Chemtrails Photo and Research Thread!!!!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 10 times


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 08:02 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by Udontknowme



I do believe a lot of these patents have been presented before as evidence.
(In fact the whole chemtrail debate has been done numerous times)

You do know a patent does not mean it exists right?


An example of another patent:

Pet display clothing
United States Patent 5901666


A vest or belt is integrally formed with tubular, pet receiving passageways which extend around the wearer's body and terminate in pocket-like chambers for feeding and retrieval. Outer wall portions of the passageways are transparent so that a pet moving along the passageways can be seen by a spectator. Graphics or indicia depicting the pet's habitat or a pet story are marked on the vest and extend across portions of the passageways masking delineations or depicting the passageways as burrows.


www.freepatentsonline.com...








[edit on 21/7/09 by Chadwickus]


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 11:07 AM by wonderworld
Chemtrails are supposed to be a secret but they are publically known now. There has been too much research to prove they exisit and have been photographed.

1942: Chemical Warfare Services begins mustard gas experiments on approximately 4,000 servicemen. The experiments continue until 1945 and made use of Seventh Day Adventists who chose to become human guinea pigs rather than serve on active duty.

1994, U.S. military aircraft began dropping a gel substance on the tiny town of Oakville near the Pacific coast. Everybody in town came down with flu and pneumonia-like symptoms. Some people were hospitalized and remained ill for months. Pets and barnyard animals died. The gel material was tested by a number of government and private labs which found human blood cells and nasty bacteria, including a modified version of pseudonomas fluorescens, cited in over 160 military papers as an experimental biowarfare bacteria.

1943: In response to Japan's full-scale germ warfare program, the U.S. begins research on biological weapons at Fort Detrick, MD.

1950: In an experiment to determine how susceptible an American city would be to biological attack, the U.S. Navy sprays a cloud of bacteria from ships over San Francisco. Monitoring devices are situated throughout the city in order to test the extent of infection. Many residents become ill with pneumonia-like symptoms.

1951: Department of Defense begins open air tests using disease-producing bacteria and viruses. Tests last through 1969 and there is concern that people in the surrounding areas have been exposed.


1953: U.S. military releases clouds of zinc cadmium sulfide gas over Winnipeg, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Fort Wayne, the Monocracy River Valley in Maryland, and Leesburg, Virginia. Their intent is to determine how efficiently they could disperse chemical agents.


1953: Joint Army-Navy-CIA experiments are conducted in which tens of thousands of people in New York and San Francisco are exposed to the airborne germs Serratia marcescens and Bacillus glogigii.


In 1953, an odious series of 36 tests was conducted on citizens of Winnipeg in Canada. Our government lied to the Winnipeg mayor, assuring him that the tests were non-toxic and defense-necessary. The actual purpose of these CIA-designed tests was to see how large a percentage of the population could be given chemical-induced cancer.

1955: The CIA, in an experiment to test its ability to infect human populations with biological agents, releases a bacteria withdrawn from the Army's biological warfare arsenal over Tampa Bay, Fl.
Congressional hearings of 1975, 1977 and 1994 confirm in nauseating detail that our illustrious Department of Death has used the American population as hapless guinea pigs since WWII. Rutgers professor Leonard Cole collected from U.S. military records a horrifying list of biological and chemical agents furtively tested on American and Canadian civilian populations.


1977: Senate hearings on Health and Scientific Research confirm that 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. Some of the areas included San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Key West, Panama City, Minneapolis, and St. Louis.

1996: Department of Defense admits that Desert Storm soldiers were exposed to chemical agents.

1997: Medical journalist Ermina Cassani reported 29 biological “drops” in the state of Utah. HAZMAT teams in biochemical hazard gear cleaned up the feces with chlorine. Utah is home to the infamous Dugway Proving Grounds, a chemical-biological test center where hundreds of former workers have contracted Gulf-War like symptoms, according to a 1997 testimony before a government committee.


1999: Ermina Cassani has investigated nation-wide reports of such biological waste being dropped on neighborhoods from low-flying planes. Cassani investigated over 30 different yuk drops during the years 1998 and 1999. In 1998, she obtained a sample that looked like dried blood from a Michigan house. Examining this material, a University of Michigan lab found pseudonomas fluorescens, the same bug used on Oakville. It can cause horrible human infections including fatal shock, and because of its glowing properties, it allows the military to track its path.


In 1999, Jonathan Moreno of Clinton's Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, also confirmed in his book Undue Risk decades of murderous military-intelligence experimentation on civilians without their knowledge or consent

.
www.skyhighway.com...


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 11:23 AM by wonderworld
reply to post by rubbertramp



Thanks I started a chemtrail thread a while back I may have an image before 1980? I'd need to check.

All the same debunkers are on all chemtrail threads but then again so are the supporters. I dont understand why they dont accept the "What If" theory.


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 11:24 AM by defcon5
reply to post by rubbertramp



Did you miss my post where I did exactly what you asked for, or am I on your ignore list?


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 11:56 AM by weedwhacker
reply to post by wonderworld



Sorry, you keep showing the SAME photos....

Why?

I mean, really...if this were such a real, ongoing event, wouldn't there be more and more examples, EVERY DAY???



This one has been seen umpteen times. Here on ATS. It has no location or date and time information. It could be a composit photo, done in computer, for all we know. The bright "Sun" iin the center? I ask you: How many times have you managed to take a phot with the Sun in the very center of the shot?

"Oh!," you'll say, "It was shining through the clouds!"

Well, again....that's pretty fortuitous, for that photographer to be at exactly the correct angle at the exact moment....or, it was a multiple exposure, and done later in the lab???


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 12:15 PM by wonderworld
reply to post by weedwhacker



Probably for the same reason you repeat the same exact words, over and over again.

I also have a clear view of the sky, where I'm at. I can watch the normal east/west-north/south flight paths the do not form a grid or X pattern at any time. Lots of air traffic here.

[edit on 21-7-2009 by wonderworld]

[edit on 21-7-2009 by wonderworld]



reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 12:20 PM by wonderworld
reply to post by QBSneak000



Because it started out with good intentions, they were expirementing and really botched up. They wont admit it though.

Other times it was intentional, spraying for west nile but didnt expect a huge increace in thyroid cancer and respiratory illness. We are test projects.


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 12:28 PM by QBSneak000
reply to post by wonderworld



Spraying for west nile at 30,000 to 40,000 feet would be useless. They would have had to do more of a crop duster type of spraying at a much lower altitude (a couple of hundred feet or so at the most). As for the rise in cancer etc. couldn't that be more from smoking, additives in foods, aspertame, etc?

Im not denying that the governments don't do horrible things, I'm just saying that to do it by "chemtrails" again wouldn't be cost effective nor an effective means of damage due to the heights and atmospheric conditions at those heights involved.


reply posted on 21-7-2009 @ 12:29 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by wonderworld



Roll Cloud:

Arcus cloud

An arcus cloud is a low, horizontal cloud formation associated with the leading edge of thunderstorm outflow, or occasionally with a cold front even in the absence of thunderstorms. Roll clouds and shelf clouds are the two types of arcus clouds, slight variations in their generation and appearance being the difference.

en.wikipedia.org...




BTW...the reason we have to 'repeat' the obvious concerning contrails (and other clouds) is because sometimes that's the only way some people can learn...

Others take the effort to study in the associated field, and consider ALL facets, not just their pet hunches....



[edit on 21 July 2009 by weedwhacker]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 18 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags