Further proof UA93 didn't bury, media skipped it, page 17

Pages: << 14 15 16 17 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:35 AM by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
How childish, Roger.

See everyone what kind of person gavron is, he has to call people names and cannot post what is asked for.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:38 AM by gavron

Originally posted by REMISNE
...cannot post what is asked for.

I thought 5 times was enough to post the same exact information.

You know, if you scroll up on a thread, it allows you to view previous posts. You can even click LINKS in those threads.

I'm hoping that helps you navigate better here, Roger. Perhaps it will help you in your search for the truth.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:42 AM by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
I thought 5 times was enough to post the same exact information.

I did not ask for the link i asked for the exact statement. Please read post before repsonding

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:43 AM by gavron

Originally posted by REMISNE

I did not ask for the link i asked for the exact statement.

Perhaps this link will assist you Roger:

www.jod911.com...

Your source....that you provided.

Assertion 7.

I'm hoping it helps you!

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:50 AM by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
Perhaps this link will assist you Roger:

Thanks for showing everyone that you cannot read and you cannot post what is asked for.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:52 AM by gavron

reply to post by REMISNE

Actually I believe everyone here is grateful for the information that I have posted (which actually, YOU provided). It puts to rest so many of the conspiracy claims by truthers.

Thanks again, Roger!

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:54 AM by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
Actually I believe everyone here is grateful for the information that I have posted.

You have not posted anything i asked for.

Everyone can see how dishonest you really are.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:57 AM by gavron

Originally posted by REMISNE
You have not posted anything i asked for.

Correct. I'm only posting the truth. You are asking for things that are not true at all, or don't even exist.

However, I have posted valuable links that answer the questions truthfully, and are not subject to ridiculous conspiracy claims.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 11:58 AM by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
Correct. I'm only posting the truth.

Funny, you would not know the truth. You cannot even post something so simple that i have askled for.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 12:01 PM by gavron

Originally posted by REMISNE
You cannot even post something so simple that i have askled for.

Actually, everyone here has seen that I have repeatedly posted that information. However you are to childish or stubborn to review that information. Just because it goes against your ridiculous conspiracy theory does not make it wrong.

Just posting the facts. The truth. If you cannot handle that, it is your problem, not the publics.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 12:12 PM by REMISNE

Originally posted by gavron
Just posting the facts. The truth. If you cannot handle that, it is your problem, not the publics.

Yet agian you show you cannot post what is asked for.

reply posted on 14-4-2010 @ 06:26 PM by ATH911

Originally posted by hooper
Why does the adjective matter? Only you seem to really care.

Because the physical evidence must fit the official story, agreed?

Who is they?

The FBI and crew who were doing the cleanup.

Why would they have ever made this so-called "realization"?

Well if most of the wreckage found was locating underground, soon they would have realized that after continuously unearthing lots and lots of plane debris upon digging (it's common sense hooper).

Why would anyone speculated about the ratio of human remains locations? WHY????

Because the first thing people want to know about a plane crash is what happened to the passengers (it's common sense hooper).

Why do you not want to know the finer details of this crash hooper? Is it because deep down you know it doesn't fit the official story?

reply posted on 5-5-2010 @ 05:56 PM by ATH911

Yet another video of the Flight 93 Ambassadors saying most of the plane had buried and over 90% was recovered in total, consistent with the FBI's claim of 95% recovered.

YouTube Link

Flight 93 Memorial Ambassador: ...before impact, [Flight 93] turned on its back and then it just telescoped into the ground. It hit at 580mph, which is cruising speed.

Gideon: How much of the plane was recovered?

Ambassador: Over 90%

Gideon: Where was it -- was it all found in the crater?

Ambassador: Basically all in the crater.
There were few small pieces [above ground], but basically everything was recovered from in the ground.

So this begs the question, why did it take about a FULL YEAR until the media started reporting that most of the plane had buried?

[edit on 5-5-2010 by ATH911]

reply posted on 5-5-2010 @ 06:07 PM by hooper

reply to post by ATH911

"....all in the crater"

And this is "proof" it was buried? They aren't even the same words.

Yes, I guess they should have stopped all the presses, ignored America going to war, the thousands of dead Americans being laid to rest, the ongoing recovery mission at ground zero in Manhattan and immeadiately have reported the earth shattering and heretofore unheard of situation wherein the remains of a crashed airplane were found were the ariplane crashed.

Wow

reply posted on 5-5-2010 @ 06:19 PM by ATH911