It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by prepare4it777
reply to post by Taxi-Driver
Ohhhh ok I understand. You mean out of control fires like the Windsor Tower that burned a heck of a heck of a heck of a lot longer (18 to 20 times longer then the wtc and at proven hotter temperatures and left the entire steal structure still standing?
www.youtube.com...
Right. Next please:lol
Originally posted by prepare4it777
reply to post by jthomas
Actually with the CNN poll pointing to 84% of the American public in agreement with Charlie Sheen that there is a government cover up of the 9/11 events, that would in essence make the debunkers the actual tin foil hat wearing, denial based minority, and not the other way around.
Originally posted by HothSnake
reply to post by jthomas
I am quite capable. But why should I waste my time when it is already on record that you have been firmly debunked and you refuse to acknowledge it? Or when you indicate you are clueless about the subject matter?
Did you even make it past the first page? I knew that you would read the first page of ten and then claim that the debunkers won, but seeing that you are illiterate, then we are all just waisting our time here. They debunked nothing.. They did what you are doing here and called names, while providing nothing but pseudo science delivered up by the government. Clearly, you nor your counterpart are capable of anything but ad hom logical fallacy.
Oh yeah, that was what the NIST report and the MIT report both claimed.
Originally posted by prepare4it777
Actually with the CNN poll pointing to 84% of the American public in agreement with Charlie Sheen that there is a government cover up of the 9/11 events, that would in essence make the debunkers the actual tin foil hat wearing, denial based minority, and not the other way around.
Originally posted by jthomas
Truthers always get angry when they have to face the fact that denial is denial is denial, no matter what the subject matter is. You all get upset when other forms of denial are mentioned - like Holocaust denial - and immediately protest that "you are getting lumped with Holocaust Deniers" and "we don't deny the Holocaust, you Nazis!!"
On the contrary, I am one of those 84% believing there was a gov't coverup, namely, the concealment of just how badly the gov't was slipping on banana peels during the 9/11 attack and how it missed opportunities to prevent it. Seeing how badly the gov't was slipping on banana peels from simply handing out water bottles to hurricane victims in New Orleans, it's blatantly obvious there's more incompetence behind the 9/11 attack than what was reported, as well. If there was an intelligence memo warning of the attack that was misplaced and sitting underneath a pizza box in someone's office somehere, I'd want to know who that dope was.
Originally posted by jthomas
Originally posted by prepare4it777
reply to post by jthomas
Actually with the CNN poll pointing to 84% of the American public in agreement with Charlie Sheen that there is a government cover up of the 9/11 events, that would in essence make the debunkers the actual tin foil hat wearing, denial based minority, and not the other way around.
Facts by polls, eh?
Gosh, why bother with an investigation?
Originally posted by HothSnake
reply to post by Taxi-Driver
Please? Are you kidding me? The fire you referred to above burned for hours, and still no failure.
You're grasping for straws.
And the design was no where near as resilient as the Twin Towers, which only burned for minutes.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
reply to post by Taxi-Driver
We can clearly see the effects of large fires on steel structure. And while steel has many advantages, such as weight and pliability, one of the weaknesses is exposure to extreme heat. Therin lies the comparison of the different structures.
Originally posted by HothSnake
Now it's a psychological problem, eh?