I don't know what ATSers will think of this, not sure if already posted.

This kid is sure brave, whatever is going on.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 01:39 AM by eMachine

I think I saw that a few months ago. Thanks for posting it here, I think more people should see it.

Re-education facilities of the regime. At least that's the way I think of schools. It was the same when I was in school years ago, and decades before that even.

What can we expect from educational institutions set up and funded by the establishment, but for them to teach people what the establishment wants?

My kids will not be going to their schools. TJ Ed for the win.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 01:40 AM by TheAssociate

Good find

The public school system is indeed an indoctrination device. It was when I was there, and I'm sure it's even more so now.

The interesting part is the mention of the NWO in the textbook. This is a communist-style indoctrination technique. Teach the kids that the regime (in this case, the forthcoming one-world government) is great and that anyone who questions it is a 'terrorist' (the communists used the term 'counterrevolutionary') and soon enough you've got an entire generation of soldiers for your regime.

TA

[edit on 30-7-2009 by TheAssociate]

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 01:47 AM by Evasius

We need more kids like this - he's awake to what's going on. There's no telling how many schools have similar rules and promote this type of mental conditioning. It would be interesting to know what company publishes that book and then obtain a title & distribution list. I hope he keeps at it. If only I were that 'awake' at that age - I think I first caught on to this NWO stuff around the age of 27. Hopefully more kids will catch on as well.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 01:51 AM by JalZhaunlUss

I remember this in history class. Only 4 people in my class knew about the real situation with things. Funny thing was that i always was able to prove my side of the arguments right because i would research material and bring it in with me on the day that it was needed. That's how i got an A throughout highschool in that class...proving my points.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 02:02 AM by schrodingers dog

Argh ...

Come on folks ... no one likes a good conspiracy more than I do but are we really going to once more purposely confuse terminology to make a dubious point and re-enforce our beliefs upon a false premise?

New World Order in his textbook:

In international relations theory, the term "new world order" has been used to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power. Despite various interpretations of this term, it is primarily associated with the notion of global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual states to solve.

New World Order as you mean it:

In conspiracy theory, the term "New World Order" (the capital letters are distinguishing) refers to the advent of a cryptocratic or totalitarian one world government.

Please don't use NWO as a misnamed "catch all" conspiracy of the gaps notion. It dilutes the value of the intended meaning.

Now ... having said all that, kudos to the kid for his inquisitiveness and intelligence, he would make an awesome ATS member.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 02:12 AM by eMachine

reply to post by schrodingers dog

Good points, Sdog. My perspective still is: They are teaching those kids what to think about political issues, rather than how to make sense of politics, reason for themselves, and come to their own conclusions.

I will not trust my kids' minds to a bunch of textbook writers and teachers who were probably all the people I disliked when I was going to school with them...

My kids are still not going.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 02:25 AM by cloakndagger

That kid knows more at his age then I knew for over 20 years. They are waking up young aren't they? There is a reason why education is socialized. In Europe their schools are not socialized, only their health care is. You get to choose what school you want to go to and those who do bad do not get the money. It's like shopping for education over there. Schools compete for those dollars.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 02:37 AM by l_e_cox

reply to post by LeeannaHolland

I think this topic is important.

Since the concept of a "world government" has been publicly voiced, it has been sugar-coated and presented as very desirable. The concept and several of its corollaries have been pushed in schools for some time now. The breakthrough in schools came when psychology took over the training of teachers. There has been a persistent backlash against the "new" methods and the overt and covert messages that go with them. Some accuse the schools of destroying the intelligence, initiative, judgment, morals, and competence of our youth. Some think that is exactly what they were intended to do. What do the statistics say? I haven't looked at them recently, but last time I did conventional public schools were not doing too well. Many people think that conventional schooling is just part of the "plan."

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 02:47 AM by LeeannaHolland

This kid has been either "talked to" by someone.... Or he himself has been able to connect the dots. For all we know, he may be a member at ATS.

Maybe he should be a member at ATS. I care about what he has to say.

Thanks everyone, for watching the vid and commenting.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 02:57 AM by alienesque

Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Argh ...

Come on folks ... no one likes a good conspiracy more than I do but are we really going to once more purposely confuse terminology to make a dubious point and re-enforce our beliefs upon a false premise?

New World Order in his textbook:

In international relations theory, the term "new world order" has been used to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power. Despite various interpretations of this term, it is primarily associated with the notion of global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual states to solve.

New World Order as you mean it:

In conspiracy theory, the term "New World Order" (the capital letters are distinguishing) refers to the advent of a cryptocratic or totalitarian one world government.

Please don't use NWO as a misnamed "catch all" conspiracy of the gaps notion. It dilutes the value of the intended meaning.

Now ... having said all that, kudos to the kid for his inquisitiveness and intelligence, he would make an awesome ATS member.

hello

this is exactly the problem...

'new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual states to solve.'

how will this be done without global governance?..you yourself say that the problems are not solvable by the individual states.

i hear this argument very often and i honestly cant understand why people cant see the link...a world government doesnt automatically mean that individual countries wont exist...it simply means a global authority that has power over important areas of our day to day life...as in the EU..their power is growing every day...not many people have any insight and most people dont understand how they can influence any of the EUs decisions....this is intentional.

in a perfect world id welcome a world government....but i dont trust humans enough to accept and allow a small group of people gaining such positions of power.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 03:11 AM by jinx880101

Great post, flagged and starred.

That kid really has balls! They must think kids are completely stupid. First, they say the NWO is a conspiracy, then all of a sudden it's being taught in text books? How do their heads work?

Anys, thanks will pass it on.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 03:15 AM by Janitor From Mars

reply to post by cloakndagger

I believe that public schools can be reformed but it's up to the community to work together to demand accountability within these schools, instead of giving up and sending their kids to private schools (which from my experience, are no better).

Homeschooling is a much more plausible idea and I'm more willing to support it now.

I lucked out on a quality public school education that trumped my experience at a private school. Without that education I would probably not even be able to speak well, read or do basic math.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 03:35 AM by Faiol

Originally posted by schrodingers dog
Argh ...

Come on folks ... no one likes a good conspiracy more than I do but are we really going to once more purposely confuse terminology to make a dubious point and re-enforce our beliefs upon a false premise?

New World Order in his textbook:

In international relations theory, the term "new world order" has been used to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power. Despite various interpretations of this term, it is primarily associated with the notion of global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual states to solve.

New World Order as you mean it:

In conspiracy theory, the term "New World Order" (the capital letters are distinguishing) refers to the advent of a cryptocratic or totalitarian one world government.

Please don't use NWO as a misnamed "catch all" conspiracy of the gaps notion. It dilutes the value of the intended meaning.

Now ... having said all that, kudos to the kid for his inquisitiveness and intelligence, he would make an awesome ATS member.

Ys ... I think the kid was confused because of the same term .... good post!

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 03:57 AM by Odessy

reply to post by LeeannaHolland

I want my kid to be just like this kid.

2nd line.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 05:20 AM by Rybo666

reply to post by alienesque

Absolutly right!! It will be a dark day for us when a single world government comes into power. Unfortunately it's inevitable. The thing is i can see leaders such as Kim jong il (or wotever his name is) and other powerful dictators taking a stand against this due to the fact that they (eventually) will not be in control. It's gonna be messed up and it saddens me to think that this will happen.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 06:05 AM by Perseus Apex

LOL young folk waking up n stuff.

It will ultimately be up to generation Z, the last in the alphabet and for good reason.

When you run out of firewood, don't forget the history books; they should be next. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust...the rest is history.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 06:28 AM by CapsFan8

reply to post by schrodingers dog

I sort of agree, that in this case the kid's points aren't all that compelling, compared to others that could be attacked. But the premise is still valid.

The wording in that definition seems innocent enough. But look at the wording "Despite various interpretations of this term". It's another way of saying, don't listen to these ideas, they are dangerous and off-limits to you. Let us do the thinking and write the history books and interpret your reality for you. It's all part of the original goal of public education, to condition you for obedience in order to be a good worker bee for the corporate world.

I thought the camera thing was a better point. While it is a somewhat more legitimate excuse to ban phones because of the distraction in class, it is more suspicious that they specifically say no camera phones, as if they are trying to hide something.

I am only 21. I could see the radical and disturbing changes occurring in the schools at the time. The increase in rigidity, the dumbing down of material, the patronizing practices. They continue trend toward training you to get used to social control and a generally thoughtless existence.

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 06:44 AM by ignorant_ape

the ban on camera phones is effectivly a ban on phones - who has a phone without a camera in 2009 ?

its 8 years since i had a ` plain ` phone - and i do not slavishly follow phone fashion / upgrades

the market may be different in the states - but here [ UK ] i cannot find a none camera phone on sale new

the bloke at the market has some second hand ones - but thats it

reply posted on 30-7-2009 @ 06:52 AM by NoJoker13

Umm it's an alright video with how it obscures the view but honesty this is no different then any high school for the past 20 years... if not more. I remember reading the same things in my text books, I also remember all types of clothing being banned, hoods etc. along with any type or photographic device because 1 it disrupts class and 2 some closing can conceal your identity. I live in New Bedford MA, and we've had kids threaten to kill students a number of times so tons of percautions had to be made.

Also a question to the OP, why do you need a crell phone in school, when they aren't even allowed at my job???

I think this is just some BS propaganda machine, schools always inforce rules to police their students thats the way it goes. Even more so today though... thank Columbine.

[edit on 30-7-2009 by NoJoker13]

Pages: << 1 2 3 4 >> ^^TOP^^