It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
will prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from enacting or enforcing any regulations that restrict possession of firearms in National Parks or Wildlife Refuges, as long as the person complies with laws of the state in which the unit is found.
(7) Congress needs to weigh in on the new regulations to ensure that unelected bureaucrats and judges cannot again override the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens on 83,600,000 acres of National Park System land and 90,790,000 acres of land under the jurisdiction of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. (8) The Federal laws should make it clear that the second amendment rights of an individual at a unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System should not be infringed. (b) Protecting the Right of Individuals To Bear arms in Units of the National Park System and the National Wildlife Refuge System- The Secretary of the Interior shall not promulgate or enforce any regulation that prohibits an individual from possessing a firearm including an assembled or functional firearm in any unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System if-- (1) the individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from possessing the firearm; and (2) the possession of the firearm is in compliance with the law of the State in which the unit of the National Park System or the National Wildlife Refuge System is located.
Originally posted by tjack
Kinda goes against the whole "they're coming for my guns" rhetoric we hear so often.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Democrats aren't in favor of banning guns. That is a myth.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
You are however obfuscating the facts.
The Left wants to ban all guns.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
Economically, I am a leftist. Yet I am firmly in support of the second amendment, as well as all of the other amendments. That is because I am a libertarian leftist.
Please, if you want to come off as thoughtful, and accuse others of 'obfuscating facts', then try to refrain from making such generalizations. They do not aid you in the long run.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Well, anyway. Generalizations are very useful, but then, you knew that.
Try this one on for size. Men are sexually attracted to women.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
And while I understand what you're saying, I would have to disagree and say that generalizations are never useful, and only serve to weaken our understanding of how individual minds work. For example, while most men are sexually attracted to women, there are a great deal that are sexually attracted to other men. And even further, many are sexually attracted to both sexes. This is the flaw with generalizations, they don't take the whole picture into account.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
With all due respect, wizard, you just destroyed your intellectual credibility.
Keep working on that education.
Sooner or later, the light will shine.
Originally posted by drwizardphd
So you believe all men are sexually attracted to women? I have met several men in my lifetime who would beg to differ.