It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikerussellus
reply to post by Animal
The CBS/NY Times poll was flawed. A report was done on that last month. I mean, if you JUST poll liberals, what sort of reaction do you think you'll get?
Originally posted by marg6043
Interesting but congress in the US has included as part of the bill that they government will not be part of the health care bill, they will still keep the health care coverage that they enjoy as the higher up elite still at the expenses of tax payer.
Originally posted by Animal
Sorry if it bothers you, but most Americans want a public option. The proof is in the pudding.
Originally posted by CoffinFeeder
i wish I could say TL;DR but in reality, I couldn't get past all the txtspeak spellings and such to get past the first few entries. OMG LRN2SPELL
Originally posted by twistingtree
look at canada they come into the US, what does that say?
[edit on 22-7-2009 by twistingtree]
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
Why not just say you don't like Obama and spare us the rest.
Well, I thought that was obvious. I'm glad you finally caught up with everyone else.
Way to NOT comment on the bill. Since you said nothing, I guess you like the way this healthcare bill is written right?
If all you are going to do is make sly, snarky comments without any word about the actual bill then please keep them to yourself. Thanks!
blogs.healthfreedomalliance.org... hains/
Obama was callous in saying “Loading up on additional tests or additional drugs” must be curbed. “Maybe (some would be) better off not having….surgery, but taking (a) painkiller” instead. He showed disdain and indifference in stating that “the chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80% of the total health care bill out there” – the inference being ration their care and let ‘em die to cut costs.
blogs.healthfreedomalliance.org...
Some cultures respect the old. Under Obama healthcare, we will kill them off. Here’s Peter Singer, professor of bioethics at Princeton University, in a New York Times Magazine article, Why We Must Ration Health Care, already deciding who to kill off once national healthcare hits.
The death of a teenager is a greater tragedy than the death of an 85-year-old, and this should be reflected in our priorities. We can accommodate that difference by calculating the number of life-years saved, rather than simply the number of lives saved. If a teenager can be expected to live another 70 years, saving her life counts as a gain of 70 life-years, whereas if a person of 85 can be expected to live another 5 years,then saving the 85-year-old will count as a gain of only 5 life-years. That suggests that saving one teenager is equivalent to saving 14 85-year-olds.
Originally posted by maybereal11
Okay...I read your response to JohnnyCanuck twice...Your post is one long "snarky comment without any word about the actual bill".....
Kind of ironic isn't it?
Originally posted by tsloan
So again show me where it states were gonna cover illegals and non-residents
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
Worse yet he doesn't even know what is in the bill himself.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by marg6043
Interesting but congress in the US has included as part of the bill that they government will not be part of the health care bill, they will still keep the health care coverage that they enjoy as the higher up elite still at the expenses of tax payer.
Excellent point!
If this piece of # they call a Healthcare plan is so good, why did Congress exempt themselves and all federal employees?
Answer: Because they are a bunch of elitist bastards who know that this bill is a piece of garbage that will help destroy America and God forbid THEY have to wait in line at the hospital or 3 months for a simple procedure.
Originally posted by tsloan
You don't "wait in line" for healthcare in any country that has a national plan
Long wait times have become second nature, despite dangerous consequences. In the period between 2001 and 2006, the United Kingdom saw the median wait time increase from 44 to 51 days for hospital admission after the decision to admit had been made. In 2004, according to a BBC report, waiting times in Scotland and England were 8 months for cataract surgery, 11 months for hip surgery, 12 months for knee replacement, 5 months for repairing a slipped disk, and 5 months for hernia operations. In 2007, in 42% of the localities surveyed, hospitals had to turn women in childbirth away because their maternity wards were full.