posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 02:31 PM
With the many subjects that some say "prove" the landing
or the hoax, each can
be explained to further their thesis, but evidence that one suggests validates their position is not proof per se, but rather, arbitrary opinion at
Some say man could not survive travelling through the Van Allen radiation belt
others say the moon landing
was staged and produced by
non other than Stanley Kubrick
and Kubrick's connection to Apollo here
Some also say it is strange coincidences such as Houston, we have a
problem: original moon walk footage erased
is in perfect alignment of what one might expect from those supressing a conspiracy of this
distance themselves quietly from Ares I
Anyways, if you say the "hoax" videos were made to supress the rel imagery which included structuresUFO's and life forms visible in the real
Explains away the existence of the staged films.
Now what is left? The Van-Allen Radiation Belt?
This one is tough to overcome.
I think whoever you debate, this is the most key question to be answered.
I will observe your debate in hope that it will be more than a he said she said exchange.
Scientific data plz....
I am not offering to debate, just offering what I feel are issues that need to be addressed above all others.
-will be watching...
[edit on 27-7-2009 by imd12c4funn]