Dr.Paul kicking the FED in the TEETH today!!, page 1

Of course the numskull Bernanke defines inflation as the increase in consumer prices. The retard doesn't see or does not want to admit that the PRICE INCREASE was do to the INCREASE in the money supply.

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 01:55 PM by warrenb

reply to post by Gateway

great speech

unfortunately he only had a couple minutes and had to rush through it, so I can see the majority of the public's eyes glazing over and not understanding a word

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 01:59 PM by TheOneElectric

Are you all actually this gullible?

(Warning, only one with true courage will be able to watch)

Skip to 2:00 and watch until the end:
www.youtube.com...

Ron Paul is the controlled opposition, this is a taste of how deep the rabbit hole goes. Be prepared to have your views shattered before you.

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:02 PM by Gateway

reply to post by TheOneElectric

Wait? So the Banksters, the Fed enablers want Ron Paul to succeed. They too all want to END the FED.

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:05 PM by warrenb

reply to post by TheOneElectric

good point

I'll quote myself

Controlling both side of an argument being presented to a third party (the public) is the most powerful tool you can have.

When there is minor or lack of opposition, you need to create one in order to give the appearance that all is fair and balanced in the eyes of the public.

Always appease the public by making them believe they have a choice or that someone is looking out for their best interests.

Add some theatrics to that and you're set, you've got it made.

World politics in a nutshell.

So it seems there is nobody looking out the the average Joe

pitty

Step 1 is realizing the above.
What's Step 2?

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:08 PM by DrumsRfun

If America didn't have so much corruption and manipulation in Washington then you would be addressing him as President Ron Paul.
What a sham.....oops I meant shame.

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:08 PM by nine-eyed-eel

reply to post by PrisonerOfSociety

Bernanke has a pretty extensive manner of (false) superiority in the "inflation" clip.
I notice it in the way he does not answer the actual direct questions Ron Paul puts to him, but kinda lurches sideways with some other material to burn up daylight...It's like he feels he is doing enough by pretending that the congressman's uncouth mouthings are articulate human speech, no need to spoil the natives by actually giving a cogent reply...Ron has such a relatively pleasant and amiable way of calling out Bernanke as a liar, it's too bad Bernanke can't figure out a nice folksy way of implying that Ron is a fool in return...that haughty Bernanke style might ultimately create resentment in some of the more spineless and vacuous representatives, maybe, eventually...it could happen...(like how he uses the title "Congressman" as if it were an afterthought, half-forgotten and not pertaining to anything potent or important...there's a lot of spin and structural expressions of dominance in all of Bernanke's testimony in that clip...)

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:14 PM by TheOneElectric

Originally posted by warrenb
reply to post by TheOneElectric

good point

I'll quote myself

Controlling both side of an argument being presented to a third party (the public) is the most powerful tool you can have.

When there is minor or lack of opposition, you need to create one in order to give the appearance that all is fair and balanced in the eyes of the public.

Always appease the public by making them believe they have a choice or that someone is looking out for their best interests.

Add some theatrics to that and you're set, you've got it made.

World politics in a nutshell.

So it seems there is nobody looking out the the average Joe

pitty

Step 1 is realizing the above.
What's Step 2?

I honestly have no clue. What can you do, other than love? They want us to fear. People like Alex Jones, David Icke, Ron Paul and many others open our eyes merely to throw more dirt into them. Both sides of the argument are controlled and I have no clue what to do. I know this...we do not have to live in fear, not at all.

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:16 PM by TheOneElectric

Originally posted by Gateway
reply to post by TheOneElectric

Wait? So the Banksters, the Fed enablers want Ron Paul to succeed. They too all want to END the FED.

No, you are single minded. Both sides of the argument are controlled purposefully. It is to give the people the misconception that someone is fighting for them, when in reality no big names are (at least overtly). You can go on believing Ron Paul is the hero of the people, or you can follow the ATS motto: Deny Ignorance

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:26 PM by nine-eyed-eel

Originally posted by TheOneElectric

Originally posted by Gateway
reply to post by TheOneElectric

Wait? So the Banksters, the Fed enablers want Ron Paul to succeed. They too all want to END the FED.

No, you are single minded. Both sides of the argument are controlled purposefully. It is to give the people the misconception that someone is fighting for them, when in reality no big names are (at least overtly). You can go on believing Ron Paul is the hero of the people, or you can follow the ATS motto: Deny Ignorance

But see, that's a (so to speak) metaphysical question, requiring us to have a God's-eye-view of Ron Paul's mind or heart or soul...which we never will have (most probably) and so all that is like meaningless and moot...All we can judge readily are his actions, which are, so far, ABOVE AVERAGE at least, and more to my liking than what his peers are doing...so what's wrong with that...and even if he were a controlled troublemaker, that can result, like tidy commercial arson-for-insurance-money, in a whole raft of big exciting unintended consequences...one never knows, do one...

reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 02:33 PM by PrisonerOfSociety

reply to post by Gateway

@1.58, Dr. Evil says they have to raise interest rates at some point to avoid inflation, which i agree is total bullcrap. If anything they want to drill the $ into the ground with the following poa:

1). Print more Fiat money
2). Peoples savings will loose value, causing increased panic spending
2). Unemployment increases, GDP decreases
3). People will become very pissed, social unrest
4). Justification for martial law
5). More centralised power to g'ment over state laws (Montanna is testing the waters with gun laws)
6). The pièce de résistance: unity in diversity