It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

History Channel Exposed - 9/11 Shanksville Eyewitness Susan McElwain

page: 1
17
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 04:22 AM
link   



This uncut interview footage with Shanksville Eyewitness Susan McElwain debunks the Official Story and exposes The Histroy Channel's heavy editing of her eyewitness account.




posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 05:12 AM
link   
Nive tube.

Who is lying you think ! ?

I remember they aired an 9-11 docu. here in Norway, and I kinda raised my eyebrows, cos it pointed to an conspiracy all the way thru the documentary.

Surprising I thought !!!



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 05:26 AM
link   
S&F

I remember when the history channel ran the 9-11 anniversary special last year, no shots pre-collapse of the Pentagon, they didn't show the towers collapsing, they showed the molten metal dripping from the tower, then a couple of close-up-stills during the collapse with mood MUSIC added...they cut the audio of the collapse...and of course, NO shots of building 7

...they also have some of the best footage I've seen



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 06:49 AM
link   
It is just so refreshing to see a true American telling it like it is!She is so obviously being truthful,she stands in stark contrast with,er,you know the word smiths who craft their tales.She has obviously told and re told her story,yet it retains the flavour of authenticity.I'd like to film a one of these blowhards propping up the buschenabal(bush cheney cabal)calling her a liar to her face.She'd unleash a six pack of whoop ass.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 09:59 AM
link   
Don't broadcasting entities like the History Channel usually have a disclaimer broadcast before showing controversial films? Something to the effect of "the views and opinions expressed in this film are those of the filmaker and do not represent the views and opinions of the History Channel, etc."

I didn't see the film being exposed by interviewers of the Shanksville witness. Was it made by the History Channel itself or by some independant entity?

Just wondering.

The witness is honest, I think, and obviously telling a true story that is at variance with the one promoted by the Bush administration.

What she says would be important if America had not moved beyond a reality based political consensus to a realm of spoon-fed delusions.


[edit on 23-7-2009 by ipsedixit]



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 11:58 AM
link   
There`s another female eye witness video out there somewhere (not sure if it`s the same woman), in which she states the F.B.I. guy interviewing her was basically telling her what type of plane she saw, rather than what in her own words the plane she described.

Condescending is how she described the F.B.I. dude.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 02:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by Seventh
There`s another female eye witness video out there somewhere (not sure if it`s the same woman), in which she states the F.B.I. guy interviewing her was basically telling her what type of plane she saw, rather than what in her own words the plane she described.

Condescending is how she described the F.B.I. dude.


If you're going to be quoting your conspiracy stories then please quote them correctly. You're referring to April Gallop, an administrative specialist working at the Pentagon when the whole place suddenly went BOOM around her. She was brought to the hospital where she was later informed it was an aircraft that hit the Pentagon. Previously, she didn't know what happened, as she was too involved with looking for her newborn infant in the rubble. She is on record as being irate about being frequently being misquoted by people with ulterior motives.

April Gallop interview

Everything else is the product of your own corruption of the facts.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 02:34 PM
link   
reply to post by Seventh
 

It is Susan McElwain you are talking about. Here is a vidclip where she gets into that part of her story. The FBI guy told her she didn't know what a 757 looked like.




posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 02:49 PM
link   
reply to post by Epitaph25
 


It's a nice video but I have concerns about it. I can see clearly how some of the skeptics will be able to tear her apart and this questioning. It's a tough call and that's coming from one who already believes whole heartedly that we have been lied to and that 911 did NOT happen the way we were told it did.

I'm going to have to hold out on this one because it wasn't as enlightening as I thought it would be.

I guess what the big question will be then is what could manuever like that? Once we can pinpoint that then I will feel a bit better about her description.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by GoodOlDave

Originally posted by Seventh
There`s another female eye witness video out there somewhere (not sure if it`s the same woman), in which she states the F.B.I. guy interviewing her was basically telling her what type of plane she saw, rather than what in her own words the plane she described.

Condescending is how she described the F.B.I. dude.


If you're going to be quoting your conspiracy stories then please quote them correctly. You're referring to April Gallop, an administrative specialist working at the Pentagon when the whole place suddenly went BOOM around her. She was brought to the hospital where she was later informed it was an aircraft that hit the Pentagon. Previously, she didn't know what happened, as she was too involved with looking for her newborn infant in the rubble. She is on record as being irate about being frequently being misquoted by people with ulterior motives.

April Gallop interview

Everything else is the product of your own corruption of the facts.


Wow Dave, then I guess when you watch the video in the very next link you will be sending Seventh an apology? Because April never saw a plane. And the quote that you quoted and said was a misquote is pretty much EXACTLY what was stated in the next video.

I know, you have to attack right out of the box instead of try to speak to the topic.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 03:01 PM
link   
reply to post by dariousg
 


Thanks Dariousg, saves me having to do some quotes and link stuff.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 03:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by ipsedixit
reply to post by Seventh
 

It is Susan McElwain you are talking about. Here is a vidclip where she gets into that part of her story. The FBI guy told her she didn't know what a 757 looked like.





In Before The Next Debunker roars in with all guns blazing and manages to de-rail a very basic reply.

That`s the one btw thanks.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by GoodOlDave
 


Could you elaborate?

[edit on 23-7-2009 by Epitaph25]



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 05:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by GoodOlDave

Originally posted by Seventh
There`s another female eye witness video out there somewhere (not sure if it`s the same woman), in which she states the F.B.I. guy interviewing her was basically telling her what type of plane she saw, rather than what in her own words the plane she described.

If you're going to be quoting your conspiracy stories then please quote them correctly. You're referring to April Gallop, an administrative specialist working at the Pentagon when the whole place suddenly went BOOM around her.

In numerous threads, we have seen how Dave has destroyed Logic 101. He's often shown how inept he is with facts.

Here we have another perfect example.

Instead of asking Seventh about the female eyewitness, Dave presumed to know what Seventh was referring to.

It is blatantly clear that Dave's agenda to debunk, without knowing all of the facts, has left him looking a little silly on this occasion.

As dariousg has shown, it was Susan McElwain who spoke about the FBI trying to lead her with the plane description. It had nothing to do with April Gallop. Dave, again, you have shown yourself up for being uninformed, poorly researched and biased.

The hypocrisy is that Dave tells everyone how he has read the Commission Report and dares others to read it. Yet, he has not watched the Susan McElwain video, a first-hand, living eyewitness, with a name, who's testimony raises a lot of unanswered questions.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 10:01 PM
link   
And I have tried reading the 9-11 report,but my bull detector kept going off.It has more sins of commission than omission,is this the reason for the title,"Commission Report"?Those illuminati guys are so clever.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 10:19 PM
link   
reply to post by trueforger
 


One should also look into how much information was withheld from those involved in creating the report, and eventually some of them quit. Leave aside the fact, that the testimonies of many individuals like William Rodriguez was completely ignored, because it wasn't fitting in with the official fiction report.



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 10:44 PM
link   
reply to post by Epitaph25
 


I would love to see an animation / CGI of what she saw.

Hopefully someone will go to the trouble in the future

Great find!



posted on Jul, 23 2009 @ 11:03 PM
link   
reply to post by WatchNLearn
 


So would I, that would be really cool.

Like you, I aint got the time nor the inclination to spend my free time interacting with them self proclaimed "truthers".

I knows this 911 thing is very important right now, the most important thing that ever happen, but I aint got the time either.



posted on Jul, 24 2009 @ 12:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by QweeQwa
Like you, I aint got the time nor the inclination to spend my free time interacting with them self proclaimed "truthers".

You don't have the time to interact with truthers, hey?

Yet in the single day that you have been registered on ATS, you've made 12 posts, all spread across 7 threads in the 9/11 forum.

You don't fool anyone.

If you don't have the time, then don't clutter the threads with your off topic nonsense. Some people might appreciate seeing the video in this thread, as Susan's testimony is very interesting to watch.



posted on Jul, 24 2009 @ 07:03 AM
link   
reply to post by tezzajw
 

He's part of a small but noticeable contingent on ATS. I don't know why these people even post in these forums.

I love a debunker who can duke it out with you in a rational discussion and have chosen some of the best as "worthy adversaries", but before people get upset by some knuckle dragging troll (who, in fairness, could also be a wet behind the ears, naive newby) I really suggest that they check the registration date under his ATS username.

I even started a thread about this subject, the "I Registered Today!!!" thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



new topics

top topics



 
17
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join