reply to post by aik4on
Welcome to the thread... I will think it about it over the next few days,
But for now...
What you ask in not a simple task to present in a few pages, but I will attempt to come up with something for you...
My main purpose for this thread is to get people asking those questions that are not easy to answer.
Science as you may be aware does NOT have ALL the answers, and has never claimed to have.
Its a bit like the theory of evolution, it is forever developing which is the case in all development.
I believe myself, that we are Not highly advanced and the notion of us being highly advanced, is merely propaganda.
If we were highly advanced, we would Not be here, but instead exploring the universe. I mean crossing Galaxies in minutes...
The fact remains that we aren't, but I am optimistic that the day shall come, when we can do this, but there is still much for us to learn.
As new discoveries are made it will mould our understand regarding the true nature of our experience and its true origin as well as how it is
At this stage we are still only studying the end result and not the cause or the system that produces what we interpret as our or apparent reality.
Some do recognise that the system that produces our world is nothing at all like what we see in the end result or product.
I can't give you a complete story, because it will possibly never be completed, as whatever is producing it, is also developing and adding to the
My interest is more in how, what we observe is manifested in the first place..
I Not referring to anything religious or anything else of that nature.
Personally I believe that there is an intelligent or logic based process or structure underlying what we experience.
For us as a species, I suspect it will be at least another 1,000 years before we have enough information to push us in a more realistic path of
As for my understanding is concerned, it comes from work involving interactive interfaces, with what can only be described as perhaps the Mind,
Awareness, Consciousness or Life depending on what label you want to attach to it as there is no word that clearly defines it. It is very hard to
define in simple terms.
I look at it as a form of Consciousness that appears to be applied to or even attached to a Geometric based Algorithm that I can only describe in
English as a Geometric Algorithm of the Paradox.
I refer to it as the Paradox because in All things we find the opposites.
To describe the Algorithm is extremely involved as it appears as a simultaneous function or Containing simultaneous functions that are
multidimensional in its conceptual construction.
With regard to my understanding of Light I believe it is the Oscillation within the Paradoxical Algorithm. This is the Frequency of wave like
behaviour of Light in certain circumstances and particle like behaviour in other situations (Well documented in Science) but I think there is far more
involved with the theory light than what we believe at present.
There is more than one understanding of the theory of Light and non of these are easy to prove or disprove. In trying to discover the root algorithm
is not easy when looking from the end of the Result, as it involves a certain degree of “back-engineering” that is subjective in nature as Not all
the information of where it comes from, or what manifests or produces this phenomenon is readily available so we can only understand within the
boundaries of the end product and the course of understanding we take in the back-engineering process based on the rules laid down by our human
understanding that is not considered full proof by any stretch of the imagination.
But the R&D I have been involved in over the last 16 years (full time) has raised questions that I can only theorise about at this stage. But in
saying this, in the not so distant future I hope to demonstrate in a practical way what I have found.
I have found that what we call reality is produced from nothing but Concepts contained within a process based on Concepts involving A latticework,
that has produced a Partition Map which is used in/by the Processing System.
So far to date this has been documented and involves more than 50,000 drawings describing in detail the processing system, as well as detailing some
thousand instruction sets. I can present a portion of the processing system, but is probably very small in the overall system that portrays a few
hundred operations that I know of at present.
There is a series of books being written right now, that will detail the work done to date.
Not sure when these will be available, but the first of this series shouldn't be to far in the future.
But let me try and put something together for you over the next few days if I get a chance.