It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Welfhard
reply to post by OldThinker
Oh yea, I forgot. I'll put it on my iPod.
Originally posted by OldThinker
Originally posted by Torem3ff3ct
Hey there! Sorry to possibly divert the current topic. I've been reading this thread since it's inception and I have a question which seems to have been overlooked. The bit about the dinosaur footprints in the same rockbed as human footprints. This seems like a bit of a problem evolutionarily (is that even a word?) if it's the real-deal. Anyways, just an observation. Really good debate so far guys!!
Definitely a great debate...
I dunno? OT thinks the evidence I presented was stellar!
Hoax?
I hope not?
OT
[The Texas Dinosaur/"Man Track" Controversy]
For many years claims were made by strict creationists that human footprints or "giant man tracks" occur alongside dinosaur tracks in the limestone beds of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose Texas. If true, such a finding would dramatically contradict the conventional geologic timetable, which holds that humans did not appear on earth until over 60 million years after the dinosaurs became extinct. However, the "man track" claims have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and have been abandoned even by most creationists. The supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including forms of elongate (metatarsal) dinosaur tracks, erosional features, indistinct markings of uncertain origin, and some doctored and carved specimens (most of the latter on loose blocks of rock).
I dunno? OT thinks the evidence I presented was stellar!