It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fls13
There are obviously some well documented cases where encounters with UFOs didn't end well, Mantell being the most famous. Still, they are few and far between enough to label the phenomenon benign.
Originally posted by Schaden
I read a theory about a wave of military airplane crashes/unexplained events in the 1950s, not long after the Mantell UFO case. I can't remember the details but statistically there were a lot of accidents in a short period of a few years. The theory goes we may have been in a classified war. (that I'll assume we quickly gave up on fighting) Back in the days when pilots were ordered to "try" and bring them down.
Originally posted by ufo reality
Email Chris Matthews with your comments on what he said at
[email protected]
Greetings,
I doubt this comment will make its way to Chris Matthews, but on July 24th Mr. Matthews commented on a call-in by a Seattle C-SPAN viewer who asked the White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs if the Obama administration plans to live up to its campaign promise of transparency as it particularly relates to the subject of UFOs.
First it should be noted UFOs in no way have anything to do with the ET hypothesis. Second it should be noted that UFOs (representing a genuine unknown phenomenon of extraordinary properties) are a scientifically verifiable fact. The argument that all UFOs represent misidentifications is a fallacy dispelled by USAF Blue Book Special Report 14.
Mr. Matthews said he was open to "any hard evidence that the earth has been visited from abroad." If he was sincere then he might want to read this scholarly paper written up about a 1957 RB-47 case investigated by the USAF that for all intents and purposes seems to demonstrate a foreign aircraft. It's by no means a short read, but it does demonstrate something of a fairly extraordinary nature. I find it difficult to imagine a natural explanation for a radar-emitting ball of light that has the ability to pace a RB-47 and follow it across several states especially during course corrections.
This case particularly stands out because it's tightly corroborated by verification from several passive radar sets, active radar detection on the ground, and mid-air /w visual observations. It's hard to imagine such a thing being an atmospheric or astronomical phenomenon.
Even if we're only encountering a new physical aspect of reality (ha! - only), it's still useful to our understanding of the world around us. It's the very point of science to explain things and to rigorously ascertain aspects of our reality.
The second science stops answering peoples questions in an unbiased manner, it's no longer serving its function. Furthermore it's the point of government to ensure its people safety. Many people, myself included, are floored at the utter irresponsibility of the DOD flatly stating,
No UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the Air Force has ever given any indication of threat to our national security. www.dod.mil...
This is blatant misinformation and patently false.
Mar. 16, 1967 in Montana at the Malmstrom AFB Minutemen Missile Launch Control Center (LCC), a perimeter security guard phoned the on-staff Deputy Crew Commander (DMCCC), Cpt. Robert Salas, in the LCC capsule to report a glowing-red orb floating over the facility. Salas not believing this instructed the man to "call [back] when something more significant happened."
5 to 10 minutes later, following another distressed security call, the alarm klaxon sounded and lights at the commander's station flashed indicating missiles were entering a "no-go," or unlaunchable, condition. Oscar-flight lost 6 to 8 missiles that morning. Several miles away at Echo-flight, under similar circumstances, another LCC crew lost all 10 missiles.
The loss of 1 nuclear missile let alone 18 is unprecedented.
According to FOIA declassified Strategic Missile Wing documents and interviews with ex-Boeing engineers’ tests were unable to identify a pathway for missile shutdowns. Mr. Salas has since gone before the National Press Club and stated that he’s willing to testify before Congress to the truthfulness of this account.
So I find this subject to be of the utmost importance not only to our understanding of the world around us, but as it relates to our very survival. The extremes of what these reported phenomena possibly represent are so dramatic that they practically scream for real scientific analysis and governmental involvement.
All that said I'm very disappointed with Mr. Matthews dismissive attitude. I recommend he educate himself before commenting on a subject he clearly knows very little about.
A displeased viewer,
Originally posted by ufo reality
Email Chris Matthews with your comments on what he said at
[email protected]
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
S&F for him, whoever he is.
But its your thread.
I expect Obama to give the same response as Truman about UFOs.
I think it went something like: Yeah there are a lot of them out there.
A lot better than the response of Forestall to the Alien question.
Better luck to Obama.
Obama might be sticking to Earth bound problems.
I don't see Obama making a JFK and saying we are going to Mars.
The Russians are in training for the month long travel.
Can't wait to see UFOs on the way to Mars.
Now that will wake up the world.