|
|
Topic started on 25-7-2009 @ 09:27 AM by genius/idoit
|
 
I'm surprised that I haven't heard about this before but here you go www.freerepublic.com... where is the msm
on this never heard about it till I did a search,it's been kept pretty quite until now.If there is already a thread sorry just trying to get some
answers cause this guy(obabama) smells like rotten fish.
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Politicians & People topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 09:36 AM by mikerussellus
|

reply to post by genius/idoit
Good job!
Just read your post on the other thread, of course get ready to be labeled a "birther" and a racist!
S&F
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 09:38 AM by genius/idoit
|
reply to post by mikerussellus
Yeah I know but it's a small price to pay to deny ignorance.lol.have you ever heard this before?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 09:45 AM by mikerussellus
|
reply to post by genius/idoit
Never. But with this administrations history of misdirection, it makes more sense than anything else. I mean, why not keep the talk up about
WHERE he was born vs the smaller details of his birth record? Who was the father? Did they list religion?
This article appears to be less likely on a conspiracy website, only because it makes sense. And since the MSM hasn't touched this aspect of the
story (as far as we know) then I would lean to this being more accurate than anything else out there.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 10:26 AM by debunky
|
Evidence presented: erm... none?
The MSM don't run stories on Obama being a dalek disguised with a holographic field either.
They didn't even run stories on bush being a reptilian, and there was better evidence for that (Compression artifacts vs None whatsoever)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 10:43 AM by genius/idoit
|
reply to post by debunky
of course there's no proof if there was it wouldn't be a conspiracy.But the conspiracy here is to keep info like this out of the public eye.Did you
ever hear this before.and by the way can you provide proof he's not?Here's some more conjecture.
astuteblogger.blogspot.com... and more
www.classicalvalues.com... and more www.dailypaul.com... I don't know about proof but I
would like to see it debunked at least so we can move on.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 10:47 AM by FlyersFan
|
Yep, I've heard of him before. It is possible that this fella is Obama's biological father and not the fella from Kenya that abandoned Obama and
his mother (and had multiple wives at the same time).
Instead of 'All My Children', the soap should be 'The Obama Family'.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 10:58 AM by debunky
|
reply to post by genius/idoit
Who demanded proof?
Proof only exists in mathematics anyway.
But a tiny shred of evidence perhaps? He can't be a dalek in disguise, because we all know that the daleks cant build voice syntehsizers.
There is more evidence for him not being a dalek (see above) and for bush being a reptilian (just take a look at youtube) than was presented in that
piece you linked to.
Nothing
Nada
Zilch
Just "Hey, what if his father wasnt really his father wouldnt that be just soooo cool?"
Not to mention that if there was anything to it he would be the kid of 2 americans, and not just one. (hint: you gotta say his mum isn't his mum to
further your cause)
Edit to add: as for debunking it: what? there is nothing to debunk there. To falsify a statement you need more than some guy saying "it could be"
Dolphins are the 2nd most intelligent species on earth, the most intelligent is mice. Debunk that! (I can point you to a book that says that, so there
is *again* more evidence for that)
[edit on 25-7-2009 by debunky]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 11:12 AM by genius/idoit
|
reply to post by debunky
Alright I get your point, please try to get mine it isn't that FMD is obama's father its that I never even heard this scenario.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 01:23 PM by debunky
|
reply to post by genius/idoit
Trying to. Not certain i do.
There are propably a gazillion of szenrios you haven't heard about. Can't really give each of those 1 minute on TV. Gotta sort them at least a
little bit by evidence provided. And conceivings are usually notoriously low on witnesses
I mean i don't really expect the story of Obama not being a Dalek hit the headlines anytime soon, though I thoroughly debunked that one!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 01:36 PM by ChrisF231
|
Frank Marshall Davis is the "Frank" that Obama writes so lovingly of in Dreams from my Father ... Obama saw this man as sort of a mentor.
For the uninformed, Frank Marshall Davis was a big time Communist Party USA member. Obama even writes later in the book that when at Columbia he
preferred the company of Marxists, Communists and the like.
Things do not bode well for us.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by ChrisF231]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-7-2009 @ 04:00 PM by Kaleokualoha
|
Originally posted by ChrisF231
Obama saw this man as sort of a mentor. For the uninformed, Frank Marshall Davis was a big time Communist Party USA member.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by ChrisF231]
Wrong. Davis was not a big time CPUSA member, nor was he Obama's mentor. He was a closet member of the CPUSA, and there is no evidence that Obama
even knew of his CPUSA membership during WWII.
Although Obama's book indicates "Frank" was a family friend who offered him advice on racial issues, Obama wrote that Davis "fell short" and his
views were "incurable." Obama did not even visit Davis for three years before going to college. Obama's book, itself, proves that Obama did not
consider Davis to be a "wise and trusted counselor," which is the definition of "mentor." By what creative definition can Davis be considered his
"mentor"?
By exaggerating evidence that Davis advised Obama, yet ignoring evidence from the same source that Obama did NOT Frank to be a wise and trusted
advisor, those who claim Davis was Obama's "mentor" are as dishonest as ex-D.A. Mike Nifong. The "Nifong Syndrome" is the stacking of evidence
by ignoring evidence that does not fit one's agenda.
A disinformation campaign, spearheaded by Cliff Kincaid's "Accuracy In Media" and supported by the linked Free Republic, consisted of a series of
small lies fabricated to support the big lie that "His values, passed on to Obama, were those of a communist agent who pledged allegiance to Stalin"
(see www.aim.org...). A painstakingly documented analysis of Kincaid's falsehoods is posted as
"specific misrepresentation" at my.barackobama.com... I invite any person of integrity to refute my
evidence against his body of lies. If he had authentic evidence of Davis's radical influence, he would not need to fabricate such evidence.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 27-7-2009 @ 05:47 PM by Kaleokualoha
|
For the uninformed, and for those who delight in conspiracy theories (what? here?), the disinformation campaign run by right-wing pundits against the
Obama-Davis relationship has all the earmarks of a classic disinformation campaign.
As a retired Air Force Intelligence Officer with specific training in Deception Analysis by the C.I.A. in 1989, I am researching political
disinformation. My security access was indeed Above Top Secret, as I had intelligence SCI (SI/TK/G) and operations Special Access Program access.
I am familiar with disinformation campaigns, starting with Operation Fortitude protecting the D-Day invasion, through Operation Left Hook protecting
the coalition drive into Kuwait, and deconstructing “deliberate misrepresentation” of the Iraqi threat this century.
Consider the Iraqi threat in 2002. Does anyone deny that the Bush administration deliberately misrepresented the Iraqi threat to garner support for
the invasion? Now THAT was a disinformation campaign!
Most Americans, unlike most foreigners, believed without question that Iraq was working with Al Qaeda, and believed without question that Iraq had
stockpiles of WMD. They believed these due to deception ("deliberate misrepresentation") by the Bush administration. Any disagreement?
The same disinformation technique, albeit on a smaller scale, was used by right-wing opponents of Barack Obama. Through innuendo, half-truths and
outright fabrication, Obama’s opponents have deliberately misrepresented a casual family friendship as sordid political indoctrination sessions or
worse. In their fervor to malign Obama, they sought to transform the legacy of a relatively obscure leftist poet into a “Stalinist agent” who
corrupted Obama’s values. Slander and libel were their tools of the trade, because truth was no obstacle. Destroying Davis’s reputation was
collateral damage.
Although “I'm hardly interested in proving my research to Kincaid or any of those whose work is a travesty to scholarship," University of Kansas
Professor Edgar Tidwell, whom AIM's Cliff Kincaid cites as "an expert on the life and writings of Davis," dismisses misrepresentation of Davis's
influence in one simple paragraph:
"Although my research indicates that Davis joined the CPUSA as a "closet member" during World War II, there is no evidence that he was a Stalinist,
or even a Party member before WWII. Further, to those attempting to make the specious stand for the concrete, there is no evidence that he instructed
Barack Obama in communist ideology. Frank Marshall Davis did NOT believe in overthrowing the USA. He was committed to what the nation professed to
be. For him, communism was primarily an intellectual vehicle to achieve a political end-a possible tool for gaining the constitutional freedoms of
life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for ALL Americans" (see my.barackobama.com... ).
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 31-7-2009 @ 08:58 PM by Kaleokualoha
|
For detailed analysis of just one element of AIM's disinformation campaign against Davis, please read this post:
1949 Honolulu NAACP Incident. It reveals how AIM misrepresented the
Congressional testimony of NAACP rookie, Edward Berman, in four different posts DESPITE posting transcripts of Berman's actual testimony.
For a comprehensive analysis of AIM's disinformation campaign, please review "specific misrepresentation" at my
"Redbaiting Barack Obama" post.
Conspiracy theorists may be somewhat disappointed because this particular conspiracy requires no speculation or investigation. The deception is
obvious to anyone who reads the cited open source material. If you find any fault in my analysis, please advise. Thanks!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |