It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OK....Who Wants To Go Head To Head On The Moon Landings?

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 24 2009 @ 11:55 PM
link   
Ladies and Gentlemen...

As it is the 40th anniversary of the Moon Landings, (Or Not
) I'm looking for two members to go head to head in the Debate Forum on whether the Moon Landings actually happened or were they all a big conspiracy?

Actual title and specifics to be decided after we have the opponents...

Just send me a U2U if you are interested..

Two members will be chosen, but all U2U's will be answered.

Semper




posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 05:22 AM
link   
im game

I say we went !!

"kinda" ; D



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 06:18 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 06:31 AM
link   
There's enough people who still think it was a hoax, come on, let's hear the evidence! They didn't build the most powerful machine ever to fake some pictures for the Russians...

I could be wrong, I'm hoping this debate will settle the matter once and for all, at least on ATS. I'm hoping anyway...



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 01:03 PM
link   
I'm no scientist, but isn't the sun will be too hot for someone standing at the lighted area of the moon?

No, they haven't land there, and with sooo many money spend, why not put something usefull there? telescope, satelite, homing device video probe?


I say it is a hoax



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 01:50 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 02:42 PM
link   
We did go but not on the day that the world was told.




posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 04:31 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 04:35 PM
link   
OK people, this is not a thread to debate the issue, only to notify you of the upcoming debate and to let you U2U myself if interested.

Thank you

Semper



posted on Jul, 25 2009 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by fatdad

 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



i thought we where debating it...sry...



posted on Jul, 26 2009 @ 02:17 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 01:45 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 04:16 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 05:16 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 06:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by semperfortis
OK people, this is not a thread to debate the issue, only to notify you of the upcoming debate and to let you U2U myself if interested.

Thank you

Semper



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 12:25 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Can I choose my side? I refuse to be on the side of the ignorant.



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 01:31 PM
link   
I nominate Phage to the debate and I don't care what side he's on.
( I know this isn't how it's supposed to work, but I'm nominating him anyway because I hope he signs up.:lol



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 02:31 PM
link   
With the many subjects that some say "prove" the landing or the hoax, each can be explained to further their thesis, but evidence that one suggests validates their position is not proof per se, but rather, arbitrary opinion at most.

Some say man could not survive travelling through the Van Allen radiation belt, while others say the moon landing was staged and produced by non other than Stanley Kubrick.

Examples: here, here, and Kubrick's connection to Apollo here.

Some also say it is strange coincidences such as Houston, we have a problem: original moon walk footage erased is in perfect alignment of what one might expect from those supressing a conspiracy of this magnitude.

More recently, NASA contractors distance themselves quietly from Ares I .

Anyways, if you say the "hoax" videos were made to supress the rel imagery which included structuresUFO's and life forms visible in the real footage.
Explains away the existence of the staged films.

Now what is left? The Van-Allen Radiation Belt?

This one is tough to overcome.

I think whoever you debate, this is the most key question to be answered.

I will observe your debate in hope that it will be more than a he said she said exchange.

Scientific data plz....

I am not offering to debate, just offering what I feel are issues that need to be addressed above all others.

-will be watching...

[edit on 27-7-2009 by imd12c4funn]



posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 02:46 PM
link   
Semp' has advised us that he has the two debaters, so I'm closing this thread.

Thank you for your interest.


Peace



new topics

top topics



 
5

log in

join