It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hoppinmad1
This is why I said Iraq will have a better future. I am discussing the current situation. In the united states we have laws in place keeping weapons like rpg's and artillery weapons out of private hands. Untill these things are taken away from the iraqis they will be rebellious.
Is a future forced on them by the U.S. any better than one forced on they by Saddam. He at least kept them in control. There have been an estimated 70,000 iraqis killed in this war. Let them make their own government.
Ending I never said they were sub human. Your putting words in my mouth. Many Iraqis are more inclined to violence due to religious extremist and thier leaders. Their basically brainwashed. I wasn't talking about 70 years from now. I am talking about now.
Originally posted by curme
I think it is easier to understand when you not consider Iraq as one country, but a serveral nations, forced to share the same borders.
The merging of the three provinces of Mosul, Baghdad, and Basra into one political entity and the creation of a nation out of the diverse religious and ethnic elements inhabiting these lands was accomplished after World War I. Action undertaken by the British military authorities during the war and the upsurge of nationalism after the war helped determine the shape of the new Iraqi state and the course of events during the postwar years, until Iraq finally emerged as an independent political entity in 1932.
From a page that tells the history of Iraq
HERE.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Saddam was a good man.
Never did anything wrong worth mentioning in world opinion.
He didn't invade Kuwait, Kuwait invited him.
He never had WMD, the world and the UN made those stories, reports, and documentations up, even before and after the 1st Gulf War.
Those mass graves steadily being found and dug up today were not from his doing.
The Kurds are liars.
The Shi'ites are liars.
The Sunni are lairs.
He treated everyone with kindness and mercy.
The sanctions were illegial.
He was really a swell guy and should be put back into his position of authority.
The US and Coalition should repay all the war damage caused within 'his' country.
Reparations should be payed.
Saddam is the man and is the man that Iraq needs back today.
seekerof
Originally posted by Illmatic67
And who placed Saddam in charge of Iraq in the first place. Enough said.
Originally posted by Agent47
GWB? Really? Last time I checked Saddam put Saddam in power during the Baathist Coup. Talk about biased misinformation.
Now I will let that slide though because your 19 and such an Ol G member.
Originally posted by Illmatic67
First of all, did I say GWB? Where did I say GWB? Don't put words in my mouth.
Originally posted by Seekerof
I believe what you and others believe....I have seen the light.
Saddam should be removed from his cell, given a formal world apology from the US, given the 87+ 25 billion dollars, rearmed, and placed back into power.
That doesn't sound fair to you?
seekerof
Originally posted by Agent47
You left your words up to interpretation when you railed against GWB and then said "Who put saddam in power. Nuff Said". Some may have connected dots that you didnt intend.
Oh yes I musnt display sarcasm because "no one can touch Illmatic" or however you put it in that thread.
Originally posted by Seekerof
I believe what you and others believe....I have seen the light.
Saddam should be removed from his cell, given a formal world apology from the US, given the 87+ 25 billion dollars, rearmed, and placed back into power.
That doesn't sound fair to you?
seekerof
Originally posted by Illmatic67
Then next time why don't you ask me what I meant instead of assuming it.
Your probably mad because I ignored your u2 you sent me a while ago and I kept you in the dark you fake.
Originally posted by Illmatic67
Then next time why don't you ask me what I meant instead of assuming it.
And this whole reference thing to my post is so stupid I can't believe they gave you that award.
Originally posted by junglejake
Then...Why would he assume you would clarify something for him if you won't even respond to his U2Us?
EDIT: Oh, yeah. you seek clarification, too, Ill.
[Edited on 5-9-2004 by junglejake]
Originally posted by Illmatic67
=Jungle, you don't even know what happened so I don't know why you are speaking of it, with all due respect.
And I was referring to him assuming I meant Bush put Saddam in charge of Iraq which I didn't.
The u2 is a whole separate thing entirely.