The news NEVER reported where most of the passenger were located after the alleged crash.
Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Does it really matter exactly where each pitifully small piece of human being was recovered from?
Are you that ghoulish that you need to know so and so's 3rd vetrabrae was recovered in the crater and their little toe was found 20 feet outside the crater?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
Why do you insist on this myth that 95% of the plane was "buried"?
Flight 77 crashed into a building, a confined space, a box, hence, the remains of the plane and passengers was also confined to a finite location. Flight 93 crashed into an open field. You can see there is a difference.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
Why do you insist on this myth that 95% of the plane was "buried"?
80%. That's the official claim. Do you agree with that claim? yes or no
Please show or direct me to the document and source for the "80% claim".
Flight 77 crashed into a building, a confined space, a box, hence, the remains of the plane and passengers was also confined to a finite location. Flight 93 crashed into an open field. You can see there is a difference.
Yet hardly anything of that plane was left, but they were able to map out the passengers bodies and 95% of Flight 93 was supposedly RECOVERED (not meaning all of that was buried. 80% was that claim) but no bodies and only 8% total body mass recovered. Please tell me you don't believe that!
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by ATH911
As to the OP it begs the same question as your other recent statments, where is the "official" claim that 80% of the plane was buried?
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by hooper
It's about 24 sedan cars. Don't tell me they only have a pic of one engine part coming out of the ground and the news never reported when it was realized that most of the plane was underground.
