reply to post by pazcat
This is exactly why all this about the so called vaccine is very, very dodgy.
If you have the 'mild' version of the virus and recover you will have immunity against THE MILD VERSION of the virus.
If the virus does NOT mutate, and the vaccine is genuine - the vaccine will (if it doesn't kill you) give you immunity against THE MILD VERSION of
If the virus DOES mutate, neither having THE MILD VERSION of the virus previously or taking THE VACCINE (designed for the current UN-MUTATED VERSION)
will give you any protection at all from a MUTATED virus.
Do you see?
As has been asked, what good is the so called vaccine, if it's designed to counter the NON-MUTATED strain of virus?
So far, 99.5% of people infected with this MILD VIRUS recover fully within a week or so, so why are we talking mandatory vaccinations and countrywide
military style vaccination centres for a mild virus that almost all people will recover from within a week or two?
The companies that HAVE developed the vaccine, MUST have based the vaccine on the CURRENT MILD VERSION of the virus...
so ANYONE, please tell me how this is going to be effective against a MUTATED virus, that changes it's surface protiens and internal structure?
It WON'T BE.
It will be like having mild skin cancer, such as a mole or something and going to the doctor and having it cut off right in his or her office.
Then getting terminal lung cancer...and wondering why simply slicing off your lungs won't save you from the cancer!
The skin and lung diseases are both cancer, is just that the treatment for the mild version of cancer, will kill the patient with the severe form of
The same treatment will not work for both, as even though they are both cancer, they are very different to each other.
As different to each other as a mild virus is to a mutated virus...