Originally posted by ATH911

Always skipping over the tough questions.

No, i didn't. I clearly stated that I do know know how much of the aircraft ended up underground.

I am only being honest. That is far from skipping.

Why didn't the news media report it when most of Flight 93, that had 44 passengers inside it, was supposedly found buried deep underground when it was previously thought that most of the plane had disintegrated?

I answered one.. now your turn. You tell me what you think happened on 911 in Shanksville....

I will in turn answer your question. (I will need sources for your alleged media discrepancies.)

Thank you.

-CF

Originally posted by CameronFox
I answered one.. now your turn. You tell me what you think happened on 911 in Shanksville....

Ask me in the appropriate thread. You skeptics always like to go off-topic to water-down the threads you don't like.

(I need sources for your alleged media discrepancies.)

Read the link in the OP. Sheesh.

Originally posted by CameronFox
Watch the attacks ATH... or you will be talking to yourself in your threads.

I refuse to give anyone who is a holocaust denier a "hit" on their website. Jack Blood is just as much a fruit loop at KillClown.

And then you go right ahead and attack truthers.

Bye! Have fun staying off my thread!



[edit on 26-7-2009 by ATH911]

Skeptics, isn't it logical that the reason the news didn't report when it was discovered that most of the plane was buried is because it was never buried? The news doesn't wait until a month later to report things of this magnitude.

[edit on 29-7-2009 by ATH911]

Here is a real plane crash. Just recent.










Now here is flight 93 that 'crashed' in Shanksville Penn on September 11th,2001.


Quite obvious that a boeing 757 did not crash there.

The pictures dont lie. They say a million things but most importantly, one.

No Boeing 757 crashed in Shanksville on 9/11 (flight 93)


[edit on 31-7-2009 by CaptainAmerica2012]

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
There is a reason that Killtown was banned from ATS (and a few other sites I am told). I will grant that whoever he/she is, is very good at painting misleading pictures.

What was the reason?

The whole gist of his/her argument is that apperantly the media should have had cameras recording everything at the crashsite. That never happens.

Talk about painting a misleading picture. No one says the FBI should have photographed every single piece of wreckage coming out of the excavated hole, but when they claim 80% was buried and they produce only ONE PHOTO of ONE piece of sizable plane wreckage coming out (that engine piece), it's a little, no, LOT hard to believe that most of a 757 was really buried. That's not even mentioning that the piece of engine in that ONE and only photo they produced was shown that it was most likely just lowered in by the excavator scooper seen next to it for a photo shoot!

Rarely do you EVER hear the media saying exactly what was found on what day at a crash site..with the exception of the data recorders.

They mentioned on 9/13 that the engine piece in that one photo was found along with the FDR recorder. Why did they stop there? Why didn't they mention most of the plane seems to be buried in the ground to and most likely most of the passengers?

The news usually reports where most of the passengers were found. So in Shanksville, where WERE most of the passengers found?!

[edit on 1-8-2009 by ATH911]

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
So do the research. If you are good enough, you might find the article that says that based on where their remains were found in the wreckage, a couple of the passengers had appearantly breached the cockpit door, if not gained full entry into the cockpit just prior to the crash.

I did. The news NEVER reported where most of the passenger were located after the alleged crash. Just like they never reported when most of the plane was allegedly found.

Any LOGICAL explanation for that one Swampy? Remember, treason is punishable by death.

Originally posted by ATH911

I did. The news NEVER reported where most of the passenger were located after the alleged crash. Just like they never reported when most of the plane was allegedly found.

Any LOGICAL explanation for that one Swampy? Remember, treason is punishable by death.

Then, quite frankly, you suck at research. I have no problem finding article after article discussing the recovery of the wreckage and of human remains at the Flight 93 crash site. You seem to be stuck on not seeing a specific article saying that seat 12-A was recovered on Sept 14.

Remember, treason is punishable by death.

If I were you, I would get a dictionary and look up the definition of treason. Because you do not seem to know what it is....or you are trying to scare me. If it is the latter, you will have to do better. My oath to the Constitution is intact and Ive been shot at too many times to be scared of dying.

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
Then, quite frankly, you suck at research. I have no problem finding article after article discussing the recovery of the wreckage and of human remains at the Flight 93 crash site.

No, it's your COMPREHENSION that sucks. Here's what I said again (pay attention):

The news NEVER reported where most of the passenger were located after the alleged crash.

If I were you, I would get a dictionary and look up the definition of treason. Because you do not seem to know what it is....or you are trying to scare me.

Well if you're not committing treason, then you don't have anything to worry about, right?

[edit on 3-8-2009 by ATH911]