How Would You.......?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 28-7-2009 @ 11:10 AM by Hazelnut
reply to post by Scott Creighton



Perhaps the Arctic Seed Vault would be the ideal place to conserve accumulated knowledge along with every seed known to man.



reply posted on 28-7-2009 @ 11:31 AM by chiron613
The first question to ask should be whether we really have all that much that is worthwhile to remember. The next question is whether any of that is relevant in a post-catastrophe world, where survival will rely more on basics than on advanced technology.

Writing and language will continue to exist, wherever it already exists. People don't need any technology to speak; it's built in. Writing requires some sort of surface and something to make marks. Figuring out how to make paper might be important. Groups can survive without writing, but it's still very important. Otherwise, knowledge is stored in the minds of the elders, passed along word of mouth.

Depending on what's left and how many people survive, we'll have to farm, hunt, or raise various cattle in a nomadic lifestyle. Different regions are likely to have different solutions, according to their terrain and population.

Most of what we know is irrelevant for survival. History, literature, music, art, biology, chemistry, physics, math - not necessary. Much of that - especially the sciences - has caused more trouble than it was worth. If we lose it, it might not be such a heavy loss after all. Maybe we could make a new start, and avoid some of the mistakes we made previously.

What I'd place in a time capsule is information that could enhance survival, period. That would include agriculture, hunting, and so on; it might even include some of the public sanitation knowledge. I'm not altogether certain I'd include medicine, because there is some evidence that medicine is the #1 cause of death, at least in the US. It seems that learning to drain a swamp, or to avoid such areas, is more important than trying to preserve a cure for malaria - especially when the technology to produce such drugs will remain beyond us for many long years.

Definitely I'd get anything I wanted into "hard copy", and not on a hard drive. Anything on a hard drive would, of course, be inaccessible. Metallurgy, tool making, the properties of materials (especially alloys); how to make glass, soap, other useful stuff.



reply posted on 28-7-2009 @ 11:50 PM by jkrog08
reply to post by Skyfloating



I´d make 5 copies of all this and place

one at the bottom of the ocean
one in a cave
one buried deeply underground
one out in the open (such as the Nazca lines or Pyramids)
and one that is only detectable by advanced technological means



While I understand the deeper meaning here, can you elaborate on those?

[edit on 7/28/2009 by jkrog08]


reply posted on 6-8-2009 @ 07:55 AM by the_plumber
reply to post by Scott Creighton



Hi Scott,

Thank you for your work... it's fantastic. I wanted to show you this video that may explain the science behind precession. Forgive me for being off topic but I wanted to get your attention, so I chose the thread you most recently posted to. Here's the video...

www.metacafe.com...

Thanks.

[edit on 6-8-2009 by the_plumber]


reply posted on 6-8-2009 @ 08:46 AM by argentus
I had a similar question. One of the difficult issues is how to make a sort of Rosetta Stone for the language. I think we have to assume that no traces or clues of our current languages would remain, so how to go about making a primer so that a future culture could interpret the documents?

Another issue....... on what media are the materials stored? We can't really assume that electronic files would survive even in a vacuum storage, or that the next civilization would develop in a way that they could use, say, a computer, even if one was stored with the files. So, that seems to suggest engraving symbols in something that we hope will last a very long time.

Another issue..... how to mark the storage area of a post-apocalyptic Earth?

Good thread. I'll be interested to see what we all come up with.


reply posted on 23-8-2009 @ 12:54 AM by undermind
In two hundred years, we'll be seen the way we view the 18th century.

In a thousand years or so, we'll be the ancients.



----------------------------------------------

Did people in the year 900 ever say to each around the fire;

"I wonder what the world will be like in the year 2009?"

I don't think it would've been too common a question since to ask it presumes, for example, that the end of the world wasn't at hand which may have contradicted religious teachings.

------------------------------------------------

A question I've wondered about:

Say you put an absolute top quality switched-on laptop computer in an airless, temperature-stable safe.

The energy supply to the computer is perfect, steady, and independent.

How long would the screen stay on for?


The heat generated by electrical resistance of certain components would very slowly begin to impact their own performance.

I would suggest maybe 45 years before the screen went blank.

But it would vary, possibly by a large amount, depending on the composition and heat-sink efficiency of the components.

And if it wasn't switched on, but had a solar power booster incorperated as one of the components?

The simpler the components, the less complex their contruction, and I would also suggest the largher the components, the longer they would last.

Thick glass, platinum, titanium, gold and special moulded plastic encased in Argon-infused stone and layered with platinum, titanium and stone.

I'm guessing. Maybe 3000 years?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^




ATS Live North America is broadcasting in 47 minutes.
Today's Show: ATS Live: 96: Super powers, Falklands Woes, Stan Deyo Interview, Syria, Telepathy, The Devils Chord.