A reason for why you cannot see most of the anomiltys is because they are on the darkside....
Try these out
www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...
www.lunaranomalies.com...
The Ley Line
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1949. Two years after Roswell and Mt. Rainier. In the mounting bliss of the Baby-Boom, one science Fiction writer cast his thoughts into the future; a
future that he expected us all to be sharing in by now. The following excerpts from "The Conquest Of Space" by Willy Ley, speak of a Moon strange
and mysterious,
a Moon reached by spaceships, a Moon awaiting the inevitable touch of Man.
Dale Ferguson; a writer in his own right, alerted Planetary Mysteries to the optimism and adventure underlying this brave new world, and we; from our
vantage point in the world of the future where all this should have come to pass by now, gladly share it with you. Optimism and adventure are still
alive and well thank you very much, but perhaps the operative phrase should have been "We'll never know until WE get there."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FuIl moon is not the best time for observing. When the sun rises or sets over the lunar landscape, the rims of the ringwalls cast long shadows which
betray their shape. But when the moon is full to us and the sun stands vertically over maria and mountains, everything iooks flat and only differences
of color show in a virtually featureless picture. However, on the moon's northern hemisphere, in that "classical corner;" there is the large crater
of Plato. Sunrise over Plato is just like sunrise over any other crater. But as the dividing line between darkness and light, the terminator,
advances, the floor of Plato grows darker. At high noon it looks like an inkspot. What happens in the crater of Plato; Evaporation of moisture forming
a light-absorbing mist? Or just melting ice? Or crystals with freakish optical qualities? The mystery of Plato has recently deepened further, because
the most active group of planetary observers today, beaded by W. H. Haas*, contradicts the by now almost traditional assertion that Plato Iooks gray
at lunar sunrise and black at lunar noon. It is highly unIikely that all the older observers have been wrong; after all, they were not talking about a
minor detail but about a very.conspicuous feature, it is eaualIv unlikelv that the modern observers are mistaken. One has to conclude, therefore, that
a change of some kind has taken place.
Just what is going on there, or has been going on, is a question which the second era of astronomy, the telescopic era, cannot answer. The answer
will. have to wait for the third era with its spaceships.
*W. H. Haas prepared a list of twenty-two changes on the moon during 1000 hours ofobserving time which he is convinced are real and which he
tentatively atbibutes to vegetation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some 70 miles west of Plato, in the middle of the "Alps," there is the Great VaIley, about 90 miles long and up to 6.5 miles wide. It runs almost at
right angles to the few and very small other valleys of the "Alps." Its floor is smooth, to the best of observational evidence. And we have ho
explana tion for it at all. One might think of a meteorite some 6 miles in diameter grazing the moon and plowing through the mountains, except that
the valley, while straight, does not seem quite straight enough for such.an explanation. And why is its floor smooth? We'll never know until we get
there.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then there is, of course, Gruithuisen's old puzzle of the "lunar fortress" to be solved. And the problem of the bright surface of the crater
Aristarchus, which looks just like the plaster of Paris craters Dr. Wegener made in his laboratory. There are Professor William H. Pickering's
observations. He thinks he saw a snowstorm on Mount Pico which would indicate sonething like a thin temporary atmosphere in that vicinity. South of
the Mare Imbrium in which Pico is situated, there is the crater Eratosthenes. If it were not for Pickering, Eratosthenes would be regarded as a
medium-sized, very typical, and very beautiful crater. But Pickering repeatedly observed grayish spots moving around inside the crater. Cloud
formations betraying the presence of moisture or lunar vegetation springing up and being killed off by the heat of the sun in a rapid cycle? We'll
never know until we get there.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Near the rim of the moon there is the crater Wargentin. It too would be a normal crater in every respect if it were not for the fact that it is full.
The crater is literally brimful. And flat. The color is about the same as elsewhere,. as far as one can observe, but observation is difficult in this
case because the crater is near the rim. Did a meteorite break through the crust? Did this form the crater or was there a later impact in an existing
crater? The latter seems more likely: it is hard to imagine that a meteorite that broke through the crust could simultaneously produce a typicaI
crater.
Then there is the great "walled plain" of Clavius, well over 150 miles srcross. Since it was formed, seven smaller meteorites have scored hits on
its ringwll, and there are four major and half a dozen minor impact craters in its interior. Obviously they are younger than Clavius since thev are
super-imposed upon it. But they also look younger. The old walls look as if they had been subiected to erosion. This is true for a few other walled
plains too. What kind of erosion?
And finally we have the mystery of IinnÈ, a crater named after Karl von LinnÈ (known in this country under the Latinized version of his name,
Linnaeus) and situated in the Mare serenitatis. LinnÈ shows up against the dark mare plain as a whitish spot, Iooking aIike through the whole lunar
day, too low to cast a noticeable shadow. A few astronomers beginning in about 1890 claimed that, under exceptional seeing conditions and with a big
instrument, a tiny hole could ba discerned in the center of the white spot. But Schmidt, in 1843, described LinnÈ as a crater some 6 miles across, and
an estimated 1200 feet deep. He and several other astronomers of his period used LinnÈ as a Iandmark in the otherwise smooth. mare plain, a reference
point for measurements. Nobody would use it now for this purpose, even thouph it stands alone on the mare plain, nor is Schmidt's description even
remotely correct. But neither does there seem any chance for a mistake, since Linne does stand isolated and the position of the white spot of today
agrees with the position given in 1843.
Is LinnÈ a real volcano that was active some time between 1860 and 1890?
Some day we'll be able to fnd out, a FEW YEARS after the first spaceship lands on the moon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the late evening hours of the twelfth of July, 1822, a Munich astronomer, Franz von Paula Gruithuisen, examined an area close to the center of
the visible half of the moon. There is a rill in that area, usually called the Hyginus rill because it runs through the crater Hyginus in the southern
portion of the Mare vaporum. Near the Hyginus rill there is a formation which on German maps is marked Schneckenberg (Snail Mountain) because it
resembles the upper portion of an enormous snail, half covered by mud or tar.' The whole area in fact, gives such an impression: at some distance
there are mountains which look as if they might be the upper ridges and Peaks of ranges whose lower portions had been buried in a viscous liquid that
later hardened. The formation as a whole looks strange enough to seem artificial. Gruithuisen did not hesitate to say that it was artificial. He took
it to be the ruins of an old fortress that had once guarded a city.
After an interval of breathlessness which followed Gruithuisen's announcement, other observers, especially Gruithuisen's compatriot Madler, tried
to criscredit the "fortress of the selenites." Gruithuisen had published a drawing of the spot. Maidler did too. Gruithuisen had drawn the ruins of
a fortress and a city. Madler drew an irregular pattern of mountain ridges crossing one another. In fairness one must say that each exaggerated in the
direction of what he wanted to prove. The formations are bv no means as regular and "convincing" as Gruithuisen showed them. Nor is the landscape as
featureless as Madler drew it. In the telescope it simply fails to make sense. The final word will have to be spoken in the third era of astronomy,
when an explorer can stand at the foot of Snail Mountain and look at the formation through the transparent plastic of his air helmet.
Taken from
www.planetarymysteries.com/moon/leylinehtml
The thing is there is definatley something on the moon what it is will we ever know.Or can it be proven that we are wrong reguardless of the evidence
there already is and the amount of research going on..
