Homosexuality Should Be Banned -

page: 3
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 11:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by ELECTRICkoolaidZOMBIEtest
ive never met a gay christian.

if i did i would probably take dozens of pictures. and hopefully an interview on video. they are more of a mystery to me than bigfoot.


Funny. I had several as roommates for years. According to them most of their church was gay and half of them were registered as repulicans.

I'm guessing you need to get out more.




posted on Dec, 5 2009 @ 12:02 PM
link   
easier to just throw in the "age rasism card" and bann partnership all to gether untill you reach an age of lets say 40, after that you may apply for a mating licens which opts you the possibility for making children with a pre determide set of geneticly potential mates, the child is then put in a fosterfamily with a parenting license and parents never parent their own children (0-21) after theyve reached adult hood biological parent contact is premitted.

mating / parenting needs a big reform be it what sexuality in order to work with the family being gone from the norm of society



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 07:51 AM
link   
reply to post by defcon5
 
Not just the "Christians" all religious fanatics thoughout our bloody history: all in the name of humanity's many "gods"

Want statistics - Okay with source




www.godandscience.org...

I absolutely agree with atheists and others who say that many atrocious things have been done in the name of God, and even in the name of Christianity. However, these atrocities were not perpetrated by God, but by evil human beings. If we look at the history of democide (which includes genocide, politicide, and mass murder, but not war-dead) prior to the 20th century, we find that millions of people were killed by people groups who wanted the other people groups eliminated. Note that these numbers do not include those killed through wars.

Cases Years2 Democide3 Religious?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

China 221 B.C.-19 C. 33,519,0004 No
Mongols 14 C-15 C 29,927,000 No
Slavery of Africans 1451-1870 17,267,000 No
Amer-Indians 16 C-19 C 13,778,000 No
Thirty Years War 1618-1648 5,750,000 No
In India 13 C-1 9 C 4,511,0005 No
In Iran 5 C-19 C 2,000,0004,5 No
Ottoman Empire 12 C-19 C 2,000,0005 No
In Japan 1570-19 C 1,500,0005 No
In Russia 10 C-19 C 1,007,0005 No
Christian Crusades 1095-1272 1,000,000 Yes
Aztecs Centuries 1,000,0006 Yes
Spanish Inquisition 16 C-18 C 350,000 Yes
French Revolution 1793-1794 263,000 No
Albigensian Crusade 1208-1249 200,000 Yes
Witch Hunts 15 C-17 C 100,000 Yes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total For All Cases pre-20 C 133,147,000 2,650,000
Hypothetical Total 30 C B.C.-19 C A.D. 625,716,0007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

International war-related dead 30 C B.C.-19 C A.D. 40,457,0008


Live long & prosper.

[edit on 6-12-2009 by ofhumandescent]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 08:03 AM
link   
I think homosexuality is a disorder, an obsession and people should be able to practice it if they wish to. It's just like a fetish, but just because people have a fetish they should not get extra treatment. What if tomorrow there is a group of people that say vomiting is a new way of life,
and they can only have sex by vomiting on eachother and they should be able to vomit in curch while they get married and have special privileges from the state just because they have this habbit.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 08:05 AM
link   
reply to post by thisguyrighthere
 


So the headline you employed serves as bait I guess. Such treachery,

I'm shocked.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 08:16 AM
link   
reply to post by pepsi78
 





and they can only have sex by vomiting on eachother and they should be able to vomit in curch while they get married and have special privileges from the state just because they have this habbit


You mean like this?





[edit on 6-12-2009 by randyvs]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 08:17 AM
link   
If this thread is a perfect description, of what constitutes an intelligent debate, then we - the human race - should poison the world's water supply and start from scratch.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:02 AM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


That was kinky, now they can get special licences for mariage.
..and walk around naked.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 09:51 AM
link   
reply to post by pepsi78
 

Since you seem to share the same "world-view" (how limiting and sad) why don't you get together with Rev Phelps and increase the sect? (See: adultthought.ucsd.edu...)
I hope you know, whether you like it or not, homosexuality is all around you. So watch your back, oh noble warrior! Oh Captain my Captain.
I'm sure your limited ignorance will change the way we all think - Not.
By the way, what about the homoerotic conact soldiers have in movies like "Platoon" or "The Boys from Company C"? Homosexuality can be "romantic" or physical - do you confine homosexuality to physical acts like oral or anal sex? Yet, same-sex "brotherhood" is defined differently?
Wouldn't you say a same-sex environment like the military is at least "homo-erotic"?
From what I understand a true heterosexist such as yourself should only have contact with the opposite sex.

[edit on 6-12-2009 by halfoldman]

[edit on 6-12-2009 by halfoldman]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by pepsi78
I think homosexuality is a disorder, an obsession and people should be able to practice it if they wish to. It's just like a fetish, but just because people have a fetish they should not get extra treatment. What if tomorrow there is a group of people that say vomiting is a new way of life,
and they can only have sex by vomiting on eachother and they should be able to vomit in curch while they get married and have special privileges from the state just because they have this habbit.

You are half right. Many sexuality choices are choices. But there are 8 different sexes, who's to say which sex partner they should choose.
Babies born with 2 penises, 2 vaginas, both sexes, no sex organs, and some other combos. What choices should they have?

[edit on 6-12-2009 by JJay55]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 10:14 AM
link   


You are half right. Many sexuality choices are choices. But there are 8 different sexes, who's to say which sex partner they should choose.
Babies born with 2 penises, 2 vaginas, both sexes, no sex organs, and some other combos. What choices should they have?

[edit on 6-12-2009 by JJay55]

Well there is surgery for that, I'm sure none would like to be like that where you have two sexes. This is my point, you chose what to be, this is a perfect example, you have a choisse. If people want to be gay let them be gay but they should not expect other people to make privilages for them and treat them with special laws as in "the other people are here"
let's aplly the "other laws" for them, let's give them special licences for mariage, let's let them parade naked around the street, and let them adopt children not because it's right or wrong but because it's a trend and hey it's cool, if your cool then it's okay.

If they want to be gay then I don't think anyone minds them, it's the special treatment and the red carpet people are fearing.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 03:11 PM
link   
reply to post by pepsi78
 

I gather you don't like gay people (although your rant seems to be agaisnt specific "gay" acts).
Could you name some of the laws that upset you?



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 05:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by halfoldman
reply to post by pepsi78
 

I gather you don't like gay people (although your rant seems to be agaisnt specific "gay" acts).
Could you name some of the laws that upset you?


I don't like alot of things but it's not that. Did you see the comercials where it says that becoming gay is cool? and where they say hot chicks
and I swear they look just like girls but there is something else under the underwear and you get disgusted because you thought it was a girl but it's not. It's a perverted version of the already perverted porn industry to make you think it;s okay to like it.

It's something like this ....You don't like it but hey we will make you like it because being gay is cool.

I don't mind if they want to have sex with eachother, I don't see why they should try to involve me or others like me, or to trick people.

It's advertising, promotional, they said it was genetc now it's trendy and if you get sic from it and puke all over they will just say, well you are scum just because you don't aprove of us. I don't have to, just like with myt political view on some things , I don't have to aprove of it all.

Now they want god to say that being gay is cool, what next?
We don't have to aprove of anything and give anyone the red carpet.





[edit on 6-12-2009 by pepsi78]



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 05:38 PM
link   
Extremists are more the problem than the religion itself.
And, as far as that goes, religion is simply a easy place for them to inhabit.
I've met extremists in nearly everything, and they aren't always religious.

In any case, I'm always more than a bit shocked, as I was raised Christian, rather heavily, in fact. We were taught against forming prejudices against people, as well as accepting other religions.
The reasoning was, as the true religion, Christianity should have no fear of the teachings of other religions, and how in fact, there are faiths which compliment Christianity.
This was in CCD at a Catholic Church, oddly enough.

At this point, of course, I realize such practices are in fact a minority.
I've found that people are often surprised at my faith, for much of what I'd consider the wrong reasons.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 05:59 PM
link   
reply to post by RuneSpider
 


We live in a more agresive times where you have to stand up for your self or get smashed by the wave. If people do not protest about things in general those things will soon be implemented and you will have to accept them. How would you like a gay to flrt with you? I would smak the crap out of him, but I would also mind my own business even if I knew he was gay only if he left me alone. But not with today's flavors and trends.
I don't have to accept while walking down the bulevard with my child the gay parade with naked gays rubing against eachother in front of my little kid. It's wrong. For gay people acting normal I do not hold anything against them, it's just that not all gay are normal and alot of them act like this. We all got special desiers, I'm sure if I like tall woman with long legs I don't go outside to pick on everyone of this sort of women on the street.

I don't even care about what sexual prefrences people have, because this should be private but they are making it public and that is when it starts to bother me. It's like ....can't you mind you own freakin business and stop showing me you are gay, I don;t care, and of course as a result to this the gay comunity gets upset because people are not willing to give them the special treatment.

Overall I don't like gay people, not because of their sexual prefrences, but because the way they act in public.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Every single time I see a thread with a title like this, regardless of the OP, the first thought that comes to my head is "Your face should be banned."

Just so you know. Then I take a deep breath and walk away because I find that these arguments tend to go nowhere fast.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 06:02 PM
link   
Actually find this entire thing ludicrous. Up until recently they had articles in the newspaper and I found them online discussing the small and declining number of those attending Christian Churches. Now, no matter how I google I'm getting sites that must be lumping all the ones baptised as children into active faithful christians.

Its propaganda. The leaders who want everyone dumbed down thinking their neighbors are avid Christians in practice and believe the bible is infallible are satanic, lucifieran, babolynian, sumerian, annanuki, psychotic, freaks ( and I'm not even convinced that the luciferean and satanic info is legit as there is no talmud or Jewish equivalent to these things....hmmmm....so perhaps these are just covers for whatever their twisted dino brains reverence, but it certainly isnt the Christian slave religion,nor the Jewish one, nor the Muslim one......

And there are very low attendances happening in the Churches. Most of the people aren't avid Church attenders, and their leaders, even the right winged religious ones, are covering for something far more sinister.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 06:12 PM
link   
reply to post by pepsi78
 


I've been hit on by gay guys. It's a bit embarrassing, but over all I bear it no mind. I've also been hit on by women, which I much prefer.

As for the parades, well, that'll have to be where you draw your scruples.
Honestly, these days sex is in everything, in many ways, it's less prevalent in the States than outside the country.
I wouldn't take my kids to a Madi Gras parade, for example, unless it was clearly indicated it'd be kid friendly.
Even then, I'd be leery of some of the people in the crowd.

However, I'm also well aware that's it's going to be something they need to be prepared for, and be able to react appropriately.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 06:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by pepsi78



You are half right. Many sexuality choices are choices. But there are 8 different sexes, who's to say which sex partner they should choose.
Babies born with 2 penises, 2 vaginas, both sexes, no sex organs, and some other combos. What choices should they have?

[edit on 6-12-2009 by JJay55]

Well there is surgery for that, I'm sure none would like to be like that where you have two sexes. This is my point, you chose what to be, this is a perfect example, you have a choisse. If people want to be gay let them be gay but they should not expect other people to make privilages for them and treat them with special laws as in "the other people are here"
let's aplly the "other laws" for them, let's give them special licences for mariage, let's let them parade naked around the street, and let them adopt children not because it's right or wrong but because it's a trend and hey it's cool, if your cool then it's okay.

If they want to be gay then I don't think anyone minds them, it's the special treatment and the red carpet people are fearing.

Ok, so you think a 6 year old understands that his internal female organs and external male organs make him one sex and he should choose the other? The parents are usually confused about these situations too. And it's more common than you think. 1 in 100000 babies have physical sexual identity problems. It's not a choice.



posted on Dec, 6 2009 @ 06:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by pepsi78
reply to post by RuneSpider
 


We live in a more agresive times where you have to stand up for your self or get smashed by the wave. If people do not protest about things in general those things will soon be implemented and you will have to accept them. How would you like a gay to flrt with you? I would smak the crap out of him, but I would also mind my own business even if I knew he was gay only if he left me alone. But not with today's flavors and trends.
I don't have to accept while walking down the bulevard with my child the gay parade with naked gays rubing against eachother in front of my little kid. It's wrong. For gay people acting normal I do not hold anything against them, it's just that not all gay are normal and alot of them act like this. We all got special desiers, I'm sure if I like tall woman with long legs I don't go outside to pick on everyone of this sort of women on the street.

I don't even care about what sexual prefrences people have, because this should be private but they are making it public and that is when it starts to bother me. It's like ....can't you mind you own freakin business and stop showing me you are gay, I don;t care, and of course as a result to this the gay comunity gets upset because people are not willing to give them the special treatment.

Overall I don't like gay people, not because of their sexual prefrences, but because the way they act in public.



Why do you have to talk about aggression? Sure, according to the above if a gay flirts with you (whatever that entails) you'll physically attack him? Well, I'm gay and I'd love to bring it on and smash your brain in (as The Clash used to sing). But that train of thought is getting us nowhere.
I actually agree with you as a gay man to an extent. I shy away from the "fashionista gay scene" and have very little to do by choice with most gays.
As for the examples of "oppressive" gay culture - I live in South Africa and don't know what irks you. (Perhaps you need a girlfriend?)
If you told me this to my face, we can fight and make the soil bloody. I hate aggro and vilolence, but I ain't scared of your kind no more.





new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join