posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 11:17 AM
Obama is a Dictator by his own words.
He said the Constitution is fundamentally flawed because it restrains Government and it doesn't talk about redistribution of wealth. So Obama
understands that the Constitution restrains Government but he sees that as a flaw.
He said during the campaign that he wants to fundamentally change America. He doesn't want Government to be restrained and any President who thinks
like this is a Dictator.
The Founders of this country restrained Government because they didn't want one man or Government controlling peoples lives. They thought that should
be left up to the individual.
Obama said the Constitution only talks about negative liberties. In other words, it only talks about wahat Government can't do to you and not what
Government must do on your behalf.
This is dangerous talk. The Founders just talked about rights because rights are something that can't be taken away. So they saw the role of
Government as protecting the God Given rights of the individual.
Obama sees this as a flaw. He thinks that Government must do things according to his way of thinking. This is a Dictator. The Founders of this country
knew that you can't have Government talking about what it must do and also have individual rights. What Government must due can change from
politician to politician and if Government talks about what it must do and it clashes with the liberty of the individual then that's a
This is why Obama is trying to control everything.
He's controlling banks, car companies, he wants to control executive pay, energy, the health care system, he's appointed over 33 Czars. During the
campaign he talked about a civilian police force that was stronger than the military.
This is the talk and actions of a Dictator not a President. People supported Obama because he said I'm not Bush. Bush was horrible but you haven't
seen anything yet. Obama is gonna be 10x worse and this has nothing to do with politics.
I didn't support Bush or Obama because I listened to their words.
Seven years before Barack Obama's "spread the wealth" comment to Joe the Plumber became a GOP campaign theme, the Democratic presidential
candidate said in a radio interview the U.S. has suffered from a fundamentally flawed Constitution that does not mandate or allow for redistribution
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in
society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the
essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it's been interpreted, and the Warren Court
interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can't do to you. Says what the
federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
Here's a video of the interview.