It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


This is how they will take our guns.

page: 5
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 07:16 PM
Specified Motor Vehicle: 43,354
Falls: 13,322
Poison: 12,757
Drowning: 3,842
Exposure Fire / Smoke: 3,337
Other Land Transport accidents: 1,492
Complications of Medicine / Surgery: 3,059

To the best of my knowledge there is not a specific right to any of the above listed in the Bill of Rights so if they want to debate about having waiting periods for drowning or making death by fire illegal then they can go ahead and do that.

But as for the right to keep and bear arms, well that is a right specifically stated in the Bill of Rights - that contract that we agreed upon in order to "create the beast" as Ben Franklin put it, so no, I don't care what the opponents say, the RIGHT to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 11:24 PM


In 1918, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1918 to 1953, about 30 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews, Catholics and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.


China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million ‘educated’ people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.


Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control:
56 million. (that number is an estimate, the actual number is probably higher)


It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.

The first year results are now in:

List of 7 items:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 30.
2 percent!

Australia-wide, assaults are up 88.
6 percent!

Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.
Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since criminals are now guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

You won’t see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

Take note my fellow Americans, before it’s too late!

The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.

With guns, we are ‘citizens’. Without them, we are ’subjects’.

During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!

If you value your freedom, Please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.

The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental.

1. Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he’ll just kill you.

2. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.

3. I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

4. When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away.

5. A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him ‘Why do you carry a 45?’ The Ranger responded, ‘Because they don’t make a 46.’

6. An armed man will kill an unarmed man with monotonous regularity.

7. The old sheriff was attending an awards dinner when a lady commented on his wearing his sidearm. ‘Sheriff, I see you have your pistol. Are you expecting trouble?’ ‘No Ma’am. If I were expecting trouble, I would have brought my rifle.’

8. Beware the man who only has one gun.

But wait, there’s more!

I was once asked by a lady visiting if I had a gun in the house. I said I did. She said ‘Well I certainly hope it isn’t loaded!’ To which I said, ‘Of course it is loaded, can’t work without bullets!’ She then asked, ‘Are you that afraid of someone evil coming into your house?’ My reply was, ‘No, not at all. I am not afraid of the house catching fire either, but I have fire extinguishers around, and they are all loaded too.’

To which I’ll add, having a gun in the house that isn’t loaded is like having a car in the garage without gas in the tank.

I’m a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment!

The 2nd Amendment isn’t about hunting Bambi, it’s about keeping government from hunting us.

posted on Jul, 28 2009 @ 01:50 AM
One last thought is this, our freedoms are a direct product of our resolve as a singled body democratic and free society. We must not let dissention between ourselves take a foot hold.

Those bothering with the left or the right are running in place so to speak. It is folly to think that either feet can move independently. They both move together to the beat of the same drum.

There are no more demos, no more rebos, just goverment who is taking your rights away under your nose and not even telling you about it. You will find out when your arrested and be shocked because you didn't even realize you were breaking a law.

posted on Jul, 28 2009 @ 11:56 AM
Not sure if anyone brought this up already BUT!!!!

How to kill two birds with one stone, no pun intended.

What if..... these children were vaccinated and died from that. Let's say they are the children of people who do not own guns and who do not like guns. Someone from the government has paid them a visit as they know the child had recieved the vaccination and they probably knew the outcome.

They offer the family condolences and a hefty sum of money to portray the death as a gun related incident. I know I am going WAY out on a limb here, but don't cut it off just yet.

They get the result they were looking for from the vaccination, the family needn't know that was the cause of death, the family gets some cash for the funeral expenses and maybe a bit of debt relief and the government gets MSM to portray it as "guns are out of control, we must remove ALL guns from the public!!!!"

My thesis/theory is based on years of experience with guns, gun safety and training and hunting with my family and their children. Never have these chldren ever pointed or played around with ANY gun when we were not in the woods or field. I understand that IF these alleged parents had safety first in mind this would not have happened, but that is what leads me to believe it's a fraud.

I don't think an actual gun owner could really be THAT negligent? Maybe but highly unlikely unless they are a gangbanger and don't care.

I mean look at the WTC, they had to come down, they were falling apart, why not get two birds with one stone and use it for the "terrorist agenda"?

Plausibility? Deductive Reasoning? Common Sense? The Eye of Horus?

Okay the Eye of Horus is a bit far but if you understand the Illuminati and the Masonic brotherhood you can easily see what they want and how they will get it.

Anyone, open for debate but I think it's pretty darn close. They are running out of options and are desperate. They seem like they will do anything to get us out of the way. The Megalomaniacs and Psychopathic Elite that is, thats the "THEY".

[edit on 28-7-2009 by daddio]

new topics

top topics
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in