It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flashes in WTC-6 and WTC-7.

page: 1
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:06 PM
link   
We all have seen "flashes" in the WTC buildings. There have been various explanations that have been put forward. I wan't to concentrate on some other buildings for a moment. (comparison of flashes from the other buildings would be fine for the purposes of this discussion if you want to include those.)


I want to start with a bit of testimony.
LINK



PO: I just kept running. I was aware there were other people running as well. After passing the cars on fire, I was trying to find someplace safe. I tried to run into the lobby of 6 World Trade, but there were federal police -- maybe 4 to 6 of them -- standing in the open doorways. As I tried to run in, they wouldn't let me, waving me out, telling me "you can't come in here, keep running." As I turned to start running west again, I saw a series of flashes around the ceiling of the lobby all going off one-by-one like the X-mass lights that "chase" in pattern. I think I started running faster at that point.


I realize this is Killtown's blog(controversial figure), but it has an important interview with Patricia Ondrovic. The interview concerns "flashes in bldg-6." It also includes talk about cars exploding etc.


The lady mentioned above also has done an interview with the Fire Dept:
Interview


Now I want to turn our attention to some video evidence:


WTC-6
Look early on, you will see a quick flash...


WTC-7
9-10 seconds in, you should see a flash in WTC-7


2nd Flash WTC-7
Clearly there is a flash here. The video will show a repeat and close up so as to make it easier to see. I can't verify if the video has been tampered with, so if anyone can please do. Its part of the Bob and Bri collection.

Comparison of Flashes in Other Buildings.

Apologies in advance for failing to embed videos.




posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:23 PM
link   
You said we have all seen "flashes" in the WTC buildings. I have looked for these flashes. I have never seen them. Do you have a link to these "flashes" as you so eloquently put in brackets?

Your links failed to show "flashes" which are consistent with controlled demolition.

[edit on 29-7-2009 by Jim Parker]



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:32 PM
link   
Watch and learn my friend. Don't be fooled by the deviousness of the 911 truth movement.

www.youtube.com...



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jim Parker
Watch and learn my friend. Don't be fooled by the deviousness of the 911 truth movement.

www.youtube.com...


www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

The above, you can clearly see "white flashes" that resemble "white" flashes in controlled demolitions.

In one instance, the flash happens and smoke comes out of the area.

Now just to quickly mention something here:

Do I think it was a conventional demolition? No. Obvioulsy it wasn't, but it probalby did have some conventional explosives used. Regarding controlled demolitions that we are used to seeing, there is some "noise." However, given the sound around the Towers and the reported explosions by emergency workers, it would be very difficult to distinguish what was what. So the "lack of sound" of such, is really not an argument, as I don't think this was conventional and there was the sound of explosions but we can't prove what those sounds were. But given these flashes on WTC-6 and 7 as well as the Towers looking very similar, to me is very suspicious.

[edit on 29-7-2009 by talisman]

[edit on 29-7-2009 by talisman]



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:45 PM
link   
reply to post by talisman
 


What in the World was that nonsense??

Are you implying the building was imploded above the planes impact?? I think your links were quite devious. Shame on you!!!



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:48 PM
link   
reply to post by talisman
 


Have you ever wondered why not 1 single demolition expert agrees with you, including those experts in Countries such as Iraq and Iran?

Maybe you should take a step back and seriously think about that.



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:50 PM
link   
reply to post by talisman
 


Are you saying WTC6 was blown up??? WTC6??????? Is this a joke?? Snip



[Mod Edit - insults]

Civility and Decorum are Required

[edit on 29/7/2009 by Sauron]



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jim Parker
reply to post by talisman
 


Have you ever wondered why not 1 single demolition expert agrees with you, including those experts in Countries such as Iraq and Iran?

Maybe you should take a step back and seriously think about that.


You don't know that. In order for you to know such a thing, you would have to know all the demolition experts in the world. Perhaps, we don't know of such who have "gone public." That is a far different notion.

We know there were "numerous secondary explosions." There obviously was the "sound" of such. Now we see these flashes, not only in "6" but in "7" and of course ~~ WTC-1&2.


[edit on 29-7-2009 by talisman]



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:57 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by talisman
 



OK. Name 1 expert on the entire planet who sees what you see, snip who is, more than likely unemployed, or a low income nobody.




[mod Edit removed insult]

Civility and Decorum are Required

[edit on 29/7/2009 by Sauron]



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 11:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jim Parker
reply to post by talisman
 



OK. Name 1 expert on the entire planet who sees what you see, you a snip who is, more than likely unemployed, or a low income nobody.


I made a distinction between people going public and everyone disagreeing it was a controlled demolition. Just becasue no-one has gone public, does not mean that there are not those who believe such.

*I'm done with you. Anyone else who can't give respect will not earn it from me. If you can't argue your points without name calling, travel somewhere else.



[Mod Edit - quote]

[edit on 29/7/2009 by Sauron]



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 11:09 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 11:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jim Parker
You said we have all seen "flashes" in the WTC buildings. I have looked for these flashes. I have never seen them. Do you have a link to these "flashes" as you so eloquently put in brackets?

Your links failed to show "flashes" which are consistent with controlled demolition.

[edit on 29-7-2009 by Jim Parker]


I saw them live on 911 and you can see them on the videos on the news archives in this forum.



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 11:24 PM
link   
reply to post by talisman
 


WTC 6 was the Custom's building right?
WTC 7 full function is still unknown to me.
But most likely there was some alphabet agencies offices there.

7 Fell on 01.09.11
6 Didn't until later.

So, WTC 6 was later demolished on in cleanup efforts at 'ground zero'
From what is known, and unknown... #7 could have possibly been a critical asset at the time. #6 also, being the US customs building?

I cannot speculate what would be in a building such as six, and I'm not here to do the debunking with regards to the OP by any means. Could it have been that WTC 6 had some critical data on the (official story) hijackers? What does customs deal with?



Cheers,
T minus



posted on Jul, 29 2009 @ 11:45 PM
link   
There is no doubt in most peoples minds that 9/11 was planned within and outside of the u.s...... by who? The question.


Upon researching 911, it was easy to see that there was an obvious coverup and pathetic investigation. The paper trail leads to some interesting people and bin laden is not one of them.

Asfar as the flashes. There is no doubt that it was not the planes and the fire that brought down those buildings on 911.

Is it possible that for saftey measures there were controlled explosives that were maintained monthly just in case there was a major fire or a plane crash that they can atleast control their collapse saving many other buildings and life?





[edit on 29-7-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]



posted on Jul, 30 2009 @ 12:07 AM
link   
911 is such a joke..... so many "coincidences" so much video evidence and WTC7 to me is clearly the smoking gun........ anyone who still abides by the official story is extremely questionable



posted on Jul, 30 2009 @ 12:40 AM
link   
reply to post by Jim Parker
 



Watch and learn my friend. Don't be fooled by the deviousness of the 911 truth movement.

www.youtube.com...


Apples and oranges again. Clearly, the recordings of the commercial demolitions were made to enhance the sounds of the explosions. They were also made outside. In the case of the WTC towers shown in the video, we have a very different situation. It is perfectly clear that the recording was made using a very high power zoom camera, inside a building some blocks away from WTC,(as evidenced by the “zoom”). The room was also very well insulated from outside noise, in fact, it was so well insulated that you can hear the TV audio in the background.

Let’s start at 4:52 into the video, and listen to the background noise. No large crowd of people, no sirens, no NYPD or NYFD radio noise, only the sound emanating from a television set in that room. At 5:06 in the video you will hear a “pop” and then the sound of people screaming is faded in. All the while, you can still hear the TV playing in the background.


BUSTED!

Pure disinfo


[edit on 30-7-2009 by impressme]



posted on Jul, 30 2009 @ 01:23 AM
link   
I believe the argument about the lack of "noise" concerning the "demolition" is poor, due to the fact so many emergency staff did indeed hear explosions. Some helicopter pilots heard successive explosions one after another. So there was the noise, whether we heard it or not.

Now the interesting thing in all of this is flashes in Building 6. Could it be that there were more buildings that were supposed to be "dropped" yet some failed? It could be that they planend to have numerous buildings go down so as to make it look less suspicious or at least less suspicious in their(the people behind this) minds...


[edit on 30-7-2009 by talisman]



posted on Jul, 30 2009 @ 01:36 AM
link   
Talisman, these are great videos!

One thing I'd like to suggest is that the flash from WTC 6 may have
been from the lower level of Twin Tower as it appears to occur "through
the glass" so to speak.

The flash in WTC 7 IF AUTHENTIC should totally shut everyone up because
the Twin Towers have not yet fallen and therefore could not have started any fires in #7!



posted on Jul, 30 2009 @ 01:55 AM
link   
Just to add something strange. I found this by accident:
www.youtube.com...

Two "window washers" going up WTC-7. The above clip is short. There are other clips that I have seen, can't find them now, that show them there for a long time going up the building.

Doesn't that seem odd?
It was on that side there were some possible flashes going off.

This is of course also interesting since the CIA won't comment on their records there:
www.911blogger.com...



EDIT: Here is another Clip of those "window washers."

www.youtube.com...


[edit on 30-7-2009 by talisman]



new topics

top topics



 
5
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join