Originally posted by projectvxn
Originally posted by Phenomium
Originally posted by projectvxn
I often tell those seeking to dive into the pool of "Conspiracy" that they refrain from drinking the water. It tastes bad and often makes you sick.
Agreed, yet what do you do when your government gives you nothing pure to drink?
[edit on 25-7-2009 by Phenomium]
Just try not to poison the well more through your actions and the rest leave up to time and research. So many in the "Conspiracy" crowd have no idea
what they're saying and how dangerous what they say can be, ESPECIALLY if it is not true. Even if it is true the immediate course of action is never
the wise one in hindsight, always be patient enough to acquire and amass enough facts to prove your assumptions and opinions wrong, especially if the
goal is to prove them right.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by projectvxn]
Yes, but the problem here is that you are categorizing and labeling one as a conspirator just for questioning their government or even being curious.
Just who exactly IS a conspiracy theorist? Beliefs and discussion is in no way a danger to anyone. Theorists "theorize" on things not "ACT" on
them. How would anyone on here, merely by discussing real-life or fantasy be poisoning a virtual well? You believe or you don't, no one is FORCED to
believe anything and those who fall for anything fantasy were already without wisdom.Many of the things on here are actual fact, the problem is that
we don't have the clearance to get the proof, and the FOIA Act is a joke. Only the government can be dangerous with the things they say or think that
affects people en masse. As we all know that "actions" begin with thought first, however, we here at ATS or any other (so called) conspiracy
theorists have no real power to do anything to anyone. If one were to murder because of what he heard on this forum, he is not a conspirator, he is a
murderer. If one were to assault or rape because of what they heard from a (so called) conspiracy theorist, it does not make him a conspirator, it
makes him liable for assault and rape as an offender. A conspiracy theorist without governmentally applied resources is no threat at all,....just
because the MSM tells you so. There is a reason though that the MSM is so hellbent on discrediting conspiracy theorists and that is because the only
danger lies in shining a light on the otherwise dark practices of a malignant government....there is NO OTHER DANGER from those who do this research
in nothing more than the name of freedom of mankind from the clutches of an already proven rogue government that wants the enslavement of all. Your
danger here, with all respect to you, seems to be that you are doing the same thing as the MSM and that is calling anyone and everyone who disagrees
with the government or has a curiosity for the well hidden secrets of our government a conspiracy theorist and labeling them with the same banner of
embarrassment as those who come in the name of lies and confusion (the tin foil at brigade). There are many that are called conspiracy theorists that
are elites in the white collar world as well as the movie industry, music industry and even the government such as Ron Paul/Dennis Kucinich who I
might add was decimated about a UFO sighting at the Presidential Candidate Debate in 2007.
There is a reason why there is only one term to cover EVERYONE who disagrees with the government and that is because it works so well.
So the danger is not in what one says as a conspiracy theorist, the danger lies in those who can actually DO the conspiracy.
[edit on 26-7-2009 by Phenomium]
[edit on 26-7-2009 by Phenomium]