It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Copernicus
Well, two possibilities:
1) The author of this thread made up a story and posted a photoshopped picture with a UFO picture inserted against the white background.
2) That is a flying object. Its not a raindrop or balloon or anything like that, and people who write that are simply dumb or are trying to divert attention towards themselfs. Sometimes this tactic is effective since it can make people doubt themselfs.
Thanks for posting this.
[edit on 2-8-2009 by Copernicus]
Originally posted by Sam60
Originally posted by Copernicus
Well, two possibilities:
1) The author of this thread made up a story and posted a photoshopped picture with a UFO picture inserted against the white background.
2) That is a flying object. Its not a raindrop or balloon or anything like that, and people who write that are simply dumb or are trying to divert attention towards themselfs. Sometimes this tactic is effective since it can make people doubt themselfs.
Thanks for posting this.
[edit on 2-8-2009 by Copernicus]
Sorry....I know I might be sounding like the "parking cop" for this thread.
However, you should read the sections where Springer & Jritzmann get involved. There's no "dumbness" there. Far from it. The analysis is extremely interesting, as it always is when those two are involved.
Also, the op has been a great sport about the whole thing.
Originally posted by WorldObserver
The angle, lighting, position all look wrong.
Originally posted by WorldObserver
looks a lot like a fake to me - badly photoshopped in.
I promise you I did not Photoshop/fake my picture even if the angle, lighting, position all look wrong to you and I am not here to bulls**t anyone. As I stated earlier on, I did mess about with contrast and sharpness but that is all I did to the picture. So that leave's the angle and Position of my raindrop - please explain why you mean about the angle/position as Im keen to know why you state this
Regards
Bhb
[edit on 2-8-2009 by Beauty_HairyBeast]
Originally posted by Urias
23 pages discussing a frickin' raindrop!?!?
This forum is amazing.
Originally posted by Copernicus
You can make this object look like something natural. Doesnt mean it is. And by that logic, nothing will ever be identified as a alien ship. There will always be possible to say its something else.
You can take a picture of a airplane and show the same pictures and say its a raindrop too. Or a bird. Or whatever you like.