It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
You've changed your tune a little bit. Now you are asking if it was. Because you are the only person claiming that it was, I am going to say no, I don't beleive it.
So just to be clear, you don't believe most of Flight 93 was buried underground?
Just show me or point me to this report already. Why the games?
Could it be possible? Well, one thing we would have to first qualify is the 80% by weight or by volume? That makes a huge difference. If the the engines were embedded than that could account for 80% roughly by weight but not by volume.
Just show me the doc or admit that this all just a figment of your imagination.
Originally posted by CaptainAmerica2012
No debunker. intellectual or even seasoned pseudoskeptic can prove that a Boeing commercial air liner crashed in the Stoystown shanksville field on the morning of 911 in Pennsylavania.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
reply to post by ATH911
Nope
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
Absolutely, uh, I think.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
Absolutely, uh, I think.
Agreed, I don't think a 757 buried itself either.
But Swampy thinks most of one did. You agree that he is wrong about that?
Originally posted by tatersalad
reply to post by ATH911
ATH, thanks for your more than enlightening information, but it seems as if the same old debunkers come onto these types of forums, for round 5 of insanity then round 6,7 and 8. my god, do these same people who beleive this official story from our government actually beleive it? So, if they beleive these assanine reports, do they also beleive that the economy will recover in the 3rd quarter?
Bill Hicks comes to mind with this insanity" GO BACK TO SLEEP AMERICA YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS IT ALL UNDER CONTROL.
THINK i need some of this equilibrium KOOL AID that some of these members are inhaling in!!!
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by hooper
Swamp thinks most of Flight 93 was buried.
You think most of Flight 93 did not bury (as do I!).
You guys are at odds. Who's right and who's wrong?
[edit on 1-9-2009 by ATH911]
Originally posted by hooper
Swamp says more than 50%, I think less than 50%.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
Swamp says more than 50%, I think less than 50%.
You guys can't have it both ways!
And you Hooper actually have quite a problem if you think it's less than 50%, because the FBI says they recovered 95% of the plane and if you look at the crash scene photos before they started the cleanup, you can see there less than 5% of debris above ground, so you have quite a bit of explaining to tell us where most of that 95% was after the alleged crash!
Funny thing is, 80% of the plane being buried actually makes more sense to explain how 95% of the plane could be recovered when less than 5% is seen above ground! It's just too bad there is just no proof that most of a 757 was buried there!
Quite the dilemma for you skeptics. Quite the dilemma.
Originally posted by hooper
Oh, I see now. You have an FBI spokesman telling a reporter that 95% of the plane was recovered (not exactly an official report, is it?)
and you have officially and unilaterlally declared that what photos you have seen constitutes 5% of the plane and therefore the other 90% must be buried. Very tricky, but sorry, a big failure. [/url]
Well if it's such a big failure, why don't you tell me what % of Flight 93 wreckage do you see in the scene photos before the cleanup started?
Your unilateral declarations are not exactly what I would call an "official report" as you openly stated and you are therefore lying.
Shame, shame.
As I've said, I've never said there was an "official report," so you are lying that I'm lying.