It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DemonicAngelZero
Crop circles aren't exactly hard to make, but they are nice to look at. It's cool how complex some are made.
Something I haven't heard about in a while is unusual properties of crop circles that are significantly harder to reproduce. Like how the stocks seemed to have been microwaved and unusual magnetic fields. Batteries going dead and people feinting or feeling messed up. Either way, I'd think serious researchers who visit circles should be able to tell if it's man made or an unknown. Not going to say alien origin, global consciousness, or ball lightning. It's just an unknown.
Originally posted by amari
WOW that is great! Beautiful - I wonder if anyone will try and decipher it.
could be an interesting decipher!
You are looking at an energy device that when rotated or spinning at a high velocity creates anti gravity and perpetual propulsion energy. The inside sphere is the energy source for the rotating magnetic field and outside the ring you have 12 rotating circular propulsion fluxtrons. The outward flow of the energy field is bending the 2 stabilizer horizontal line bars within each fluxtron as you see the perpendicular dash looking concentrated energy charged field line bars pushing outward towards them when rotating.
The significance is the number of geometric in design energized staggered polarity stabilizers surrounding the inside sphere that contain corresponding number sets 3, 6 and 3. The polarity staggered stabilizers with the T design inside is one set of 3. The 3 verticals in each of the 6 isosceles triangle shapes concentrate the polarized energy field as the stabilizers rotate. The set of 3 polarity stabilizers contains the geometric designs that offset the plus and minus polarity. The other rotating spheres all play a part in the polarity shifting, balancing and charging of the complete propulsion energy device.
This my friends I believe is the schematic diagram in the form of a crop circle of how the anti-gravity disc shaped space craft propulsion system functions. ^Y^
This beauty crop circle dimensions and measurements are too perfect in every way throughout the schematic diagram to be off the cuff man made.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by amari]
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow
Is it not true to say that it's just taking electricity from that atoms of the device itself, and replacing the energy from just matter around it, therefore not making it perpetual, but just an energy graber from an environment?
[edit on 25-7-2009 by Gorman91]
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by jfj123
changing it isn't the word. New evidence was shown, so it was redefined.
Hawking's radical new thinking, presented in a paper to the 17th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation in Dublin, capped his three-decade struggle to explain an elemental paradox in scientific thinking: How can black holes destroy all traces of consumed matter and energy, as Hawking long believed, when subatomic theory says such elements must survive in some form?
Hawking's answer is that the black holes hold their contents for eons but themselves eventually deteriorate and die. As the black hole disintegrates, they send their transformed contents back out into the infinite universal horizons from whence they came.
The entire basis of it is not different.
they used to think that black holes went so far deep, gravity wise, that they were really a worm hole. This was revoked when it was discovered that black holes have an ergo sphere, poles, etc etc and are basically just dark stars.
Also I did not use star trek to support my claim. I used it as an example to show where you are coming from. You act as if we know nothing and it will be centuries before we break the crust of the universe, just like star trek pointed out. But the reality is that we know a lot more, and like star trek, your views are archaic and wrong.
We know bountiful amounts about the universe, and we never have to get off this rock.
Again, I invite you to explain to me how I am wrong and why it would be sooo difficult to do.
Also, star gate uses wormholes, not black holes. :p
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by jfj123
No. He changes what black holes do, not what they are. They are still areas with gravity so strong that nothing can escape once entering the event horizon. Thus, what I described is still possible. All he did is realize that space time cannot be broken, it is a thing that bends onto infinity.
What I want to do still works. And for the third time, I invite you to disprove it.
Originally posted by prepare4it777
I'm sorry but those circles are perfect circles. Plank and rope sounds a little like it would leave to much room for error in a place where you don't have room for any mistakes.
Originally posted by prepare4it777
I'm sorry but those circles are perfect circles. Plank and rope sounds a little like it would leave to much room for error in a place where you don't have room for any mistakes.