UFO Crash Event: Shag Harbor, 1967

page: 4
47
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join

posted on May, 12 2010 @ 10:42 AM
link   
I will be in this area in August, doing some of my own UFO research on and near Campobello Island (located almost directly west from this event).

The whole area up there has some UFO history to it. more to come later.




posted on Nov, 24 2010 @ 07:38 AM
link   
Reports and newspaper clippings about the incident:




Shag_Harbor_File_RCAC.pdf
SITREP - UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT
This is a couple of reports and newspaper clippings combined in one document.
Document date: 1967-10-06
Department: CAF Operations
Author: Col. W.W. Turner
Document type: Report
pages: 13


FOIA: SITREP - UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT - Shag Harbor



posted on Dec, 9 2010 @ 01:13 PM
link   
No pictures of the crashed craft I assume.



posted on Dec, 11 2010 @ 06:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Cassius666
No pictures of the crashed craft I assume.


I assume if there were the OP would have posted them.

What are your thoughts on the incident?



posted on Mar, 24 2011 @ 03:47 PM
link   
Shameless bump
edit on 02/10/08 by karl 12 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2011 @ 03:14 PM
link   
There is a photo of the Shag Harbour object(s), I am pretty sure one of the documentaries shows the image , although, I can find no trace of it online at the moment.



posted on Dec, 8 2011 @ 05:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by FireMoon
There is a photo of the Shag Harbour object(s), I am pretty sure one of the documentaries shows the image , although, I can find no trace of it online at the moment.


Firemoon, here we go mate -see Wilfred Eisnor's image at 4:14





Cheers.



posted on Feb, 17 2012 @ 08:51 AM
link   
Chris Styles discusses the Shag Harbour incident and reveals new info - podcast number 467:






Chris Styles Shag Harbour UFO investigator & with Don Ledger author of Dark Object: The Shag Harbour Incident reveals some new info on the case


link



posted on May, 6 2012 @ 05:44 PM
link   
More from researcher Chris Styles about government documents on the case:



Part One:




Shag Harbour has a paper trail a mile wide, from various government and military agencies, as well as film of the actual retrieval operation which was shown right across the country on the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) evening news. After the event, and after the government's claims that nothing of any import occurred, it faded away completely. Faded, only to be resuscitated 26 years later by the indefatigable Christopher Styles, a researcher from Halifax and MUFON's Assistant Director for Nova Scotia. Chris' work on this case is nothing short of phenomenal, and all the more exemplary considering this was his first formal investigation.


More



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 03:40 PM
link   
Case covered in 'Best Evidence-Top 10 UFO sightings' documentary with more information about the object submerging and travelling underwater all the way up the Lockport coast - see 13:30




posted on Sep, 22 2012 @ 08:26 PM
link   
This is a very well made thread and i would consider this case "interesting" - but it's one of those cases which, ultimately, is quite frustrating.

In a nutshell, we have really not a lot to work with except that many witnesses "saw something crashing" into the water - and then this is already the end of the entire case and what we know.

I can hardly consider something like that as good "evidence" for ET craft or UFOs.

One major factor here that the date this happened, 1967, just reeks of cold war secret military experiments and/or secret space launches, on both sides, the US and Russia.

We can hardly expect that if any super-secret cold war weapon (eg. a satellite etc.) was indeed coming down that we'd (EVER) get the details since we can assume this is all kept secret. This would involve any US programs...but also anything Russian.

It's interesting to note that the witnesses did NOT report an UFO initially but that the UFO story was released later ("by the authorities") which could very well be disinfo to further obscure something which was not supposed to be public. It is also interesting to note that the witnesses could not even see the shape of the object, all they saw was lights.

This case has so many holes and there is barely anything to go by..ok, we obviously have "lots of documents"...but barely any facts even as basic and simple as the shape of the object.

In my opinion, more likely some secret military project, crashed spy satellite, anti sub weapon etc..

>>
It was also claimed by several of the witnesses that units of the United States armed forces were involved in the search.
>>

Ah..yep..I was just waiting for this.
edit on 22-9-2012 by flexy123 because: (no reason given)





new topics
top topics
 
47
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join